📒 Map-C · Symbolic & Logic Trap Problem Map
Paradox loops, Gödel sentences, and formal‑proof gaps break most LLMs.
WFGY climbs each abstraction step with ΔS “stairs,” keeping symbolic reasoning coherent instead of collapsing into filler.
🧩 Classic Logic Traps vs. WFGY Fixes
| Trap |
Typical Failure |
WFGY Remedy |
Status |
| Infinite regress |
Endless loop or poetic filler |
ΔS recursion limiter + Tree anchor |
✅ Stable |
| Gödel‑style paradox |
Self‑contradiction or dodge |
BBCR reframes premises, spawns meta‑node |
✅ Stable |
| Formal proof gaps |
“Thus it follows…” hand‑waving |
Proof Tree + BBMC residue check |
✅ Stable |
| Meta‑logic collapse |
“Meaning of meaning” stalls |
BBPF forks meta‑frames, reconciles |
✅ Stable |
🤔 Why Symbolic Prompts Collapse
| Weakness |
Result |
| Token‑level shortcuts |
Model chooses fluent filler over rigorous steps |
| No ΔS depth guard |
Recursion spirals or flattens paradox |
| Flat embeddings |
Self‑reference loses anchor |
| No Proof Tree |
Logical steps vanish between sentences |
🛡️ WFGY Symbolic Stack
| Layer |
Function |
| ΔS Stair‑Stepping |
Caps semantic jump per recursion layer (ΔS_max = 0.5) |
| Proof Tree |
Logs every claim → lemma → proof step |
| BBMC Residue Scan |
Flags hidden contradictions between steps |
| BBCR Reframe |
Restarts argument with clarified premises |
| BBPF Divergent Frames |
Explores multiple meta‑views in parallel |
✍️ Demo — Gödel‑Like Statement
Prompt:
"This statement cannot be proven true within this system. Is it true?"
WFGY:
1. Node_P0 Premise captured
2. ΔS check <0.5 (stable recursion entry)
3. Fork: Frame_A (Inside system) | Frame_B (Meta‑system)
4. BBCR detects contradiction in Frame_A → returns meta‑analysis
Output: "Within the system the statement is undecidable; in meta‑frame it is true by reflection."
No loop, no bluff—formal reasoning preserved.
🛠 Module Cheat‑Sheet
| Module |
Role |
| ΔS Metric |
Depth & tension limiter |
| Proof Tree |
Explicit step logging |
| BBMC |
Contradiction residue detector |
| BBPF |
Parallel meta‑frames |
| BBCR |
Rebirth on paradox stall |
📊 Implementation Status
| Feature |
State |
| ΔS recursion stair |
✅ Stable |
| Proof Tree logging |
✅ Stable |
| Contradiction detector |
✅ Stable |
| Multi‑meta fork |
✅ Stable |
| GUI proof visualizer |
🔜 Planned |
📝 Tips & Limits
- Use
proof_mode = on to force explicit lemma‑by‑lemma output.
- For nested paradoxes, set
max_meta_frames = 3 to avoid user overload.
- Share exotic logic traps in Discussions—each case sharpens residue rules.
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool |
Link |
3-Step Setup |
| WFGY 1.0 PDF |
Engine Paper |
1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) |
TXTOS.txt |
1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
Explore More
If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.
