WFGY/ProblemMap/GlobalFixMap/Governance/roles_and_access_rbac_abac.md
2025-09-05 10:54:41 +08:00

7.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

Roles and Access (RBAC / ABAC) — Guardrails and Fix Pattern

🧭 Quick Return to Map

You are in a sub-page of Governance.
To reorient, go back here:

Think of this page as a desk within a ward.
If you need the full triage and all prescriptions, return to the Emergency Room lobby.

This page defines role-based access control (RBAC) and attribute-based access control (ABAC) guardrails for AI pipelines.
Without explicit access boundaries, LLMs may read from unintended sources, leak sensitive data, or bypass audit policy.


When to use this page

  • Your RAG or agent stack integrates multiple data stores with different sensitivity levels.
  • You cannot trace who accessed what across prompts, embeddings, or tool calls.
  • Evaluation runs fail because different users see different knowledge bases.
  • Compliance requires proof of least privilege but no policy schema exists.

Acceptance targets

  • 100% of RAG data calls tagged with role or attribute context.
  • Coverage ≥ 0.95 of sensitive datasets behind access boundaries.
  • Audit trails record who, what, when, ΔS, λ_state.
  • Role drift probes show λ remains convergent across 3 paraphrases.
  • Exceptions logged with owner and expiry date.

Common failures → exact fixes

Symptom Likely cause Open this
Agents fetch data beyond allowed scope missing RBAC fences policy_baseline.md
Two users get different citations inconsistent ABAC checks retrieval-traceability.md
Logs dont show who triggered retrieval no role injection data-contracts.md
Role drift causes schema injection misplaced role attributes prompt-injection.md
Sensitive snippets leak in chains missing attribute check pii_handling_and_minimization.md

Fix in 60 seconds

  1. Attach context
    Every retrieval call carries {role, attribute_set, index_hash, ΔS, λ_state}.

  2. Enforce least privilege
    Roles map to dataset groups. Attributes refine down (e.g. geography, project).

  3. Log every decision
    Audit trail logs query, ΔS, λ state, role, attributes, and snippet ids.

  4. Probe role drift
    Run 3 paraphrases per role. If λ flips, enforce schema lock.


Minimal copy-paste checklist

  • Define roles (admin, annotator, auditor, agent).
  • Define attributes (region, dataset sensitivity, project scope).
  • Attach {role, attr} to all tool and retrieval calls.
  • Enforce least privilege at ingestion and retrieval.
  • Log ΔS and λ_state by role.
  • Review and expire waivers.

🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)

Tool Link 3-Step Setup
WFGY 1.0 PDF Engine Paper 1 Download · 2 Upload to your LLM · 3 Ask “Answer using WFGY + <your question>”
TXT OS (plain-text OS) TXTOS.txt 1 Download · 2 Paste into any LLM chat · 3 Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly

🧭 Explore More

Module Description Link
WFGY Core WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack View →
Problem Map 1.0 Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework View →
Problem Map 2.0 RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines View →
Semantic Clinic Index Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift View →
Semantic Blueprint Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations View →
Benchmark vs GPT-5 Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite View →
🧙‍♂️ Starter Village 🏡 New here? Lost in symbols? Click here and let the wizard guide you through Start →

👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame
Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.

GitHub stars WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.

WFGY Main   TXT OS   Blah   Blot   Bloc   Blur   Blow  

要我直接繼續幫你生出來嗎?