5.3 KiB
Chunking to Embedding Contract — Guardrails and Fix Pattern
🧭 Quick Return to Map
You are in a sub-page of RAG_VectorDB.
To reorient, go back here:
- RAG_VectorDB — vector databases for retrieval and grounding
- WFGY Global Fix Map — main Emergency Room, 300+ structured fixes
- WFGY Problem Map 1.0 — 16 reproducible failure modes
Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.
Use this page when retrieval fails because the chunk schema is not aligned with the embedding ingestion contract.
If the retriever expects fields that were never embedded, or chunks omit IDs/offsets/anchors, then citations drift and ΔS rises.
Open these first
- Visual map and recovery: RAG Architecture & Recovery
- Snippet and citation schema: data-contracts.md
- Retrieval traceability: retrieval-traceability.md
- Chunking checklist: chunking-checklist.md
Core acceptance
- Every chunk has
chunk_id,section_id,source_url,offsets,tokens. - Embedding index was built from the same schema as retrieval contract.
- ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 across 3 paraphrases.
- Coverage ≥ 0.70 to the target section.
Typical breakpoints and the right fix
-
Missing fields in ingestion (e.g., no
section_id)
→ Enforce data-contracts.md. -
Different schema for ingest vs retrieve
→ Corpus ingested raw text, retriever expects chunk JSON → rebuild with schema. -
Offsets not tracked
→ Cannot map back to original document → enforceoffsetsat ingest. -
Tokenizer drift
→ Chunk IDs differ between preprocessing runs → use chunking-checklist.md.
Fix in 60 seconds
-
Check ingestion schema
Compare the fields stored in the index with the fields expected in retrieval. -
Align contracts
Definechunk = {chunk_id, section_id, source_url, offsets, tokens, text}.
Enforce that this exact object is used both in ingestion and retrieval. -
Rebuild index if misaligned
If fields differ, re-ingest corpus with enforced schema.
Copy-paste schema
{
"chunk_id": "uuid-v4",
"section_id": "doc-23-sec-7",
"source_url": "https://example.com/doc23",
"offsets": [120, 320],
"tokens": 512,
"text": "...."
}
Target: retriever always returns this schema, LLM consumes directly.
Common gotchas
- Only
textembedded, no IDs → cannot trace back → citations drift. - Chunk boundaries not logged → hallucinations reappear.
- JSON schema updated mid-deploy → index mismatch.
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3-Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to your LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
Explore More
| Module | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY Core | Canonical framework entry point | View |
| Problem Map | Diagnostic map and navigation hub | View |
| Tension Universe Experiments | MVP experiment field | View |
| Recognition | Where WFGY is referenced or adopted | View |
| AI Guide | Anti-hallucination reading protocol for tools | View |
If this repository helps, starring it improves discovery for other builders.