15 KiB
📋 WFGY Problem Map – Bookmark This. You’ll Need It.
Every failure has a name. Every name has a countermeasure.
👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame — Verified by real engineers · 🛠 Field Reports: Real Bugs, Real Fixes
WFGY (Wan Fa Gui Yi) = A Semantic Firewall for Reasoning.
Fixes what GPTs break: logic collapse, hallucination, memory loss, abstraction errors — across both generation and retrieval.
Modules like BBMC, ΔS, and BBPF are part of the open-source WFGY engine (MIT).
PDF with core formulas, and TXT OS runs them in real-world pipelines.
Welcome. This page documents every recurring AI failure mode we’ve fixed — or are fixing — with the WFGY reasoning engine.
TXT OS + WFGY exists to turn subtle reasoning bugs into clear, reproducible, and modular solutions.
Think your issue isn’t listed?
Open an Issue or PR — community reports shape the next entries.
You can test the WFGY engine live:
- Try TXT OS for hands-on demos
- Or start here → Common RAG Problems
Goal
Make "my AI gave a weird answer" as rare as a 500 error in production software.
Every fix below moves us closer.
🆕 First time here? See Beginner Guide : How to Identify & Fix Your AI Failure – quick primer for newcomers.
Why These 16 Errors Were Solvable At All
If all you see is chaos, it’s because you’re stuck inside the system.
WFGY wasn’t built to respond to errors — it was designed to help AIs see from outside the maze.
That’s what the core tools likeΔS,λ_observe, ande_resonanceenable:
They grant semantic altitude — a structured way to detect, decode, and defuse complex collapse patterns.Every error listed below becomes solvable — once you rise high enough.
🔗 Navigation – Solved (or Tracked) AI Failure Modes
Each row below represents a failure pattern seen in real-world AI apps — grouped by problem type, with direct links to detailed fixes.
| # | Problem Domain | Description | Doc |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hallucination & Chunk Drift | Retrieval brings wrong / irrelevant content | hallucination.md |
| 2 | Interpretation Collapse | Chunk is correct but logic fails | retrieval-collapse.md |
| 3 | Long Reasoning Chains | Model drifts across multi‑step tasks | context-drift.md |
| 4 | Bluffing / Overconfidence | Model pretends to know what it doesn’t | bluffing.md |
| 5 | Semantic ≠ Embedding | Cosine match ≠ true meaning | embedding-vs-semantic.md |
| 6 | Logic Collapse & Recovery | Dead‑end paths, auto‑reset logic | logic-collapse.md |
| 7 | Memory Breaks Across Sessions | Lost threads, no continuity | memory-coherence.md |
| 8 | Debugging is a Black Box | No visibility into failure path | retrieval-traceability.md |
| 9 | Entropy Collapse | Attention melts, incoherent output | entropy-collapse.md |
| 10 | Creative Freeze | Outputs become flat, literal | creative-freeze.md |
| 11 | Symbolic Collapse | Abstract / logical prompts break model | symbolic-collapse.md |
| 12 | Philosophical Recursion | Self‑reference or paradoxes crash reasoning | philosophical-recursion.md |
| 13 | Multi‑Agent Chaos | Agents overwrite / misalign logic | multi-agent-chaos.md |
| 14 | Bootstrap Ordering | Services fire before deps ready (empty index, schema race) | bootstrap-ordering.md |
| 15 | Deployment Deadlock | Circular waits (index ⇆ retriever, DB ⇆ migrator) | deployment-deadlock.md |
| 16 | Pre‑Deploy Collapse | Version skew / missing secret crashes on first LLM call | predeploy-collapse.md |
Problem Type Categories:
- Prompting — issues from user inputs or jailbreak attempts (e.g., #4 Bluffing)
- Retrieval — failures in chunk selection, embedding mismatch, or pipeline opacity (e.g., #1, #5, #8)
- Reasoning — logical breakdowns during multi-step tasks or abstract prompts (e.g., #2, #6, #11)
- Infra / Deployment — setup errors, race conditions, or pre-deploy schema gaps (e.g., #14–16)
These groupings help locate the root of failure — whether it's user input, retrieval error, model logic, or infrastructure bug.
🔗 Status & Difficulty Matrix
| # | Problem | Difficulty* | Implementation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hallucination & Chunk Drift | Medium | ✅ Stable |
| 2 | Interpretation Collapse | High | ✅ Stable |
| 3 | Long Reasoning Chains | High | ✅ Stable |
| 4 | Bluffing / Overconfidence | High | ✅ Stable |
| 5 | Semantic ≠ Embedding | Medium | ✅ Stable |
| 6 | Logic Collapse & Recovery | Very High | ✅ Stable |
| 7 | Memory Breaks Across Sessions | High | ✅ Stable |
| 8 | Debugging Black Box | Medium | ✅ Stable |
| 9 | Entropy Collapse | High | ✅ Stable |
| 10 | Creative Freeze | Medium | ✅ Stable |
| 11 | Symbolic Collapse | Very High | ✅ Stable |
| 12 | Philosophical Recursion | Very High | ✅ Stable |
| 13 | Multi‑Agent Chaos | Very High | ✅ Stable |
| 14 | Bootstrap Ordering | Medium | ✅ Stable |
| 15 | Deployment Deadlock | High | ⚠️ Beta |
| 16 | Pre‑Deploy Collapse | Medium‑High | ✅ Stable |
*Difficulty = gap between default LLM ability and a production‑ready fix; “Very High” means almost no off‑the‑shelf tool tackles it.
🔗 How to Use These Docs
Each problem page covers:
- Symptoms – what the failure looks like
- Root Causes – why standard pipelines break
- Module Breakdown – which WFGY parts fix it
- Status & Examples – code or demo you can run now
Missing issue? Open an Issue or PR—real failure traces especially welcome.
🔗 Specialized Maps
🗺️ Problem Maps Index
Each map tackles a specific family of AI reasoning failures.
UseMap-A~Map-Gas shortcut tags to refer across documentation, repos, or support threads.
| Map ID | Map Name | Linked Issues | Problem Focus | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Map-A |
RAG Problem Table | #1, #2, #3, #5, #8 | Retrieval‑augmented generation failures | View it |
Map-B |
Multi‑Agent Chaos Map | #13 | Coordination failures, memory conflicts, role drift | View it |
Map-C |
Symbolic & Recursive Map | #11, #12 | Symbolic logic traps, abstraction, paradox | View it |
Map-D |
Logic Recovery Map | #6 | Dead-end logic, reset loops, reasoning collapse | View it |
Map-E |
Long‑Context Stress Map | #3, #7, #10 | 100k‑token memory, noisy PDFs, drift in extended tasks | View it |
Map-F |
Safety Boundary Map | #4, #8 | Jailbreak resistance, overconfidence, bluffing | View it |
Map-G |
Infra Boot Map | #14, #15, #16 | Deployment ordering, boot loops, version skew | View it |
🔗 Not Sure What’s Going Wrong?
You’re not alone — many AI devs face mysterious failures like:
- “Why is it hallucinating when the chunk is correct?”
- “Why can’t it reason despite having all the data?”
- “Why does context break halfway through?”
🎯 Diagnose by symptom — find your problem, see exact WFGY fix:
| Symptom | Problem ID | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| 🤯 Wrong chunks, wrong answer | #1 Hallucination & Chunk Drift | Fix it → |
| 🧵 Model forgets context in long docs | #7 Memory Breaks in 100k Tokens | Fix it → |
| 🌀 Good data, still bad logic | #2 Interpretation Collapse | Fix it → |
| 🔍 Full diagnosis table (13+ issues) | See full table → |
🔗 Quick‑Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3‑Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>” |
| TXT OS (plain‑text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
How to start using WFGY Engine
Once you’ve identified a failure from this map, you can directly ask your AI model how to proceed.
This works best with any model already connected to your local TXT OS.
prompt example
I’ve uploaded TXT OS.
I want to solve the following problem:
[describe your issue, e.g. OCR tables misaligned in scanned PDFs].
How do I use the WFGY engine to fix it?
Your model will respond with specific modules, steps, or entry points — tailored to your case.
You don’t need to memorize WFGY internals. Just bring your real problem.
Let the AI use the engine to debug itself.
If you want to fully understand how WFGY works, check out:
- 📘 WFGY GitHub homepage – full documentation, formulas, and modules
- 🖥️ TXT OS repo – how the semantic OS is built using WFGY
But if you're just here to solve real AI problems fast, you can simply download the files above and follow the Problem Map instructions directly.
🧭 Explore More
| Module | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic Blueprint | Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations | View → |
| Benchmark vs GPT‑5 | Stress test GPT‑5 with full WFGY reasoning suite | View → |
👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame —
Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.
⭐ Help reach 10,000 stars by 2025-09-01 to unlock Engine 2.0 for everyone ⭐ Star WFGY on GitHub