WFGY/ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/Chatbots_CX/README.md

8.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Chatbots & CX — Global Fix Map

🏥 Quick Return to Emergency Room

You are in a specialist desk.
For full triage and doctors on duty, return here:

Think of this page as a sub-room.
If you want full consultation and prescriptions, go back to the Emergency Room lobby.

Chatbot and CX bugs are structural failures in dialog systems, where intent routing, slot/entity state, conversation memory, connector metadata, or knowledge retrieval breaks even when the underlying LLM is fine.

Most incidents come from environment drift, schema mismatches, cold-start latency, connector desync, and weak policy fences. This folder maps symptoms to vendor pages and WFGY structural fixes with measurable acceptance targets.


When to use this folder

  • Bot flows break across environments (dev vs prod vs staging).
  • Slot filling, entities, or context reset unexpectedly.
  • Latency or cold starts cause dropped conversations.
  • Omnichannel connectors desync with the core bot.
  • Prompts bypass policies or hallucinate unsafe outputs.
  • Regression after migration to a new vendor framework.

Acceptance targets

  • Intent recognition F1 ≥ 0.85 across test set.
  • ΔS(user_query, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 for all routes.
  • Coverage of knowledge base ≥ 0.70 after repair.
  • λ remains convergent across 3 paraphrases and 2 seeds.
  • p95 latency ≤ 800 ms across channels, warm path.
  • Zero PII leakage in logs or vector payloads.

Quick routes — per chatbot vendor

Vendor / Platform Fix Page
Amazon Lex amazon_lex.md
Azure Bot Service azure_bot_service.md
Dialogflow CX dialogflow_cx.md
Freshchat freshchat.md
Freshdesk freshdesk.md
Intercom intercom.md
Microsoft Copilot Studio microsoft_copilot_studio.md
Rasa rasa.md
Salesforce Einstein Bots salesforce_einstein_bots.md
Twilio Studio twilio_studio.md
Watsonx Assistant watsonx_assistant.md
Zendesk zendesk.md

Symptom → exact fix

Symptom Likely cause Open this
Slot filling fails randomly Missing entity fallback, context reset dialogflow_cx.md · rasa.md
Bot replies too slowly Cold starts, webhook bottlenecks amazon_lex.md · azure_bot_service.md
Knowledge base answers drift Retrieval misaligned with store watsonx_assistant.md · retrieval-traceability.md
Omnichannel flow desync Connectors drop metadata intercom.md · zendesk.md
Unsafe or off-policy replies No policy fences or prompt injection microsoft_copilot_studio.md · prompt-injection.md
Migration broke production Schema mismatch, missing idempotency serverless_ci_cd.md · env_bootstrap_and_migrations.md
Conversation history disappears Stateless KV pattern missing stateless_kv_queue_patterns.md

Fix in 60 seconds

  1. Verify intents — run eval with test utterances, check F1 ≥ 0.85.
  2. Check state — ensure KV queue or context store persists between turns.
  3. Fence prompts — load prompt_injection.md.
  4. Measure latency — split warm vs cold path; provision concurrency if needed.
  5. Cross-channel sync — confirm connectors carry metadata (role, region, tenant).

Copy-paste prompt for chatbot incidents

You have TXT OS and the WFGY Problem Map loaded.

My chatbot incident:
- platform: [Dialogflow|Rasa|Intercom|etc.]
- symptom: [short description]
- eval: { F1, ΔS, coverage, λ states }
- infra: { cold_ms, warm_ms, concurrency, connectors }
- compliance: { pii_found: true|false, policy_eval }

Tell me:
1) which layer is failing and why,
2) the exact WFGY page to open,
3) the minimal steps to restore accuracy and latency,
4) a quick regression test to prevent repeat.

FAQ

Q: My bot answers correctly in dev but fails in production. Why? A: Likely env mismatch — analyzers, slots, or schema drift between environments. Check serverless_ci_cd.md.

Q: How do I stop hallucinations in Copilot Studio or Dialogflow? A: Enforce policy fences and cite-then-explain. See prompt_injection.md.

Q: Why is latency so different on first vs second request? A: Cold starts. See cold_start_concurrency.md.

Q: How can I ensure PII never leaks through connectors? A: Attach privacy_and_pii_edges.md and enforce payload contracts.

Q: Do I need to change my vendor to apply WFGY fixes? A: No. WFGY guardrails are store-agnostic and vendor-agnostic. You patch structure, not infra.


🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1 Download · 2 Upload to your LLM · 3 Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1 Download · 2 Paste into any LLM chat · 3 Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

Layer Page What its for
Proof WFGY Recognition Map External citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof
⚙️ Engine WFGY 1.0 Original PDF tension engine and early logic sketch (legacy reference)
⚙️ Engine WFGY 2.0 Production tension kernel for RAG and agent systems
⚙️ Engine WFGY 3.0 TXT based Singularity tension engine (131 S class set)
🗺️ Map Problem Map 1.0 Flagship 16 problem RAG failure taxonomy and fix map
🗺️ Map Problem Map 2.0 Global Debug Card for RAG and agent pipeline diagnosis
🗺️ Map Problem Map 3.0 Global AI troubleshooting atlas and failure pattern map
🧰 App TXT OS .txt semantic OS with fast bootstrap
🧰 App Blah Blah Blah Abstract and paradox Q&A built on TXT OS
🧰 App Blur Blur Blur Text to image generation with semantic control
🏡 Onboarding Starter Village Guided entry point for new users

If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.
GitHub Repo stars