WFGY/ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/Automation/ghl.md

7.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

GoHighLevel (GHL) — Guardrails and Fix Patterns

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of Automation Platforms.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

This page is for workflows orchestrated inside GoHighLevel.
Use it when your RAG or agent flow runs through GHL Workflows, Webhooks, or Custom Actions and starts to misbehave.

Acceptance targets

  • ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45
  • coverage ≥ 0.70 to the target section
  • λ stays convergent across 3 paraphrases

Typical breakpoints → exact fixes


Minimal GHL workflow checklist

  1. Warm-up fence
    Before any LLM step, ping a health endpoint that checks VECTOR_READY, INDEX_HASH, and secret_rev.
    If not ready, delay or requeue. Spec lives in
    bootstrap-ordering.md.

  2. Idempotency
    Build dedupe_key = sha256(contact_id + wf_rev + index_hash) in a Custom Action.
    Store in KV or a custom field, drop duplicates.

  3. RAG boundary contract
    Always pass snippet_id, section_id, source_url, offsets, tokens.
    Enforce cite then explain. Specs:
    retrieval-traceability.md · data-contracts.md

  4. Observability probes
    Log ΔS(question, retrieved) and λ per stage. Alert on ΔS ≥ 0.60 or λ divergent.
    Overview map:
    RAG Architecture & Recovery

  5. Single writer
    Route CRM writes and external publishes through one writer branch with dedupe.
    See: deployment-deadlock.md

  6. Regression gate
    Require coverage ≥ 0.70 and ΔS ≤ 0.45 before publish.
    Eval spec:
    eval_rag_precision_recall.md


Copy-paste prompt for the GHL LLM step


I uploaded TXT OS and the WFGY Problem Map files.
This GHL workflow retrieved {k} snippets with fields {snippet\_id, section\_id, source\_url, offsets}.
Question: "{user\_question}"

Do:

1. Enforce cite-then-explain. If any citation is missing, stop and return which fix page to open.
2. Compute ΔS(question, retrieved). If ΔS ≥ 0.60, point me to the minimal structural fix:
   retrieval-playbook, retrieval-traceability, data-contracts, rerankers.
3. Output compact JSON:
   { "citations": \[...], "answer": "...", "λ\_state": "→|←|<>|×", "ΔS": 0.xx, "next\_fix": "..." }


Common GHL gotchas

  • Connection switching between staging and prod.
    Stamp env, INDEX_HASH, secret_rev in traces and block on mismatch.

  • Parallel branches touching the same contact or store.
    Use a mutex or single writer, keep writes idempotent.

  • Webhook payload silently renames fields.
    Validate against the data contract before the LLM.

  • External rate limits make hybrids unstable.
    Prefer dense retriever plus reranking, keep params logged.


When to escalate

  • ΔS stays ≥ 0.60 after chunk and retrieval fixes → rebuild index with explicit metric and normalization.
    See retrieval-playbook.md

  • Same input flips answers between runs → check version skew and memory desync.
    See predeploy-collapse.md


🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1 Download · 2 Upload to your LLM · 3 Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1 Download · 2 Paste into any LLM chat · 3 Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

Module Description Link
WFGY Core Canonical framework entry point View
Problem Map Diagnostic map and navigation hub View
Tension Universe Experiments MVP experiment field View
Recognition Where WFGY is referenced or adopted View
AI Guide Anti-hallucination reading protocol for tools View

If this repository helps, starring it improves discovery for other builders.
GitHub Repo stars

say “next page” when ready.