WFGY/ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/Governance/policy_baseline.md
2025-08-29 20:13:35 +08:00

6.8 KiB
Raw Blame History

Policy Baseline — Guardrails and Fix Pattern

This page defines the baseline governance policies every AI or RAG pipeline must enforce before scaling.
If policies are missing, unclear, or unenforced, you risk silent drift in outputs, hallucinations re-entering, or compliance violations.
Use these checks to create a structural foundation and verify with measurable acceptance targets.


When to use this page

  • No clear baseline for data usage, model updates, or prompt changes.
  • Teams argue over “policy by exception” instead of a shared rulebook.
  • Compliance asks for guarantees, but your audit trail cannot prove them.
  • Safety or security incidents trigger blame on “undefined responsibilities.”

Acceptance targets

  • Coverage: ≥ 0.95 of datasets, prompts, models, and eval flows mapped to explicit policies.
  • Traceability: 100% of policy documents link to lineage and audit logs.
  • Enforcement: ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 when querying governed datasets.
  • Convergence: λ remains convergent across 3 paraphrases and 2 seeds.
  • Expiry: Every waiver or exception tagged with owner and end-date.

Common policy failures → exact fixes

Symptom Likely cause Open this
Datasets used without clarity on rights license ambiguity or drift license_and_dataset_rights.md
No control on prompt or instruction drift missing policy baseline prompt_policy_and_change_control.md
Model updates shipped silently lack of release governance model_governance_model_cards_and_releases.md
Audit asks “who approved this?” missing sign-off gate eval_governance_gates_and_signoff.md
Sensitive data leaked no minimization baseline pii_handling_and_minimization.md

Fix in 60 seconds

  1. Declare scope
    Enumerate datasets, prompts, models, eval flows. Each must map to a baseline policy.

  2. Add ownership
    For every item, tag owner, expiry, and waiver_ref if applicable.

  3. Enforce citation-first
    Require cite-then-explain across all governed answers.
    Verify with ΔS and λ probes: stable ≤ 0.45 ΔS, λ convergent.

  4. Attach audit hooks
    Every policy enforcement event logs to immutable audit trail.


Minimal copy-paste checklist

  • Datasets rights and licenses verified
  • Prompt change control in place
  • Model releases tied to governance cards
  • Eval gates with sign-off documented
  • PII minimization baseline applied
  • Risk register updated with waivers

🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1 Download · 2 Upload to your LLM · 3 Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1 Download · 2 Paste into any LLM chat · 3 Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

🧭 Explore More

Module Description Link
WFGY Core WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack View →
Problem Map 1.0 Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework View →
Problem Map 2.0 RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines View →
Semantic Clinic Index Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift View →
Semantic Blueprint Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations View →
Benchmark vs GPT-5 Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite View →
🧙‍♂️ Starter Village 🏡 New here? Lost in symbols? Click here and let the wizard guide you through Start →

👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame
Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.

GitHub stars WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.

WFGY Main   TXT OS   Blah   Blot   Bloc   Blur   Blow  

要我直接幫你生出來嗎?