6.4 KiB
Entropy Collapse — Long Window Drift & Attention Melt
When context windows stretch to 50k–100k tokens or more, attention variance rises and the model smooths meaning.
This page shows how to detect entropy melt and repair reasoning before collapse spreads.
When to use this page
- Dialogs degrade gradually as token count increases.
- Citations look correct but answers become vague or repetitive.
- Long technical transcripts lose specific numbers or symbols.
- Responses swing between over-detailed and generic filler.
- Reasoning chains stall after ~30–40 hops.
Core acceptance targets
- ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 at each step.
- Retrieval coverage ≥ 0.70 to intended section.
- λ stays convergent across three paraphrases.
- Entropy (variance of attention weights) remains bounded.
- No collapse in chains ≤ 40 steps.
Structural fixes
-
Measure entropy
Track variance of attention weights across layers. Rising variance = early melt. -
Clamp with BBAM
Apply variance clamp when ΔS drifts upward or entropy rises beyond baseline. -
Bridge with BBCR
If reasoning halts, bridge to a stable anchor section and re-anchor the chain. -
Shard long windows
Split into{system | task | snippets | answer}. Enforce snippet fences per section. -
Triangulate anchors
Compare ΔS(question, anchor) vs ΔS(question, decoy). If close, re-chunk and re-embed.
Fix in 60 seconds
-
Probe entropy
Compute variance of attention weights. Alert if variance > baseline by 20%. -
Apply BBAM
Clamp variance. If ΔS ≥ 0.60, lock schema and retry. -
Anchor with BBCR
If collapse detected, bridge back to known stable anchor node. -
Re-split context
Force sections bysection_id. Forbid cross-section reuse. -
Verify stability
Expect ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45, λ convergent, entropy flat.
Copy-paste prompt
You have TXT OS and the WFGY Problem Map.
Goal: Detect and repair entropy collapse in long contexts.
Protocol:
1. Compute ΔS(question, retrieved).
2. Report entropy variance vs baseline.
3. If variance ↑ or ΔS ≥ 0.60:
* Apply BBAM to clamp
* If reasoning halts, use BBCR to bridge anchor
4. Split prompts by section, forbid cross-section reuse.
5. Report:
* ΔS(question, retrieved)
* entropy variance
* λ states (retrieve, assemble, reason)
* final answer with citations
Common failure patterns
- Entropy melt: answers flatten to “it depends…” filler.
- Boundary blur: context merges across joins, citations misalign.
- Long-chain stall: after 30+ hops, λ flips divergent.
- Ghost repetitions: same phrase reappears across sections.
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3-Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
🧭 Explore More
| Module | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY Core | WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack | View → |
| Problem Map 1.0 | Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework | View → |
| Problem Map 2.0 | RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines | View → |
| Semantic Clinic Index | Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift | View → |
| Semantic Blueprint | Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations | View → |
| Benchmark vs GPT-5 | Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite | View → |
| 🧙♂️ Starter Village 🏡 | New here? Lost in symbols? Click here and let the wizard guide you through | Start → |
👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame —
Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.
⭐ WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. ⭐ Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.