6.5 KiB
Hybrid Retrieval Failure — Guardrails and Fix Pattern
🧭 Quick Return to Map
You are in a sub-page of RAG.
To reorient, go back here:
- RAG — retrieval-augmented generation and knowledge grounding
- WFGY Global Fix Map — main Emergency Room, 300+ structured fixes
- WFGY Problem Map 1.0 — 16 reproducible failure modes
Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.
When hybrid retrieval (BM25 + dense, HyDE + reranker, multi-vector) performs worse than a single retriever.
Instead of increasing recall, the hybrid path introduces instability, wrong ranking, or noisy snippets.
Open these first
- Visual map and recovery: RAG Architecture & Recovery
- End to end retrieval knobs: Retrieval Playbook
- Traceability schema: Retrieval Traceability
- Snippet contracts: Data Contracts
- Query path splits: Pattern: Query Parsing Split
- Ranking drift: Rerankers
Core acceptance
- Hybrid recall ≥ single retriever recall
- ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 for top-1 result
- λ stable across three paraphrases and two seeds
- Coverage ≥ 0.70 to the target section
Typical symptoms → exact fix
| Symptom | Likely cause | Open this |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid returns unrelated snippet | query parsing split not locked | Pattern: Query Parsing Split |
| Hybrid recall < single recall | wrong weighting or missing normalization | Retrieval Playbook |
| Dense retriever dominates BM25 | metric mismatch | Embedding ≠ Semantic |
| Reranker undoes good hits | λ flips, entropy collapse | Rerankers, Entropy Collapse |
Fix in 60 seconds
-
Measure baseline
Run BM25 alone and dense alone. Log coverage and ΔS. If hybrid < baseline, do not ship. -
Stabilize query parsing
Split HyDE prompts, keyword queries, and dense embeddings into deterministic branches. Lock weighting ratios. -
Reranker probe
Compare recall before and after reranker. If entropy rises, clamp with variance control or drop reranker. -
Enforce snippet schema
Always requiresnippet_id,section_id,offsets,tokens. Hybrid paths must normalize schema fields.
Copy-paste probe prompt
I uploaded TXT OS and the WFGY Problem Map.
My issue:
- hybrid retrieval returns worse results than BM25 or dense alone.
Tell me:
1) which layer fails (query parsing, weighting, reranker),
2) which WFGY fix page to open,
3) minimal steps to restore ΔS ≤ 0.45 and coverage ≥ 0.70,
4) reproducible test with BM25 vs dense vs hybrid.
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3-Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + ” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
Explore More
| Layer | Page | What it’s for |
|---|---|---|
| Proof | WFGY Recognition Map | External citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof |
| Engine | WFGY 1.0 | Original PDF based tension engine |
| Engine | WFGY 2.0 | Production tension kernel and math engine for RAG and agents |
| Engine | WFGY 3.0 | TXT based Singularity tension engine, 131 S class set |
| Map | Problem Map 1.0 | Flagship 16 problem RAG failure checklist and fix map |
| Map | Problem Map 2.0 | RAG focused recovery pipeline |
| Map | Problem Map 3.0 | Global Debug Card, image as a debug protocol layer |
| Map | Semantic Clinic | Symptom to family to exact fix |
| Map | Grandma’s Clinic | Plain language stories mapped to Problem Map 1.0 |
| Onboarding | Starter Village | Guided tour for newcomers |
| App | TXT OS | TXT semantic OS, fast boot |
| App | Blah Blah Blah | Abstract and paradox Q and A built on TXT OS |
| App | Blur Blur Blur | Text to image with semantic control |
| App | Blow Blow Blow | Reasoning game engine and memory demo |
If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools.