WFGY/ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/Cloud_Serverless/serverless_ci_cd.md
2026-03-06 21:25:44 +08:00

9.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Serverless CI/CD Guardrails

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of Cloud_Serverless.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

Serverless platforms simplify infrastructure but often hide deployment complexity behind CI/CD pipelines.
When build steps, environment configuration, and rollout order are not carefully controlled, deployments can appear successful while services fail at runtime.

This page provides guardrails to make serverless CI/CD pipelines predictable, observable, and safe to roll out across regions.


When to use this page

  • Deployments succeed but the first requests fail.
  • New releases break environment variables or secrets.
  • Serverless functions deploy but cannot reach dependencies.
  • CI pipelines run migrations and application rollout simultaneously.
  • Canary deployment passes but full rollout causes failures.

Open these first


Acceptance targets

  • CI pipeline completes without manual intervention.
  • Deployment artifacts reproducible across environments.
  • No increase in error rate after rollout.
  • Environment variables and secrets consistent across revisions.
  • Canary deployment accurately predicts full rollout behavior.

For RAG pipelines:

  • ΔS(question, retrieved) drift ≤ 0.03 after deploy.
  • Index versions identical across environments before traffic.

Fix in 60 seconds

  1. Separate build, migration, and deploy stages

    CI pipelines must isolate artifact build, schema migration, and application rollout.

  2. Version artifacts explicitly

    Every deploy should carry:

    • release_id
    • schema_rev
    • index_hash
  3. Use canary deployments

    Roll out to a small percentage of traffic before global rollout.

  4. Gate deploy on health probes

    Services should not receive traffic until environment variables, secrets, and dependencies verify successfully.

  5. Enable automated rollback

    If error rate or latency spikes, pipeline must revert automatically.


Patterns that work

  • Immutable build artifacts

    Build once and promote the same artifact across staging and production.

  • Pipeline stage contracts

    Each stage verifies artifacts, migrations, and health before continuing.

  • Canary plus gradual rollout

    Deploy first to a small subset of users or a single region.

  • Deployment freeze windows

    Prevent simultaneous deploys across services that share dependencies.


Typical breakpoints → exact fix

  • Deploy succeeds but service crashes immediately

    Environment variables missing or incompatible.

    Open:
    Pre-Deploy Collapse


  • Pipeline deadlocks waiting for services

    Deploy order incorrect or circular dependency exists.

    Open:
    Deployment Deadlock


  • Migration and deploy run simultaneously

    Application reads partially migrated schema.

    Open:
    Bootstrap Ordering


  • Canary passes but full rollout fails

    Canary environment differs from production configuration.

    Open:
    Data Contracts


Minimal recipes you can copy

A) CI pipeline stages

Pipeline stages

1. Build artifact
2. Run tests
3. Execute migrations
4. Deploy canary revision
5. Verify health probes
6. Gradual rollout
7. Promote release

B) Deployment contract

Deployment metadata

release_id = r2025-08-30
schema_rev = sc-21
index_hash = a1b2c3

Services start only if versions match expected values.

C) Rollback rule

Rollback trigger

If error_rate > baseline + 2%
or latency > SLO threshold

Then:
- revert to previous revision
- pause pipeline
- alert operator

Observability you must add

  • Deployment success and rollback metrics.
  • Error rate by revision.
  • Environment variable mismatch detection.
  • CI pipeline duration and stage failure counts.
  • Canary vs production performance comparison.

Verification

  • Deployment completes with no service restarts.
  • Canary and full rollout metrics match expected behavior.
  • Environment variables consistent across revisions.
  • No schema mismatches or runtime configuration errors.

When to escalate

  • CI pipeline repeatedly fails in the same stage.
  • Deployments succeed but services remain unhealthy.
  • Canary behavior diverges significantly from production.
  • Rollback fails or leaves system in inconsistent state.

Investigate environment configuration, pipeline orchestration, and dependency readiness before retrying deploy.


🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1 Download · 2 Upload to your LLM · 3 Ask “Answer using WFGY + ”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1 Download · 2 Paste into any LLM chat · 3 Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

Explore More

Layer Page What its for
Proof WFGY Recognition Map External citations, integrations, and ecosystem proof
⚙️ Engine WFGY 1.0 Original PDF tension engine and early logic sketch
⚙️ Engine WFGY 2.0 Production tension kernel for RAG and agent systems
⚙️ Engine WFGY 3.0 TXT based Singularity tension engine
🗺️ Map Problem Map 1.0 Flagship 16 problem RAG failure taxonomy
🗺️ Map Problem Map 2.0 Global Debug Card
🗺️ Map Problem Map 3.0 AI troubleshooting atlas
🧰 App TXT OS .txt semantic OS
🧰 App Blah Blah Blah Abstract Q&A
🧰 App Blur Blur Blur Text-to-image generation
🏡 Onboarding Starter Village Guided entry

If this repository helped, starring it improves discovery so more builders can find the docs and tools. GitHub Repo stars