Compliance — Enterprise Knowledge Governance

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of Enterprise_Knowledge_Gov.
To reorient, go back here:

Enterprise_Knowledge_Gov — corporate knowledge management and governance

WFGY Global Fix Map — main Emergency Room, 300+ structured fixes

WFGY Problem Map 1.0 — 16 reproducible failure modes

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

Guardrails and fix patterns for aligning enterprise knowledge management with legal, regulatory, and internal compliance requirements. Use this page when retrieval, storage, or reasoning drifts into non-compliant outputs even though the raw system looks healthy.

When to use this page

Retrieved snippets contain PII or sensitive records without redaction.
AI answers include restricted regulatory clauses without context.
Citations point to outdated compliance frameworks (e.g., GDPR 2016 vs 2021).
Access logs show gaps in provenance or audit trails.
External connectors sync content that violates retention policy.

Core acceptance targets

ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 within compliant scope.
Coverage ≥ 0.70 for allowed data, <0.05 for redacted or forbidden scopes.
λ convergent across three paraphrases and two seeds.
Every snippet carries compliance_tag, retention_scope, and audit_hash.

Typical compliance problems → exact fix

Symptom	Likely cause	Open this
Leaked PII (emails, phone numbers)	No compliance redaction contract	data-contracts.md, retrieval-traceability.md
Citations reference outdated law text	Missing version control on KB	chunking-checklist.md
Audit trail gaps	Index or connector does not log hashes	bootstrap-ordering.md
Over-redaction (useful data removed)	Regex-only redactors collapse semantics	logic-collapse.md

Fix in 60 seconds

Check ΔS against compliant anchor text.
Validate snippet contracts: enforce {snippet_id, compliance_tag, retention_scope, audit_hash}.
Rebuild compliance filter: replace regex-only redaction with semantic filters.
Re-index with version locks for regulatory text.
Verify λ stability across paraphrases within compliant sections only.

Copy-paste schema (YAML)

snippet_id: "KB-98231"
section_id: "SEC-77"
compliance_tag: "gdpr_2021"
retention_scope: "7_years"
audit_hash: "sha256:..."
text: "..."

Escalate when

ΔS ≥ 0.60 persists after re-index and contract rebuild.
Sensitive snippets reappear across paraphrases.
Legal team confirms regulatory mismatch.

Escalation path: rebuild with eval_rag_precision_recall.md and audit via retrieval-traceability.md.

🔗 Quick-Start Downloads

Tool	Link	3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF	Engine Paper	1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + ”
TXT OS (plain-text OS)	TXTOS.txt	1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

Module	Description	Link
WFGY Core	Canonical framework entry point	View
Problem Map	Diagnostic map and navigation hub	View
Tension Universe Experiments	MVP experiment field	View
Recognition	Where WFGY is referenced or adopted	View
AI Guide	Anti-hallucination reading protocol for tools	View

If this repository helps, starring it improves discovery for other builders.

5.6 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape