WFGY/ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/LLM_Providers/aws_bedrock.md
2025-09-05 10:58:31 +08:00

11 KiB
Raw Blame History

ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/LLM_Providers/aws_bedrock.md

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of LLM_Providers.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

AWS Bedrock: Guardrails and Fix Patterns

Use this page when failures look providerspecific in AWS Bedrock. Typical cases are mismatched model routing (Claude, Llama, Mistral, etc.), JSON schema drift, tool-call latency, throttle ceilings, or region/IAM issues that masquerade as “reasoning bugs.” Each fix maps to WFGY pages so you can verify with measurable targets.

Open these first


Fix in 60 seconds

  1. Measure ΔS
  • Compute ΔS(question, retrieved) and ΔS(retrieved, expected anchor).
  • Targets: stable < 0.40, transitional 0.400.60, risk ≥ 0.60.
  1. Probe with λ_observe
  • Vary k ∈ {5, 10, 20}. Flat high curve → index or metric mismatch.
  • Reorder prompt headers. If ΔS spikes, lock the schema.
  1. Apply the module
  • Retrieval drift → BBMC + Data Contracts.
  • Reasoning collapse → BBCR bridge + BBAM variance clamp.
  • Dead ends in long runs → BBPF alternate path.
  1. Verify
  • Coverage to target section ≥ 0.70.
  • ΔS ≤ 0.45 within three paraphrases.
  • λ stays convergent across seeds and sessions.

Typical Bedrock breakpoints (and the right fix)

  • Model routing not what you think
    Invoking anthropic.claude-* vs meta.llama-* vs mistral.* changes tokenizer, max tokens, and tool-call behavior. If outputs flip between routes, pin the model id per task, then re-check with Logic Collapse and Retrieval Traceability.

  • JSON schema drift in tool use
    Claude via Bedrock is strict on JSON when toolChoice is forced. Lock the output schema with Data Contracts and add a BBCR bridge step that rejects non-conformant fields.

  • Latency spikes → hidden timeouts
    Region hop or Guardrails policy checks can add latency. Use small test prompts and trace λ per step. If λ diverges only when tools are enabled, set a shorter planning window and split tools by namespace. See ops/live_monitoring_rag.md.

  • Bedrock “Guardrails” over-filtering
    Safety filters can truncate citations or code blocks. If citations vanish, lower the filter aggressiveness, then enforce source-only answers with Retrieval Traceability and the SCU pattern (symbolic constraint unlock).

  • Context windows differ across routes
    If the same prompt collapses only on one model family, shrink the active window and re-chunk. Validate with Context Drift and Entropy Collapse.

  • IAM or region misconfig → “reasoning” looks random
    On silent fallbacks or throttling, the agent loops. Install a BBCR checkpoint that asserts model id, region, and rate state before long chains. If it fails, exit early and surface infra status. See bootstrap-ordering and predeploy-collapse.


Provider knobs and minimal recipes

  • Pin model and cap tokens

    • One task, one model id. Keep a per-task max tokens map.
    • If you must swap models, add BBPF to branch at the planner step, not mid-reasoning.
  • Force citations first

    • Use citation-first headers and the snippet schema from Retrieval Traceability.
    • Reject answers without snippet ids. That alone removes most “looks like hallucination” cases.
  • Defuse prompt injection

    • Apply the injection checklist and keep tools off until the source set is locked. See prompt-injection.md.
  • Rerank aggressively

    • Many Bedrock routes benefit from tighter top-k ordering. Use Rerankers and then re-test ΔS across 3 paraphrases.

Escalation path


Copy-paste prompt (safe)


I uploaded TXT OS and the WFGY ProblemMap files.

My Bedrock issue:

* symptom: \[brief]
* traces: \[ΔS(question,retrieved)=..., ΔS(retrieved,anchor)=..., λ states]

Tell me:

1. which layer is failing and why,
2. which exact fix page to open from this repo,
3. the minimal steps to push ΔS ≤ 0.45 and keep λ convergent,
4. how to verify the fix with a reproducible test.

Use BBMC/BBPF/BBCR/BBAM when relevant.


Acceptance targets

  • Coverage to target section ≥ 0.70
  • ΔS(question, retrieved) ≤ 0.45 within three paraphrases
  • λ remains convergent across seeds and sessions
  • E_resonance flat on long windows

🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1 Download · 2 Upload to your LLM · 3 Ask “Answer using WFGY + ”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1 Download · 2 Paste into any LLM chat · 3 Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

🧭 Explore More

Module Description Link
WFGY Core WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack View →
Problem Map 1.0 Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework View →
Problem Map 2.0 RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines View →
Semantic Clinic Index Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift View →
Semantic Blueprint Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations View →
Benchmark vs GPT-5 Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite View →
🧙‍♂️ Starter Village 🏡 New here? Lost in symbols? Click here and let the wizard guide you through Start →

👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame
Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.

GitHub stars WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.

WFGY Main   TXT OS   Blah   Blot   Bloc   Blur   Blow