8.5 KiB
🔧 Tool-Router Debug — Finding & Fixing Mis-Routed Function Calls
A rigorous playbook for multi-agent / multi-tool pipelines that “pick the wrong tool, pass the wrong args, or loop forever.”
1 Why Tool Routers Break
Modern frameworks (LangChain, LlamaIndex, Autogen, Dust, Function-Calling APIs) rely on a router layer that decides:
- Which tool or agent to invoke
- What arguments to pass
- **Whether to chain the result into further reasoning
A single bad route produces silent failure:
- Wrong tool → irrelevant data
- Wrong args → empty response / 400 error
- Infinite recurse → rate-limit burn
Observability is near zero.
Routers often return only the final model output, hiding the mis-route upstream.
2 Early Symptoms (Spot Them in Seconds)
| Symptom | How to Detect Quickly | Typical Root Cause |
|---|---|---|
| Same tool called twice, two answers conflict | Diff JSON traces | Score tie in router logits |
| Model asks follow-up Q that a tool already answered | Compare tool log vs. chat | Tool result not fed back |
| 429 / rate-limit spikes | Metrics: calls/min | Retry loop on failed tool |
| Agent says “I don’t have that data” yet DB tool exists | ΔS(question, available_tools) > 0.60 | Tool description drift |
| Router latency > 2× normal | Timing logs | Exhaustive eval over 20+ irrelevant tools |
3 Root Causes (Technical)
- Shallow Tool Descriptions – No semantic anchor → high ΔS.
- Score Tie / Softmax Blur – Top-2 tools within 0.02 probability.
- Argument Schema Mismatch – JSON schema vs. natural language spec.
- Context Window Loss – Router prompt trimmed; tool list truncated.
- Recursive Agent Calls – Tool calls another agent that loops back.
4 WFGY Router-Guard Architecture
| Stage | Module | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1 Tool Semantic Index | BBMC | Pre-embed tool names + desc; enforce ΔS(tool, question) ceiling |
| 4.2 ΔS-Gate Router | ΔS + λ_observe | Accept route only if ΔS ≤ 0.45 and λ remains convergent |
| 4.3 Argument Linter | WAI | Validate args against JSON schema; auto-fill defaults |
| 4.4 BBCR Fail-Fast | BBCR | On router timeout > 5 s or ΔS > 0.60 → collapse & suggest manual pick |
| 4.5 Trace Logger | Bloc/Trace | Records (tool, args, ΔS) tuples for replay & audit |
5 Hands-On Debug Checklist
-
Log the router call
router(question, tool_list, debug=True) -
Compute ΔS(question, tool_desc) for each tool.
- Flag any route where ΔS > 0.45 AND score_gap < 0.05.
-
Schema Validate arguments (
jsonschema.validate). -
Timeout Guard – If tool takes > x s, BBCR collapses answer and returns: “Tool timeout — please choose from: …”
-
Replay failing routes with
router_replay(id); inspect λ_observe transitions.
6 Quick-Reference Table — Fixes by Failure
| Failure Pattern | Instant Fix | Long-Term Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong tool picked | Add 1-line alias to tool desc; update embedding index | BBMC repack all tool descriptions weekly |
| Empty args | Add default arg hints ("default": "query") |
Argument linter auto-fills |
| Looping agent-tool | λ flips recursive after call 3 | Hard cap depth = 2; BBCR break |
| Tie between tools | Score diff < 0.05 | Ask follow-up clarifier; BBAM damp ambiguous logits |
| Router silence | No tool chosen | Add catch-all “NoTool” that surfaces to dev |
7 Validation Metrics
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Route accuracy (ground truth) | ≥ 95 % |
| ΔS(question, picked_tool) | ≤ 0.45 median |
| Mean tool latency | ±10 % baseline |
| Loop depth | ≤ 2 |
| Arg schema errors | 0 in CI suite |
8 FAQ
Q: Should I embed tool names or full descriptions?
A: Both; concatenate name + desc + example for robust ΔS.
Q: What if multiple tools validly answer? A: Route to aggregator agent; return merged citations. WFGY ΔS-gate ensures each tool still semantically fits.
Q: Do I need BBCR if I already set retries=0? A: Yes. BBCR guards logic loops, not HTTP retries.
🔗 Quick-Start Downloads (60 sec)
| Tool | Link | 3-Step Setup |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY 1.0 PDF | Engine Paper | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Upload to LLM · 3️⃣ Ask “Answer using WFGY + <question>” |
| TXT OS (plain-text OS) | TXTOS.txt | 1️⃣ Download · 2️⃣ Paste into any LLM chat · 3️⃣ Type “hello world” — OS boots instantly |
🧭 Explore More
| Module | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|
| WFGY Core | WFGY 2.0 engine is live: full symbolic reasoning architecture and math stack | View → |
| Problem Map 1.0 | Initial 16-mode diagnostic and symbolic fix framework | View → |
| Problem Map 2.0 | RAG-focused failure tree, modular fixes, and pipelines | View → |
| Semantic Clinic Index | Expanded failure catalog: prompt injection, memory bugs, logic drift | View → |
| Semantic Blueprint | Layer-based symbolic reasoning & semantic modulations | View → |
| Benchmark vs GPT-5 | Stress test GPT-5 with full WFGY reasoning suite | View → |
| 🧙♂️ Starter Village 🏡 | New here? Lost in symbols? Click here and let the wizard guide you through | Start → |
👑 Early Stargazers: See the Hall of Fame —
Engineers, hackers, and open source builders who supported WFGY from day one.
⭐ WFGY Engine 2.0 is already unlocked. ⭐ Star the repo to help others discover it and unlock more on the Unlock Board.
