vrr/WFGY
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git synced 2026-04-28 03:29:51 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 4

Update worked-escalation-example-v1.md

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig + MiniPS 2026-03-18 23:01:50 +08:00 • committed by GitHub
parent 78e7d94c22
commit 380d321226
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 155 additions and 47 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

202
ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/auto-repair/worked-escalation-example-v1.md
View file

@ -1,31 +1,108 @@
# Worked Escalation Example v1
<!--
AI_NOTE_START
## 0. Document status
Document role:
This file provides the first general worked escalation example for the Auto Repair layer inside the Atlas Fixes package.
This document defines the first worked escalation example for the Atlas Auto Repair layer.
How to use this file:
1. Read this page when you want one concrete case where Atlas routing and one local Auto Repair move are both useful, but still not sufficient.
2. Use this page together with:
- [Atlas Auto Repair to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md)
- [Tiny Semi-Auto Demo Spec v1](./tiny-semi-auto-demo-spec-v1.md)
- [Tiny Semi-Auto Demo Pack v1](./tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md)
- [Repair Validation Loop v1](./repair-validation-loop-v1.md)
- [Rollback Policy v1](./rollback-policy-v1.md)
- [Safe Early Action Catalog v1](./safe-early-action-catalog-v1.md)
3. Use this page as a worked escalation reference, not as a claim that every difficult case should escalate.
What this file is:
- The first general worked escalation example for Atlas → Auto Repair → WFGY 3.0
- A concrete bridge example from local repair into deeper continuation
- A reference case for showing why local repair can be real but still structurally incomplete
What this file is not:
- Not a claim that every difficult case must escalate
- Not a replacement for Atlas routing
- Not proof that local repair is weak or unimportant
- Not proof that WFGY 3.0 guarantees final closure
Reading discipline for AI:
- Preserve the sequence Atlas first, Auto Repair second, WFGY 3.0 third.
- Treat the local repair gain as real signal, not as disposable noise.
- Only escalate because the unresolved remainder is deeper than the first local repair layer.
- Keep the distinction clear between partial improvement and true structural stabilization.
AI_NOTE_END
-->
# Worked Escalation Example v1 🧭
## A concrete case where local repair helps, but deeper continuation is still justified
Quick links:
- [Back to Auto Repair v1 README](./README.md)
- [Back to Fixes Hub](../README.md)
- [Back to Official Fixes](../official/README.md)
- [Back to Atlas landing page](../../../wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md)
- [Back to AI Eval Evidence](../../ai-eval-evidence.md)
- [Back to Atlas Hub](../../README.md)
- [Get the Atlas Router TXT](../../troubleshooting-atlas-router-v1.txt)
- [Open Atlas Auto Repair to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md)
- [Open WFGY 3.0 Deeper Continuation Quickstart v1](./wfgy-3-0-deeper-continuation-quickstart-v1.md)
- [Open Tiny Semi-Auto Demo Spec v1](./tiny-semi-auto-demo-spec-v1.md)
- [Open Tiny Semi-Auto Demo Pack v1](./tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md)
- [Open Repair Validation Loop v1](./repair-validation-loop-v1.md)
- [Open Rollback Policy v1](./rollback-policy-v1.md)
- [Open Safe Early Action Catalog v1](./safe-early-action-catalog-v1.md)
- [Open Worked Escalation Example F4 v1](./worked-escalation-example-f4-v1.md)
---
If the bridge document explains **why WFGY 3.0 belongs after Atlas and Auto Repair**, this page shows **what that transition looks like in one concrete worked case**.
Its purpose is very specific:
> show one case where Atlas routing and a local Auto Repair move are useful,
> but not sufficient,
> and where deeper continuation into WFGY 3.0 becomes justified.
> show one case where Atlas routing and a local Auto Repair move are useful,
> but not sufficient,
> and where deeper continuation into WFGY 3.0 becomes justified
This document does **not** claim that every difficult case must escalate to WFGY 3.0.
It claims something narrower and more useful:
> some cases can be improved locally first,
> but still require deeper encoding, experiment, or structural continuation.
> some cases can be improved locally first,
> but still require deeper encoding, experiment, or structural continuation.
> This is where WFGY 3.0 becomes the correct next layer.
This document should be read together with:
---
- `atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md`
- `tiny-semi-auto-demo-spec-v1.md`
- `tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md`
- `repair-validation-loop-v1.md`
- `rollback-policy-v1.md`
- `safe-early-action-catalog-v1.md`
## Quick start 🚀
### I want the shortest reading
Use this path:
1. read the case summary
2. inspect the Atlas routing
3. inspect the local planner output and selected action
4. inspect the validation result
5. inspect why the final local outcome becomes `escalate`
### I want the stronger bridge reading
Use this page together with:
1. [Atlas Auto Repair to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md)
2. [WFGY 3.0 Deeper Continuation Quickstart v1](./wfgy-3-0-deeper-continuation-quickstart-v1.md)
3. [Worked Escalation Example F4 v1](./worked-escalation-example-f4-v1.md)
Short version:
> Atlas got the first layer right
> local repair created a real gain
> validation showed that gain was only partial
> the unresolved remainder now belongs to deeper continuation
---
@ -41,31 +118,45 @@ The Atlas stack already shows:
But one crucial system question still remains:
> what does a real escalation look like
> what does a real escalation look like
> when local repair helps, but does not actually close the case?
This file exists to answer that.
In short:
> this is the first concrete example of why WFGY 3.0 matters after Atlas and Auto Repair have already done useful work.
> this is the first concrete example of why WFGY 3.0 matters after Atlas and Auto Repair have already done useful work
---
## 2. Escalation principle
## 2. Worked escalation quick map 🗂️
| Layer | What happens in this example |
|---|---|
| Atlas | correctly routes the case into F7 first |
| Auto Repair | chooses a real local shell repair that genuinely helps |
| Validation | shows the gain is only partial, not fake success |
| Escalation decision | concludes the unresolved remainder is deeper than a local shell fix |
| WFGY 3.0 | becomes the correct next layer for deeper representational and encoding continuation |
This page is the right place when the question is **what an honest escalation should look like**, not whether all difficult cases should automatically jump into WFGY 3.0.
---
## 3. Escalation principle
A worked escalation example should show all four of these:
1. Atlas routing was useful
2. Local repair was useful
3. Local repair was not enough
2. local repair was useful
3. local repair was not enough
4. WFGY 3.0 becomes justified for deeper continuation
If any of those four pieces are missing, the example is incomplete.
---
## 3. Chosen example
## 4. Chosen example
This first worked escalation example uses an F7-first case with neighboring F1 pressure.
@ -80,7 +171,7 @@ This makes the transition to WFGY 3.0 very clear.
---
## 4. Case summary
## 5. Case summary
### Case ID
@ -103,7 +194,7 @@ That is exactly the kind of case where escalation should be explicit.
---
## 5. Atlas routing layer
## 6. Atlas routing layer
### Routed diagnosis
@ -127,7 +218,7 @@ This is important, because escalation to WFGY 3.0 should happen **after correct
---
## 6. Auto Repair planner layer
## 7. Auto Repair planner layer
### Planner output
@ -164,7 +255,7 @@ This is exactly what Auto Repair is supposed to do.
---
## 7. Local action layer
## 8. Local action layer
### Selected action
@ -197,11 +288,11 @@ It means the local repair was **insufficient**.
---
## 8. Validation layer
## 9. Validation layer
### Validation result
```json id="jp7uw0"
```json id="njlwm7"
{
"validation_target": "schema validity",
"before_state_summary": "output structure was unstable and could not be consumed reliably",
@ -234,11 +325,11 @@ This is the exact kind of situation where a deeper continuation layer becomes me
---
## 9. Why local repair is not enough
## 10. Why local repair is not enough
This is the most important section in the whole example.
The local Atlas / Auto Repair action improved the shell.
The local Atlas and Auto Repair action improved the shell.
But the case still shows signs that the problem is deeper than shell repair alone.
@ -260,7 +351,7 @@ That is the reason to escalate.
---
## 10. Escalation decision
## 11. Escalation decision
### Final local outcome
@ -276,13 +367,13 @@ Escalation is correct because:
4. the unresolved remainder points to deeper structural inadequacy
5. further progress now benefits from WFGY 3.0 rather than repeated shallow shell edits
This is not escalation because the case is “interesting.”
This is not escalation because the case is interesting.
It is escalation because the local repair layer has reached its limit.
It is escalation because the local repair layer has reached its honest limit.
---
## 11. WFGY 3.0 continuation rationale
## 12. WFGY 3.0 continuation rationale
At this point, WFGY 3.0 becomes the correct continuation layer because the remaining problem is no longer only:
@ -311,23 +402,21 @@ That is classic WFGY territory.
---
## 12. Official WFGY 3.0 continuation asset
## 13. Official WFGY 3.0 continuation asset
### Official TXT
```text
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/onestardao/WFGY/refs/heads/main/TensionUniverse/WFGY-3.0_Singularity-Demo_AutoBoot_SHA256-Verifiable.txt
```
* [WFGY 3.0 Singularity Demo TXT](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/onestardao/WFGY/refs/heads/main/TensionUniverse/WFGY-3.0_Singularity-Demo_AutoBoot_SHA256-Verifiable.txt)
This TXT should be treated as the official deeper continuation pack.
---
## 13. Recommended escalation handoff prompt
## 14. Recommended escalation handoff prompt
Use the following handoff pattern when escalating this case.
```text id="0z7k4i"
```text id="vpkfj6"
The case below has already been routed through Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas.
Atlas result:
@ -359,11 +448,11 @@ This keeps the transition disciplined.
---
## 14. Recommended system prompt for escalation mode
## 15. Recommended system prompt for escalation mode
Use this if you want the AI to operate in a bridge-aware escalation mode.
```text id="brjlwm"
```text id="nk7w49"
You are continuing a case that has already passed through Atlas diagnosis and one local Auto Repair attempt.
Your job is not to redo Atlas from scratch.
@ -384,11 +473,11 @@ Rules:
---
## 15. Worked escalation object
## 16. Worked escalation object
For compact reuse, the whole escalation can be summarized like this:
```json id="4h83xa"
```json id="4zkjlwm"
{
"example_id": "WEE_F7_001",
"atlas_result": {
@ -414,7 +503,7 @@ For compact reuse, the whole escalation can be summarized like this:
---
## 16. Why this example matters
## 17. Why this example matters
This worked escalation example matters because it proves five things at once.
@ -442,7 +531,7 @@ That last point is especially important.
---
## 17. What this example does not claim
## 18. What this example does not claim
This example does **not** claim:
@ -460,7 +549,7 @@ That is the correct scope.
---
## 18. Recommended next step
## 19. Recommended next step
Once this file exists, the next useful follow-up is probably one of these:
@ -476,6 +565,25 @@ because that would show the bridge is not only about F7-style representational c
---
## 19. One-line summary
## 20. Next steps ✨
After this page, most readers continue with:
1. [Open Worked Escalation Example F4 v1](./worked-escalation-example-f4-v1.md)
2. [Open WFGY 3.0 Deeper Continuation Quickstart v1](./wfgy-3-0-deeper-continuation-quickstart-v1.md)
3. [Open Atlas Auto Repair to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md)
4. [Open Tiny Semi-Auto Demo Pack v1](./tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md)
5. [Open Auto Repair Integrated Handoff v1](./auto-repair-integrated-handoff-v1.md)
If you want the broader product surface:
* [Back to Auto Repair v1 README](./README.md)
* [Back to Fixes Hub](../README.md)
* [Back to Atlas landing page](../../../wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md)
* [Back to Atlas Hub](../../README.md)
---
## 21. One-line summary 🌍
**Worked Escalation Example v1 shows how Atlas routing and local Auto Repair can create a real local gain, while WFGY 3.0 becomes the correct deeper continuation layer when that local gain is still not enough.**