8.3 KiB
GoHighLevel (GHL) — Guardrails and Fix Patterns
🧭 Quick Return to Map
You are in a sub-page of Automation Platforms.
To reorient, go back here:
- Automation Platforms — stabilize no-code workflows and integrations
- WFGY Global Fix Map — main Emergency Room, 300+ structured fixes
- WFGY Problem Map 1.0 — 16 reproducible failure modes
Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.
This page is for workflows orchestrated inside GoHighLevel.
Use it when your RAG or agent flow runs through GHL Workflows, Webhooks, or Custom Actions and starts to misbehave.
Acceptance targets
- ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45
- coverage ≥ 0.70 to the target section
- λ stays convergent across 3 paraphrases
Typical breakpoints → exact fixes
-
Triggers fire before data or index is actually ready
Fix No.14: Bootstrap Ordering →
bootstrap-ordering.md -
First call after deploy crashes or picks the wrong secret
Fix No.16: Pre-Deploy Collapse →
predeploy-collapse.md -
Circular waits between CRM updates, webhooks, background jobs
Fix No.15: Deployment Deadlock →
deployment-deadlock.md -
High cosine similarity but the meaning is off
Fix No.5: Embedding ≠ Semantic →
embedding-vs-semantic.md -
Snippet feels unrelated or citations don’t match the source
Fix No.8: Retrieval Traceability →
retrieval-traceability.md
Contract the payload with Data Contracts →
data-contracts.md -
Hybrid retrieval (external tools) does worse than a single retriever
Pattern: Query Parsing Split →
pattern_query_parsing_split.md
Also review Rerankers →
rerankers.md -
Facts are indexed yet never show up
Pattern: Vectorstore Fragmentation →
pattern_vectorstore_fragmentation.md -
Two sources get blended into one answer in long flows
Pattern: Symbolic Constraint Unlock (SCU) →
pattern_symbolic_constraint_unlock.md
Minimal GHL workflow checklist
-
Warm-up fence
Before any LLM step, ping a health endpoint that checksVECTOR_READY,INDEX_HASH, andsecret_rev.
If not ready, delay or requeue. Spec lives in
bootstrap-ordering.md. -
Idempotency
Builddedupe_key = sha256(contact_id + wf_rev + index_hash)in a Custom Action.
Store in KV or a custom field, drop duplicates. -
RAG boundary contract
Always passsnippet_id,section_id,source_url,offsets,tokens.
Enforce cite then explain. Specs:
retrieval-traceability.md · data-contracts.md -
Observability probes
Log ΔS(question, retrieved) and λ per stage. Alert on ΔS ≥ 0.60 or λ divergent.
Overview map:
RAG Architecture & Recovery -
Single writer
Route CRM writes and external publishes through one writer branch with dedupe.
See: deployment-deadlock.md -
Regression gate
Require coverage ≥ 0.70 and ΔS ≤ 0.45 before publish.
Eval spec:
eval_rag_precision_recall.md
Copy-paste prompt for the GHL LLM step
I uploaded TXT OS and the WFGY Problem Map files.
This GHL workflow retrieved {k} snippets with fields {snippet\_id, section\_id, source\_url, offsets}.
Question: "{user\_question}"
Do:
1. Enforce cite-then-explain. If any citation is missing, stop and return which fix page to open.
2. Compute ΔS(question, retrieved). If ΔS ≥ 0.60, point me to the minimal structural fix:
retrieval-playbook, retrieval-traceability, data-contracts, rerankers.
3. Output compact JSON:
{ "citations": \[...], "answer": "...", "λ\_state": "→|←|<>|×", "ΔS": 0.xx, "next\_fix": "..." }
Common GHL gotchas
-
Connection switching between staging and prod.
Stampenv,INDEX_HASH,secret_revin traces and block on mismatch. -
Parallel branches touching the same contact or store.
Use a mutex or single writer, keep writes idempotent. -
Webhook payload silently renames fields.
Validate against the data contract before the LLM. -
External rate limits make hybrids unstable.
Prefer dense retriever plus reranking, keep params logged.
When to escalate
-
ΔS stays ≥ 0.60 after chunk and retrieval fixes → rebuild index with explicit metric and normalization.
See retrieval-playbook.md -
Same input flips answers between runs → check version skew and memory desync.
See predeploy-collapse.md
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3-Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
Explore More
| Layer | Page | What it’s for |
|---|---|---|
| ⭐ Proof | WFGY Recognition Map | External citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof |
| ⚙️ Engine | WFGY 1.0 | Original PDF tension engine and early logic sketch (legacy reference) |
| ⚙️ Engine | WFGY 2.0 | Production tension kernel for RAG and agent systems |
| ⚙️ Engine | WFGY 3.0 | TXT based Singularity tension engine (131 S class set) |
| 🗺️ Map | Problem Map 1.0 | Flagship 16 problem RAG failure taxonomy and fix map |
| 🗺️ Map | Problem Map 2.0 | Global Debug Card for RAG and agent pipeline diagnosis |
| 🗺️ Map | Problem Map 3.0 | Global AI troubleshooting atlas and failure pattern map |
| 🧰 App | TXT OS | .txt semantic OS with fast bootstrap |
| 🧰 App | Blah Blah Blah | Abstract and paradox Q&A built on TXT OS |
| 🧰 App | Blur Blur Blur | Text to image generation with semantic control |
| 🏡 Onboarding | Starter Village | Guided entry point for new users |
If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.
say “next page” when ready.