mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-05-01 21:11:11 +00:00
2.7 KiB
2.7 KiB
🧠 Problem: The System Doesn’t Know What It Doesn’t Know
📍Context
In most RAG or LLM systems, when the retrieved content is unrelated, incomplete, or silent — the model still gives an answer.
Why? Because it lacks awareness of knowledge boundaries.
Symptoms:
- Confident answers in absence of data
- No fallback when query hits unknown territory
- No self-check of "Do I have enough info to proceed?"
🚨 Why This Happens
| Cause | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| No semantic awareness | Models only know tokens, not semantic voids |
| No boundary detection | There's no signal when you're beyond mapped knowledge |
| No fallback behavior | It answers anyway — even if it's blind |
✅ WFGY Solution
WFGY is designed around knowledge boundary awareness, not blind generation.
It detects:
- When a question targets unmapped logic space
- When input doesn’t connect to semantic trees
- When ΔS is undefined or extremely high
🔍 Key Mechanisms
1. λ_observe + ΔS
- If semantic link = null or ΔS > 1.0 → system raises
unknownflag - This prevents hallucination under knowledge voids
2. Semantic Tree Gaps
- When no Tree node anchors the current input → system returns "no valid node"
3. Fallback Prompts
- WFGY has internal logic like:
"This topic hasn't been covered. Would you like to provide a source or anchor?"
Instead of bluffing — it engages.
🛠 Try It Yourself
Step 1 — Start WFGY console
> Start
Step 2 — Ask an unrelated, high-level or domain-specific question
> "Does your refund policy apply to crypto hardware devices from non-partner vendors?"
Step 3 — See what happens
Expected behavior:
- System detects topic is not covered
- ΔS is too high → boundary warning
- May ask for user to upload new doc or clarify
🔬 Example Output
Your input appears to reference a domain not mapped in current memory.
Would you like to upload a document or clarify the scope?
🔗 Related Modules
λ_observe— Structural state monitorΔS— Semantic tension indicatorSemantic Tree— Verifiable topic anchoringBBCR— Prevents reasoning under unknown premises
📌 Status
| Feature | Status |
|---|---|
| Semantic void detection | ✅ working |
| ΔS overflow fallback | ✅ working |
| Boundary prompt logic | ✅ basic |
| Auto Tree expansion | ⚠️ planned (future module) |
✍️ Summary
WFGY knows when it doesn’t know. This awareness is the difference between safe logic and hallucination risk.