Redundant Evidence Collapse: Guardrails and Fix Pattern

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of Reasoning.
To reorient, go back here:

Reasoning — multi-step inference and symbolic proofs

WFGY Global Fix Map — main Emergency Room, 300+ structured fixes

WFGY Problem Map 1.0 — 16 reproducible failure modes

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

When many near-identical snippets flood the context, the model over-trusts repetition and ignores minority evidence. Plans drift, citations skew to one source, and answers flatten. Use this page to dedupe, cap source dominance, and keep reasoning balanced.

Open these first

Visual map and recovery
→ rag-architecture-and-recovery.md
End to end retrieval knobs
→ retrieval-playbook.md
Traceability and payload schema
→ retrieval-traceability.md
→ data-contracts.md
Related retrieval failures
→ duplication_and_near_duplicate_collapse.md · pattern_vectorstore_fragmentation.md · hybrid_retriever_weights.md
Reasoning stability tools
→ chain-of-thought-variance-clamp.md · anchoring-and-bridge-proofs.md · context-stitching-and-window-joins.md

Symptoms

Symptom	What you see
Majority echo	70–90 percent of citations come from one source family
Minority facts vanish	Correct but less frequent evidence never appears in the answer
Plan flips with k	Increasing top-k changes conclusion even though meaning is the same
Reruns reshuffle	Same inputs but different top-k mixes cause different claims
JSON plan collapses	One long “summarize all” step instead of compare and weigh

Why it happens

Near-duplicate clutter. Chunks differ in offsets but carry the same claim.
Per-source dominance. One document type or site overruns the window.
No cluster caps. Reranker optimizes relevance, not diversity.
Free-form plan. Planner merges collect and decide into a single step.
No minority probe. Chains never force a best counterexample search.
λ not observed. Variance looks like disagreement instead of imbalance.

Acceptance targets

Coverage of target section ≥ 0.70 and includes at least 1 minority citation when conflicts exist
Per-source cap ≤ 40 percent of active snippets in any window
Near-duplicate rate ≤ 10 percent by cluster (Jaccard or embedding distance)
ΔS(question, selected_evidence) ≤ 0.45 and flat when k varies between 8 and 24
λ remains convergent across three paraphrases and two seeds

Fix in 60 seconds

Cluster and cap
Cluster snippets by {source_id, section_id} and by semantic LSH. Keep top 1–2 per cluster. Cap any source family at 40 percent of window size.
→ duplication_and_near_duplicate_collapse.md
Deterministic tie break
After rerank, order by (doc_id, section_id, win_idx) so runs are stable.
→ rerankers.md
Split plan into compare then decide
Use BBAM to clamp step count. Stage A collects balanced evidence, Stage B decides.
→ chain-of-thought-variance-clamp.md
Minority probe
Force a counterexample search step if all retained snippets agree.
→ anchoring-and-bridge-proofs.md
Contract the payload
Require {cluster_id, source_family, is_counterexample} in snippet schema.
→ data-contracts.md

Minimal evidence selection contract

Your retrieval or pre-planner must emit this structure. Enforce it before planning.

{
  "k_requested": 24,
  "clusters": [
    {"cluster_id": "c1", "source_family": "siteA", "members": ["s1","s5","s9"], "kept": ["s1"]},
    {"cluster_id": "c2", "source_family": "siteB", "members": ["s2","s7"], "kept": ["s2"]},
    {"cluster_id": "c3", "source_family": "pdf",  "members": ["s3","s4","s8"], "kept": ["s3","s4"]}
  ],
  "cap": {"per_source_pct": 40},
  "order_rule": "doc_id,section_id,win_idx",
  "minority_probe_required": true
}

Rules

Keep at most 2 per cluster unless the cap allows and clusters are small.
If all kept snippets agree on the main claim, inject a counterexample search.
Planner receives only the kept set, not the full cluster members.

Verification playbook

Run with k = 8, 16, 24. After clustering and caps, citations remain balanced and the conclusion does not flip.
At least one minority citation appears when conflicting evidence exists.
ΔS(question, selected_evidence) ≤ 0.45 on all runs.
λ convergent across three paraphrases and two seeds.
If ΔS is flat and high after caps, suspect index or metric mismatch. → embedding-vs-semantic.md · chunking-checklist.md

Copy paste prompt

You have TXT OS and the WFGY Problem Map loaded.

Goal: prevent redundant-evidence collapse by clustering, capping source dominance, and forcing a minority probe.

Inputs:
- question: "{q}"
- snippets: [{snippet_id, doc_id, section_id, source_family, win_idx, ΔS_to_question, text}]

Do:
1) Cluster near-duplicates by text overlap and semantic distance. Assign cluster_id.
2) Keep at most 2 per cluster. Enforce per-source cap ≤ 40% of retained snippets.
3) Order retained snippets by (doc_id, section_id, win_idx).
4) If all retained snippets agree on the main claim, perform a targeted counterexample search and add at most 1 minority snippet.
5) Produce a two-stage plan:
   - Stage A: collect-balanced-evidence (fixed length, no free text steps)
   - Stage B: decide-and-cite (cannot change step count; must cite then explain)

Return JSON:
{
  "retained": [{"snippet_id":"s1","cluster_id":"c1","source_family":"siteA"}, ...],
  "minority_probe": true|false,
  "plan_rev": n,
  "λ_state": "convergent|divergent",
  "ΔS_selected_evidence": 0.xx,
  "coverage": 0.xx,
  "answer": "... cite then explain ..."
}
If λ is divergent or ΔS ≥ 0.60, name the exact fix page to open next.

Common gotchas

Reranker trained for relevance only. Add a diversity factor or post-cluster filter.
Window joins drop the minority snippet. Re-anchor at joins with BBCR micro bridges. → context-stitching-and-window-joins.md
Free text tools let the planner merge steps. Clamp with BBAM and strict enums.
Payload lacks source_family so caps cannot be enforced. Extend the contract.
Hybrid retrieval without tuned weights amplifies one retriever. → hybrid_retriever_weights.md

When to escalate

Even after caps, two sources disagree and ΔS stays ≥ 0.60. → rebuild chunks and verify store metric. Open: embedding-vs-semantic.md · duplication_and_near_duplicate_collapse.md

🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool	Link	3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF	Engine Paper	1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + ”
TXT OS (plain-text OS)	TXTOS.txt	1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

Layer	Page	What it’s for
Proof	WFGY Recognition Map	External citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof
Engine	WFGY 1.0	Original PDF based tension engine
Engine	WFGY 2.0	Production tension kernel and math engine for RAG and agents
Engine	WFGY 3.0	TXT based Singularity tension engine, 131 S class set
Map	Problem Map 1.0	Flagship 16 problem RAG failure checklist and fix map
Map	Problem Map 2.0	RAG focused recovery pipeline
Map	Problem Map 3.0	Global Debug Card, image as a debug protocol layer
Map	Semantic Clinic	Symptom to family to exact fix
Map	Grandma’s Clinic	Plain language stories mapped to Problem Map 1.0
Onboarding	Starter Village	Guided tour for newcomers
App	TXT OS	TXT semantic OS, fast boot
App	Blah Blah Blah	Abstract and paradox Q and A built on TXT OS
App	Blur Blur Blur	Text to image with semantic control
App	Blow Blow Blow	Reasoning game engine and memory demo

If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.

12 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape