WFGY/ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/LLM_Providers/meta_llama.md
2025-09-05 10:59:38 +08:00

11 KiB
Raw Blame History

Meta Llama: Guardrails and Fix Patterns

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of LLM_Providers.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

This page gives an operational checklist for Meta Llama based assistants inside RAG and agent stacks. It maps the usual failure modes to concrete WFGY fixes and acceptance targets.

Acceptance targets

  • ΔS(question, retrieved_context) ≤ 0.45
  • Coverage of retrieved vs target section ≥ 0.70
  • λ_observe stays convergent across 3 paraphrases
  • E_resonance flat on long windows

Common failure patterns seen with Llama setups

  1. Plausible but wrong answers even when chunks look fine
    Map to: Interpretation Collapse and Hallucination & Chunk Drift.
    Check also Embedding ≠ Semantic and the Retrieval Playbook.

  2. Degradation in long dialogs or large context
    Map to: Context Drift and Entropy Collapse.

  3. Role loss after tool calls or agent hops
    Map to: Multi-Agent Problems and deep dive Role Drift.

  4. Overconfident answers without citations
    Map to: Bluffing / Overconfidence. Enforce traceable schemas with Retrieval Traceability and Data Contracts.

  5. Hybrid retrieval oscillation, high similarity but wrong meaning
    Map to: Embedding ≠ Semantic and Rerankers. Tune using the Retrieval Playbook.

  6. Cross-source merging and leakage
    Map to: Symbolic Constraint Unlock pattern
    SCU pattern with strict Data Contracts.

  7. Tokenizer or locale mismatch on non-English corpora
    Map to: Multilingual Guide and re-probe with Embedding ≠ Semantic.


WFGY repair map for Llama


Quick triage steps

  1. Probe ΔS(question, retrieved_context). If ≥ 0.60 open:
    Embedding ≠ Semantic and Hallucination.

  2. Vary k in {5, 10, 20} and chart ΔS vs k. Flat-high curve points to index or metric mismatch
    Retrieval Playbook.

  3. If chunks are correct but logic is wrong, mark λ at reasoning and apply BBCR + BBAM
    Interpretation Collapse and Logic Collapse.

  4. For long dialogs, verify joins with ΔS ≤ 0.50 and clamp variance
    Context Drift and Entropy Collapse.

  5. If sources bleed, enforce SCU and per-section fences
    SCU pattern and Retrieval Traceability.


Minimal safe prompt you can paste


I uploaded TXT OS. Read WFGY formulas and Problem Map pages.
My stack runs on Meta Llama.

symptom: \[describe]
traces: \[ΔS probes, λ states, short logs]

Tell me:

1. the failing layer and why,
2. the exact WFGY page to open next,
3. the minimal steps to push ΔS ≤ 0.45 with convergent λ,
4. how to verify the fix with a reproducible test.


Escalation and ops


🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1 Download · 2 Upload to your LLM · 3 Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1 Download · 2 Paste into any LLM chat · 3 Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

🧭 Explore More

Module Description Link
WFGY Core WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack View →
Problem Map 1.0 Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework View →
Problem Map 2.0 RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines View →
Semantic Clinic Index Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift View →
Semantic Blueprint Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations View →
Benchmark vs GPT-5 Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite View →

👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame
Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.

GitHub stars WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.

WFGY Main   TXT OS   Blah   Blot   Bloc   Blur   Blow