WFGY/ProblemMap/Twin_Atlas/demos/ai-eval.md

<!--
AI_NOTE_START

Document role:
This page is the public screenshot-first AI evaluation surface for WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas Engine.

What this page is for:
1. Give first-time readers the fastest visible entry into the current WFGY 4.0 public proof surface.
2. Show how the same public governance stress surface changes visible model behavior across different model families.
3. Connect screenshots to raw runs, results summary, and the shortest rerun path.
4. Help readers verify that WFGY 4.0 is not being presented as theory alone.

What this page is not:
1. It is not a universal benchmark certification page.
2. It is not the full experiment archive.
3. It is not a replacement for raw runs.
4. It is not a replacement for results summary.
5. It is not a claim that every model behaves identically under WFGY 4.0.

Reading strategy:
1. Read the opening summary first.
2. Use the gallery as the first-contact layer.
3. Open raw runs if you want original output wording.
4. Open Results Summary if you want the aggregate interpretation.
5. Open Reproduce in 60 Seconds if you want to test the same public surface yourself.

Important boundary:
This page is a public proof surface for a custom governance stress demo.
It is designed to be visible, inspectable, and reproducible.
It is not a universal benchmark claim page.

AI_NOTE_END
-->

# 📊 AI Eval

> A screenshot-first public proof surface for WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas Engine.

This page exists for one simple reason:

**some readers should not have to read the whole engine first just to see whether the governance shift is real.**

The current AI Eval surface is built around a narrower but very important question:

**what changes when a model is pushed to conclude too early, too strongly, or beyond the evidence boundary?**

This is not a universal benchmark page.

It is a public comparison surface for the current WFGY 4.0 governance stress demo.

## What you should look for

A good rerun is not just one where the AFTER answer looks more careful.

A good rerun should make at least one of these shifts visible:

- less illegal commitment
- less evidence-boundary crossing
- less single-cause compression
- less contradiction suppression
- more lawful downgrade
- stronger preservation of still-live competing explanations

The right reading lens is:

**not softer vs louder**  
**but more lawful vs more premature**

## Why this page matters

The current WFGY 4.0 public surface already includes:

- a public Twin Atlas runtime TXT
- a public governance stress suite TXT
- screenshot comparisons across the current public model set
- model-specific raw runs
- a results-summary layer
- deeper flagship evidence pages

That means this page should be read as a visible proof surface, not as a one-off screenshot wall.

If you want the aggregate read, go to [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md).  
If you want the original outputs, go to [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/).  
If you want to run the same public surface yourself, go to [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md).

## Current Public Gallery

### ChatGPT

**Why it matters**  
A strong public example of lawful downgrade without collapsing into a blanket stop system.

**Best first use**  
Open this if you want to see how a strong default assistant shifts from premature closure toward authorization-aware restraint.

- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/chatgpt.txt)
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/chatgpt_before-after.png)

---

### Claude

**Why it matters**  
One of the clearest public examples of ambiguity preservation and conflict-sensitive restraint under pressure.

**Best first use**  
Open this if you want to see how WFGY 4.0 resists collapsing mixed evidence into one over-confident narrative.

- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/claude.txt)
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/claude_before-after.png)

---

### Gemini

**Why it matters**  
A strong example of downgrade discipline under thin evidence and forced-choice pressure.

**Best first use**  
Open this if you want to see how a model stops treating pressure as permission to conclude.

- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/gemini.txt)
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/gemini_before-after.png)

---

### Grok

**Why it matters**  
A useful public comparison point for attribution pressure, authenticity pressure, and over-commitment control.

**Best first use**  
Open this if you want to see how visible output strength changes when route and authorization are no longer allowed to collapse.

- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/grok.txt)
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/grok_before-after.png)

---

### DeepSeek

**Why it matters**  
A clear public case for stronger evidence-boundary discipline and attribution restraint.

**Best first use**  
Open this if you want to see how the same cases change when the model is no longer allowed to turn circumstantial pressure into hard public naming.

- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/deepseek.txt)
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/deepseek_before-after.png)

---

### Kimi

**Why it matters**  
A strong before-after separation in several pressure-heavy business and evidence-chain cases.

**Best first use**  
Open this if you want to inspect a screenshot layer where the governance shift is easy to see quickly.

- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/kimi.txt)
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/kimi_before-after.png)

---

### Mistral

**Why it matters**  
A useful comparison point for visible output-strength reduction under the same stress surface.

**Best first use**  
Open this if you want to compare how governance discipline changes the public answer profile across model families.

- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/mistral.txt)
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/mistral_before-after.png)

---

### Perplexity

**Why it matters**  
An important public outlier.

**Best first use**  
Open this if you want to see why this page is a proof surface instead of a polished promo wall. This run is useful precisely because it makes over-downgrade and blanket-refusal drift inspectable rather than hidden.

- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/perplexity.txt)
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/perplexity_before-after.png)

## What changed most across the current public screenshot layer

Across the current public runs, the most consistent visible shift is not that the AFTER answer becomes “nicer.”

The more important shift is that the AFTER pass becomes less willing to:

- convert a plausible route into an authorized conclusion
- treat appearance as if it were already proof
- erase live ambiguity just to satisfy pressure
- compress multi-factor situations into one exact cause
- speak above the lawful output ceiling just because the user demanded it

That is the real use of this page.

It is not here to prove that every model became perfect.

It is here to show that the current public WFGY 4.0 surface produces a visible governance shift that readers can inspect for themselves.

## Want to run the same public surface yourself

Use these two files:

- [Twin Atlas Runtime TXT](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-twin-atlas-runtime.txt)
- [Governance Stress Suite TXT](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-governance-stress-suite.txt)

Then follow:

- [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md)

## Important boundary

This page is useful because it is visible, repeatable, and easy to inspect.

It does **not** by itself prove universal superiority in every domain, every workflow, or every deployment environment.

For broader interpretation, use:

- [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md)
- [Governance Stress Suite](../evidence/governance-stress-suite.md)
- [Flagship Cases](../evidence/flagship-cases.md)

## Where to go next

### If you want the aggregate interpretation
- [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md)

### If you want the original model wording
- [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/)

### If you want the shortest rerun path
- [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md)

### If you want the flagship example cases
- [Flagship Cases](../evidence/flagship-cases.md)