WFGY/ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/LLM_Providers/meta_llama.md

9.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

Meta Llama: Guardrails and Fix Patterns

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of LLM_Providers.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

This page gives an operational checklist for Meta Llama based assistants inside RAG and agent stacks. It maps the usual failure modes to concrete WFGY fixes and acceptance targets.

Acceptance targets

  • ΔS(question, retrieved_context) ≤ 0.45
  • Coverage of retrieved vs target section ≥ 0.70
  • λ_observe stays convergent across 3 paraphrases
  • E_resonance flat on long windows

Common failure patterns seen with Llama setups

  1. Plausible but wrong answers even when chunks look fine
    Map to: Interpretation Collapse and Hallucination & Chunk Drift.
    Check also Embedding ≠ Semantic and the Retrieval Playbook.

  2. Degradation in long dialogs or large context
    Map to: Context Drift and Entropy Collapse.

  3. Role loss after tool calls or agent hops
    Map to: Multi-Agent Problems and deep dive Role Drift.

  4. Overconfident answers without citations
    Map to: Bluffing / Overconfidence. Enforce traceable schemas with Retrieval Traceability and Data Contracts.

  5. Hybrid retrieval oscillation, high similarity but wrong meaning
    Map to: Embedding ≠ Semantic and Rerankers. Tune using the Retrieval Playbook.

  6. Cross-source merging and leakage
    Map to: Symbolic Constraint Unlock pattern
    SCU pattern with strict Data Contracts.

  7. Tokenizer or locale mismatch on non-English corpora
    Map to: Multilingual Guide and re-probe with Embedding ≠ Semantic.


WFGY repair map for Llama


Quick triage steps

  1. Probe ΔS(question, retrieved_context). If ≥ 0.60 open:
    Embedding ≠ Semantic and Hallucination.

  2. Vary k in {5, 10, 20} and chart ΔS vs k. Flat-high curve points to index or metric mismatch
    Retrieval Playbook.

  3. If chunks are correct but logic is wrong, mark λ at reasoning and apply BBCR + BBAM
    Interpretation Collapse and Logic Collapse.

  4. For long dialogs, verify joins with ΔS ≤ 0.50 and clamp variance
    Context Drift and Entropy Collapse.

  5. If sources bleed, enforce SCU and per-section fences
    SCU pattern and Retrieval Traceability.


Minimal safe prompt you can paste


I uploaded TXT OS. Read WFGY formulas and Problem Map pages.
My stack runs on Meta Llama.

symptom: \[describe]
traces: \[ΔS probes, λ states, short logs]

Tell me:

1. the failing layer and why,
2. the exact WFGY page to open next,
3. the minimal steps to push ΔS ≤ 0.45 with convergent λ,
4. how to verify the fix with a reproducible test.


Escalation and ops


🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1 Download · 2 Upload to your LLM · 3 Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1 Download · 2 Paste into any LLM chat · 3 Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

Layer Page What its for
Proof WFGY Recognition Map External citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof
Engine WFGY 1.0 Original PDF based tension engine
Engine WFGY 2.0 Production tension kernel and math engine for RAG and agents
Engine WFGY 3.0 TXT based Singularity tension engine, 131 S class set
Map Problem Map 1.0 Flagship 16 problem RAG failure checklist and fix map
Map Problem Map 2.0 RAG focused recovery pipeline
Map Problem Map 3.0 Global Debug Card, image as a debug protocol layer
Map Semantic Clinic Symptom to family to exact fix
Map Grandmas Clinic Plain language stories mapped to Problem Map 1.0
Onboarding Starter Village Guided tour for newcomers
App TXT OS TXT semantic OS, fast boot
App Blah Blah Blah Abstract and paradox Q and A built on TXT OS
App Blur Blur Blur Text to image with semantic control
App Blow Blow Blow Reasoning game engine and memory demo

If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools. GitHub Repo stars