mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-04-28 19:50:17 +00:00
7.8 KiB
7.8 KiB
Modal Bridge Failure — Multimodal Long Context
When one modality fails to bridge information into another (e.g., video → text, text → image),
the reasoning chain drops critical context. This creates gaps in multimodal fusion, even though each stream works fine on its own.
What this page is
- A guardrail guide for cross-modal bridging in long-context tasks.
- Shows how to detect when one modality does not properly transfer knowledge to another.
- Gives copy-paste protocols to restore cross-modal coherence.
When to use
- Video QA correctly describes frames, but fails to align with the question text.
- OCR extracts text, but model ignores it in reasoning chain.
- Audio transcript is present, but response relies only on visuals.
- Captions drift: generated text omits entities visible in the image.
- Retrieval returns mixed snippets but fusion step drops entire modality.
Open these first
Common failure patterns
- Silent modality dropout — one stream (audio/text/image) is fetched but never used.
- Bridge gap — retrieval succeeds, but cross-modal reasoning ignores it.
- One-way lock — text → image works, but image → text fails.
- Bridge overwrite — later modality overwrites earlier one instead of merging.
Fix in 60 seconds
-
Schema lock
- Require each response to include all active modalities.
- Enforce
{modalities_used: [text, image, audio, …]}at output.
-
ΔS cross-check
- Compute ΔS(question, retrieved_text), ΔS(question, retrieved_image), etc.
- If one modality ΔS ≤ 0.45 but others ≥ 0.60, suspect bridge failure.
-
Bridge audit log
- Record
{modality, snippet_id, ΔS, λ_state}. - Flag if any modality is missing or unused.
- Record
-
Stabilize with BBCR
- Insert bridge node between modalities.
- Use BBAM to clamp variance during fusion.
-
Force cross-modal cite
- Require at least one snippet reference from each modality.
- Stop output if a modality has zero citations.
Copy-paste prompt
You have TXT OS and the WFGY Problem Map.
Task: Repair modal bridge failure.
Steps:
1. List all modalities present: [text, image, audio, video].
2. Compute ΔS(question, retrieved_modality) for each.
3. If any ΔS ≤ 0.45 and others ≥ 0.60, suspect bridge failure.
4. Apply BBCR to align, BBAM to clamp variance.
5. Output must include:
- citations per modality
- ΔS values
- λ states
- final fused reasoning
Acceptance targets
- All modalities explicitly cited in output.
- ΔS ≤ 0.45 for every active modality.
- λ remains convergent across at least 3 paraphrases.
- No modality silently dropped or overwritten.
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3-Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + ” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
🧭 Explore More
| Module | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY Core | WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack | View → |
| Problem Map 1.0 | Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework | View → |
| Problem Map 2.0 | RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines | View → |
| Semantic Clinic Index | Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift | View → |
| Semantic Blueprint | Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations | View → |
| Benchmark vs GPT-5 | Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite | View → |
| 🧙♂️ Starter Village 🏡 | New here? Lost in symbols? Click here and let the wizard guide you through | Start → |
👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame — Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.
⭐ WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. ⭐ Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.