6.5 KiB
Regulatory Alignment — Guardrails and Fix Pattern
This page defines how to align AI pipelines with existing laws, sector regulations, and compliance regimes.
Most AI failures at scale are not purely technical but compliance drift — your pipeline silently breaks GDPR, HIPAA, or copyright law because logging or schema fences were never enforced.
When to use this page
- Your system must prove compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, or EU AI Act.
- Clients demand explainable outputs and data provenance.
- Auditors request reproducibility and risk registers.
- You operate in finance, healthcare, or government sectors with strict controls.
Acceptance targets
- 100% of data sources have a license_id and jurisdiction field.
- Provenance chain covers ingestion → embedding → retrieval → generation.
- Risk register includes bias, privacy, and IP risks with owner assignment.
- Queries and outputs auditable within 5 minutes.
- Alignment tests run weekly against updated compliance checklists.
Common failures → exact fixes
| Symptom | Likely cause | Open this |
|---|---|---|
| Data from EU not separated or anonymized | missing residency fence | data_residency.md |
| Private health data leaks in logs | no PHI redaction | privacy_and_pii_edges.md |
| Citations omit license or source | ingestion lacks rights | license_and_dataset_rights.md |
| Retrieval answers drift from contract | schema not enforced | data-contracts.md |
| Bias audit fails on specific cohorts | no structured probes | eval_playbook.md |
Fix in 60 seconds
-
Residency + anonymization
Partition datasets by region. Strip identifiers. -
Provenance chain
Loglicense_id,jurisdiction,ingest_date,index_hash. -
Bias + privacy probes
Weekly run λ stability tests across demographic variants. -
Risk register
Maintain an owner, severity, and mitigation plan per risk. -
Alignment replay
Prove a query followed rules by replaying citations and logs.
Minimal compliance checklist
- All ingestion jobs include
license_idandjurisdiction. - GDPR/CCPA consent tracked in logs.
- Health/finance data use sector schemas.
- Bias probes run weekly, logged with ΔS and λ.
- Audit replay tested monthly with compliance team.
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3-Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
🧭 Explore More
| Module | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY Core | WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack | View → |
| Problem Map 1.0 | Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework | View → |
| Problem Map 2.0 | RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines | View → |
| Semantic Clinic Index | Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift | View → |
| Semantic Blueprint | Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations | View → |
| Benchmark vs GPT-5 | Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite | View → |
| 🧙♂️ Starter Village 🏡 | New here? Lost in symbols? Click here and let the wizard guide you through | Start → |
👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame —
Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.
⭐ WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. ⭐ Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.
要我繼續幫你生成嗎?