mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-04-30 04:29:57 +00:00
3.1 KiB
3.1 KiB
🧠 Problem: Hallucination from Irrelevant Chunks
📍Context
In traditional RAG pipelines, even with high-quality vector retrieval, LLMs often hallucinate — generating confident but untrue answers.
This usually happens when:
- The retrieved chunk is semantically nearby but not logically relevant
- The model proceeds to answer anyway, without awareness of uncertainty
🚨 Why It Fails in Standard RAG
| Failure Mode | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Cosine similarity overestimates semantic relevance | A chunk may be close in embedding space but not conceptually useful |
| No detection of logical tension | LLMs don’t measure how far the answer drifts from the prompt |
| No fallback when unstable | The system doesn't pause or recover — it just keeps going |
✅ WFGY Solution
WFGY solves this using a 3-layer protocol:
-
ΔS Measurement
- Measures semantic jump between current intent and retrieved content
- If ΔS > 0.6, it triggers a memory checkpoint or logic inspection
-
λ_observe Vector
- Monitors if the logic flow is convergent (→), divergent (←), recursive (<>), or chaotic (×)
- Divergence + high ΔS = red flag
-
BBCR Activation (Collapse–Rebirth Correction)
- Instead of bluffing, the system tries to:
- Re-anchor with a nearby Tree node
- Ask for clarification
- Or gracefully stop reasoning
- Instead of bluffing, the system tries to:
🛠 How to Trigger This in TXT OS
Step 1 — Start the console
> Start
Step 2 — Paste a misleading or vaguely relevant chunk
> "The company handbook mentions refunds for products purchased through retail affiliates..."
Step 3 — Ask an unrelated question
> "What is the international warranty policy for direct purchases?"
WFGY will:
- Measure ΔS between question and chunk
- Detect logic instability
- Prevent confident hallucination
🔬 Example Behavior
Instead of:
"Yes, we offer a 5-year international warranty on all items."
You’ll get something like:
"The content you provided doesn’t seem to address international warranty directly. Would you like to clarify the source or expand the question?"
This is semantic integrity, not just better prompting.
🔗 Related Modules
BBMC— Residue Minimization to match logical anchorsBBCR— Collapse–Rebirth Correctionλ_observe— Logic vector monitoringΔS— Semantic jump detectionSemantic Tree— To record and backtrack logic
📌 Status
| Item | Status |
|---|---|
| ΔS detection | ✅ working |
| λ_observe | ✅ working |
| BBCR | ✅ stable |
| Auto fallback to user | ✅ basic version |
| External retriever integration | 🛠 planned (manual input for now) |
Let us know if you want to try hallucination stress-testing — we have sample prompts.