8.1 KiB
Eval Governance: Gates and Sign-off — Guardrails and Fix Patterns
🧭 Quick Return to Map
You are in a sub-page of Governance.
To reorient, go back here:
- Governance — policy enforcement and compliance controls
- WFGY Global Fix Map — main Emergency Room, 300+ structured fixes
- WFGY Problem Map 1.0 — 16 reproducible failure modes
Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.
A governance control page for evaluation pipelines, approval gates, and release sign-off.
Use this page when models are shipped without evaluation, when sign-offs are missing, or when evaluation metrics drift without detection.
When to use this page
- Model released with no reproducible evaluation.
- Evaluation set not tied to lineage or version.
- Sign-off done informally or not logged.
- Thresholds vary arbitrarily across teams.
- Failures pass through without regression detection.
Acceptance targets
- Coverage ≥ 0.70 of target section in eval set.
- ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 across governed evals.
- λ_observe remains convergent across three paraphrases and two seeds.
- Every sign-off has owner, date, thresholds, and waiver expiry.
- Regression gates block release when ΔS ≥ 0.60 or coverage < 0.70.
- Sign-off artifact immutable and joinable to lineage.
Typical breakpoints and WFGY fix
-
No evaluation attached to release
→ policy_baseline.md
Require canonical eval policy before model moves forward. -
Unlogged or informal approvals
→ audit_and_logging.md
Enforce immutable sign-off records. -
Eval sets drift or vanish
→ data_lineage_and_provenance.md
Track provenance of datasets and eval snapshots. -
Thresholds applied inconsistently
→ regulatory_alignment.md
Align thresholds with governance policy and external compliance. -
Regression passes undetected
→ regression_gate.md
Block deployment on failing ΔS or λ.
Minimal governance checklist
- Immutable eval set with versioned hash tied to release.
- Threshold contract documented in governance policy.
- Dual sign-off required (technical + governance approver).
- Waivers expire and are linked to a risk register entry.
- Regression gates enforced in automation, not manual process.
- Audit trail: stored in lineage, accessible for inspection.
Example: Sign-off schema
{
"model_id": "v2.1.4",
"eval_set_hash": "f89a1c3e...",
"ΔS_threshold": 0.45,
"coverage_threshold": 0.70,
"signoff": [
{"role": "tech lead", "name": "Alice", "date": "2025-08-25"},
{"role": "governance officer", "name": "Ravi", "date": "2025-08-26"}
],
"waivers": [
{"risk_id": "R-223", "expiry": "2025-12-31"}
]
}
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3-Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
🧭 Explore More
| Module | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY Core | WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack | View → |
| Problem Map 1.0 | Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework | View → |
| Problem Map 2.0 | RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines | View → |
| Semantic Clinic Index | Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift | View → |
| Semantic Blueprint | Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations | View → |
| Benchmark vs GPT-5 | Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite | View → |
| 🧙♂️ Starter Village 🏡 | New here? Lost in symbols? Click here and let the wizard guide you through | Start → |
👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame — Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.
⭐ WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. ⭐ Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.
要我直接繼續生產嗎?