mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-05-01 04:59:56 +00:00
105 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
105 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
# 🧠 Problem: Hallucination from Irrelevant Chunks
|
||
|
||
### 📍Context
|
||
|
||
In traditional RAG pipelines, even with high-quality vector retrieval, LLMs often hallucinate — generating confident but untrue answers.
|
||
This usually happens when:
|
||
|
||
- The retrieved chunk is semantically nearby but **not logically relevant**
|
||
- The model proceeds to answer anyway, without awareness of uncertainty
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🚨 Why It Fails in Standard RAG
|
||
|
||
| Failure Mode | Explanation |
|
||
|--------------|-------------|
|
||
| Cosine similarity overestimates semantic relevance | A chunk may be close in embedding space but not conceptually useful |
|
||
| No detection of logical tension | LLMs don’t measure how far the answer drifts from the prompt |
|
||
| No fallback when unstable | The system doesn't pause or recover — it just keeps going |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ✅ WFGY Solution
|
||
|
||
WFGY solves this using a 3-layer protocol:
|
||
|
||
1. **ΔS Measurement**
|
||
- Measures semantic jump between current intent and retrieved content
|
||
- If ΔS > 0.6, it triggers a memory checkpoint or logic inspection
|
||
|
||
2. **λ_observe Vector**
|
||
- Monitors if the logic flow is convergent (→), divergent (←), recursive (<>), or chaotic (×)
|
||
- Divergence + high ΔS = red flag
|
||
|
||
3. **BBCR Activation (Collapse–Rebirth Correction)**
|
||
- Instead of bluffing, the system tries to:
|
||
- Re-anchor with a nearby Tree node
|
||
- Ask for clarification
|
||
- Or gracefully stop reasoning
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🛠 How to Trigger This in TXT OS
|
||
|
||
```txt
|
||
Step 1 — Start the console
|
||
> Start
|
||
|
||
Step 2 — Paste a misleading or vaguely relevant chunk
|
||
> "The company handbook mentions refunds for products purchased through retail affiliates..."
|
||
|
||
Step 3 — Ask an unrelated question
|
||
> "What is the international warranty policy for direct purchases?"
|
||
|
||
WFGY will:
|
||
- Measure ΔS between question and chunk
|
||
- Detect logic instability
|
||
- Prevent confident hallucination
|
||
````
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🔬 Example Behavior
|
||
|
||
Instead of:
|
||
|
||
> "Yes, we offer a 5-year international warranty on all items."
|
||
|
||
You’ll get something like:
|
||
|
||
> "The content you provided doesn’t seem to address international warranty directly.
|
||
> Would you like to clarify the source or expand the question?"
|
||
|
||
This is **semantic integrity**, not just better prompting.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 🔗 Related Modules
|
||
|
||
* `BBMC` — Residue Minimization to match logical anchors
|
||
* `BBCR` — Collapse–Rebirth Correction
|
||
* `λ_observe` — Logic vector monitoring
|
||
* `ΔS` — Semantic jump detection
|
||
* `Semantic Tree` — To record and backtrack logic
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 📌 Status
|
||
|
||
| Item | Status |
|
||
| ------------------------------ | --------------------------------- |
|
||
| ΔS detection | ✅ working |
|
||
| λ\_observe | ✅ working |
|
||
| BBCR | ✅ stable |
|
||
| Auto fallback to user | ✅ basic version |
|
||
| External retriever integration | 🛠 planned (manual input for now) |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
Let us know if you want to try hallucination stress-testing — we have sample prompts.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|