vrr/WFGY
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git synced 2026-04-28 11:40:07 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 4
WFGY/ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/auto-repair/README.md
PSBigBig + MiniPS 125c9d17a3
Update README.md
2026-03-13 19:44:29 +08:00

12 KiB
Raw Blame History

Auto Repair v1

🛠️ Auto Repair v1 is the first formal controlled-repair package built on top of the Atlas fix system.

This folder does not claim that fully autonomous repair is already solved.

What it does claim is narrower and more useful:

the Atlas now has a clear path from
route → first repair direction → repair planning → validation → rollback / escalation

This folder exists to define that path clearly, safely, and in a way that can grow without silently breaking the current system.

What Auto Repair means here

In this project, auto repair does not mean:

  • an AI blindly changing prompts
  • an AI guessing random fixes
  • an AI claiming full root-cause closure by itself
  • a magic one-shot repair engine
  • unrestricted autonomous intervention

Instead, Auto Repair means:

a structured repair layer that starts after Atlas routing and turns diagnosis into a controlled repair workflow

In practical terms, the intended flow is:

  1. route the case with the Atlas
  2. identify the likely failure family and broken invariant
  3. choose the most appropriate first repair family
  4. generate a constrained repair plan
  5. validate whether the repair improved the case
  6. accept, revise, rollback, or escalate if needed

So this folder is not a replacement for the Atlas.

It is the next layer that depends on Atlas routing being correct first.

Where this sits in the full system

The current system can be understood like this:

Problem Map 3.0
→ Troubleshooting Atlas
→ Canonical Casebook
→ Atlas-to-AI Adapter
→ Fix Surface
→ Auto Repair
→ WFGY 3.0 deeper continuation

The key distinction is:

  • Atlas decides where the failure belongs
  • Fix Surface suggests the first repair direction
  • Auto Repair turns that into a structured repair workflow
  • WFGY 3.0 remains the deeper repair and experiment grammar for harder or more structurally unresolved cases

This means Auto Repair is a bridge layer, not the final repair engine.

Short version:

Atlas finds where the failure lives. Auto Repair decides the first controlled move. WFGY 3.0 continues when local repair is not enough.

Current status of v1

📌 Current status: first formal controlled-repair package established

Auto Repair v1 is no longer just a vague planning note.

At this stage, this folder already defines and includes:

  • architecture
  • repair action schema
  • validation loop
  • rollback discipline
  • planner specification
  • planner prompt
  • repair plan schema
  • semi-auto repair scope
  • safe early action catalog
  • tiny validation examples
  • tiny rollback examples
  • planner test and review notes
  • tiny planner output examples
  • tiny semi-auto demo spec
  • tiny semi-auto demo pack
  • Atlas-to-WFGY bridge
  • worked escalation examples
  • quickstart for WFGY deeper continuation
  • integrated handoff
  • freeze boundary note

So v1 is still intentionally limited, but it is no longer just “future idea space.”

It is now a real structured package.

What this folder already delivers

A. Core structure layer

This layer defines what Auto Repair is and how it should grow.

Files include:

  • auto-repair-architecture-v1.md
  • repair-action-schema-v1.md
  • repair-validation-loop-v1.md
  • rollback-policy-v1.md
  • auto-repair-roadmap-v1.md

B. Planner and scope layer

This layer defines how diagnosis becomes first repair planning.

Files include:

  • repair-planner-spec-v1.md
  • repair-planner-prompt-v1.md
  • repair-plan-schema-v1.json
  • semi-auto-repair-scope-v1.md
  • safe-early-action-catalog-v1.md

C. Example and review layer

This layer makes the planner, validation, and rollback logic visible and testable.

Files include:

  • tiny-validation-examples-pack-v1.md
  • tiny-rollback-examples-pack-v1.md
  • planner-test-note-v1.md
  • planner-review-checklist-v1.md
  • tiny-planner-output-examples-pack-v1.md

D. Demo and bridge layer

This layer shows how the system becomes visible, teachable, and bridgeable into deeper WFGY continuation.

Files include:

  • tiny-semi-auto-demo-spec-v1.md
  • tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md
  • atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md
  • worked-escalation-example-v1.md
  • worked-escalation-example-f4-v1.md
  • wfgy-3-0-deeper-continuation-quickstart-v1.md

E. Package boundary and handoff layer

This layer defines how the package should be read, handed off, and frozen.

Files include:

  • auto-repair-integrated-handoff-v1.md
  • auto-repair-freeze-note-v1.md

Why this folder matters

🧭 The Atlas already does something very important:

  • it classifies failures
  • it distinguishes neighboring failure regions
  • it suggests the first repair move

But there is still a gap between:

“this is probably an F4 failure”

and

“here is a safe, structured, validation-aware repair workflow for that F4 failure”

This folder exists to close that gap.

It is the place where the project begins to move from:

  • diagnosis only

toward:

  • diagnosis plus controlled repair planning

That shift is a big deal, so it needs its own clear layer.

Scope of Auto Repair v1

Included in v1

✅ Auto Repair v1 currently covers:

  • system positioning
  • architecture explanation
  • planner layer
  • repair action schema direction
  • validation loop direction
  • rollback discipline
  • semi-auto repair scope
  • safe early action catalog
  • tiny example packs
  • tiny demo packs
  • Atlas-to-WFGY bridge logic
  • worked escalation examples
  • quickstart continuation guidance
  • freeze and handoff boundary

Not included in v1

⏳ Auto Repair v1 does not yet include:

  • full executable repair engine
  • broad autonomous patch generation
  • broad automated verification across all families
  • full closed-loop autonomous repair
  • aggressive high-risk intervention for F6-heavy regions
  • benchmark-scale repair orchestration
  • production-grade executor logic
  • notebook-grade or live execution for all demo paths

So this README describes a real v1 package, but not a final autonomous repair engine.

Best early candidate families

For early Auto Repair development, the safest and strongest starting regions remain:

F1 · Grounding & Evidence Integrity

Good early targets:

  • re-grounding
  • evidence filtering
  • anchor re-check
  • chunk-to-target correction

Why it is a good first target:

  • the repair surface is relatively concrete
  • before / after comparison is easier
  • misrepair is easier to detect

F4 · Execution & Contract Integrity

Good early targets:

  • readiness gate insertion
  • ordering validation
  • block-until-ready logic
  • closure-path hardening

Why it is a good first target:

  • many failures are workflow-structural
  • repair actions are often explicit
  • success conditions are often clear

F7 · Representation & Localization Integrity

Good early targets:

  • schema tightening
  • JSON shell correction
  • descriptor tightening
  • container validation

Why it is a good first target:

  • structure is often visible
  • repair outcomes are inspectable
  • replay demos are easier to build

Higher-risk regions

Some areas should still be treated much more carefully.

F5

Auto Repair can help with:

  • observability uplift
  • trace insertion
  • logging suggestions

But there is risk in mistaking visibility improvement for full repair.

F3

Some continuity scaffolds may be possible, but deeper continuity repair can get complicated quickly.

F6

🚫 This is not a good place for aggressive early auto repair.

Boundary-heavy cases often require:

  • judgment
  • intervention restraint
  • explicit escalation
  • stronger human review

Early F6 work should lean toward:

  • planner mode
  • warning mode
  • stabilization suggestions

not broad automatic execution.

Relationship to WFGY 3.0

This is one of the most important parts of the folder.

Auto Repair should not be misread as replacing WFGY 3.0.

The correct relationship is:

  • Atlas handles diagnosis
  • Auto Repair handles the first controlled repair move
  • WFGY 3.0 handles deeper continuation when local repair is insufficient

This usually happens when:

  • local repair helps only partially
  • the deeper effective-layer encoding remains weak
  • stronger observables are needed
  • mismatch logic remains too shallow
  • the case keeps returning revise, rollback, or escalate
  • local fixes improve symptoms without stabilizing structure

Official WFGY 3.0 TXT

Use this official TXT as the deeper continuation asset:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/onestardao/WFGY/refs/heads/main/TensionUniverse/WFGY-3.0_Singularity-Demo_AutoBoot_SHA256-Verifiable.txt

Shortest practical reading:

Start with Atlas. Try the first controlled Auto Repair move. If local repair is not enough, continue with WFGY 3.0.

Recommended reading order

If you are new to this folder, read in this order.

Step 1 · Foundation

  1. README.md
  2. auto-repair-architecture-v1.md
  3. auto-repair-roadmap-v1.md

Step 2 · Operational core

  1. repair-action-schema-v1.md
  2. repair-validation-loop-v1.md
  3. rollback-policy-v1.md

Step 3 · Planner layer

  1. repair-planner-spec-v1.md
  2. repair-planner-prompt-v1.md
  3. repair-plan-schema-v1.json

Step 4 · Scope and action shelf

  1. semi-auto-repair-scope-v1.md
  2. safe-early-action-catalog-v1.md

Step 5 · Tiny evidence layer

  1. tiny-validation-examples-pack-v1.md
  2. tiny-rollback-examples-pack-v1.md
  3. planner-test-note-v1.md
  4. planner-review-checklist-v1.md
  5. tiny-planner-output-examples-pack-v1.md

Step 6 · Demo and bridge layer

  1. tiny-semi-auto-demo-spec-v1.md
  2. tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md
  3. atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md
  4. worked-escalation-example-v1.md
  5. worked-escalation-example-f4-v1.md
  6. wfgy-3-0-deeper-continuation-quickstart-v1.md

Step 7 · Freeze and handoff layer

  1. auto-repair-integrated-handoff-v1.md
  2. auto-repair-freeze-note-v1.md

Safety boundary

⚠️ Auto Repair must stay disciplined.

The following rules remain non-negotiable:

  1. Route first, repair second Auto Repair should never skip Atlas routing.

  2. First controlled move only Early versions should focus on the first repair move, not pretend to solve everything.

  3. Validation is mandatory A repair proposal without a validation path is incomplete.

  4. Rollback must exist If a repair makes the system worse, the workflow must support backing out.

  5. Not all families are equally safe for early semi-auto repair F1, F4, and F7 remain the best early targets.

  6. No silent WFGY escalation If a case escalates into WFGY 3.0, that transition should be explicit and justified.

What future work should not do

Future work should not do the following:

  • silently rewrite the core workflow
  • overclaim autonomous repair
  • treat tiny demos as proof of full repair power
  • push F6-heavy intervention too early
  • blur Atlas, Auto Repair, and WFGY 3.0 into one vague layer

The layered relationship is one of the most valuable parts of the whole design.

What future work should do

Recommended next directions include:

  • thicken the action library
  • add more worked escalation examples
  • improve WFGY continuation guidance
  • grow from tiny markdown demos toward replay / JSON / notebook demos
  • define a future constrained executor boundary without pretending it already exists

Official v1 interpretation

The correct interpretation of Auto Repair v1 is:

the first formal controlled-repair package for Atlas-based repair has now been established, but broad autonomous repair execution remains future work.

This wording is strong, honest, and safe.

One-line status

Auto Repair v1 is now established as the first controlled repair layer between Atlas diagnosis and deeper WFGY 3.0 continuation.

Back to the Atlas

For the full Atlas system, go back to:

  • ProblemMap/wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md
  • ProblemMap/Atlas/README.md

If you like the project, ⭐ star the repo and follow the Atlas branch as it grows.