From 380d321226a64df72aa355b928250c8e090c4507 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: PSBigBig + MiniPS Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 23:01:50 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update worked-escalation-example-v1.md --- .../worked-escalation-example-v1.md | 202 ++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 155 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) diff --git a/ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/auto-repair/worked-escalation-example-v1.md b/ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/auto-repair/worked-escalation-example-v1.md index 45005daf..5cc6578b 100644 --- a/ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/auto-repair/worked-escalation-example-v1.md +++ b/ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/auto-repair/worked-escalation-example-v1.md @@ -1,31 +1,108 @@ -# Worked Escalation Example v1 + + +# Worked Escalation Example v1 🧭 + +## A concrete case where local repair helps, but deeper continuation is still justified + +Quick links: + +- [Back to Auto Repair v1 README](./README.md) +- [Back to Fixes Hub](../README.md) +- [Back to Official Fixes](../official/README.md) +- [Back to Atlas landing page](../../../wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md) +- [Back to AI Eval Evidence](../../ai-eval-evidence.md) +- [Back to Atlas Hub](../../README.md) +- [Get the Atlas Router TXT](../../troubleshooting-atlas-router-v1.txt) +- [Open Atlas Auto Repair to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md) +- [Open WFGY 3.0 Deeper Continuation Quickstart v1](./wfgy-3-0-deeper-continuation-quickstart-v1.md) +- [Open Tiny Semi-Auto Demo Spec v1](./tiny-semi-auto-demo-spec-v1.md) +- [Open Tiny Semi-Auto Demo Pack v1](./tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md) +- [Open Repair Validation Loop v1](./repair-validation-loop-v1.md) +- [Open Rollback Policy v1](./rollback-policy-v1.md) +- [Open Safe Early Action Catalog v1](./safe-early-action-catalog-v1.md) +- [Open Worked Escalation Example F4 v1](./worked-escalation-example-f4-v1.md) + +--- + +If the bridge document explains **why WFGY 3.0 belongs after Atlas and Auto Repair**, this page shows **what that transition looks like in one concrete worked case**. Its purpose is very specific: -> show one case where Atlas routing and a local Auto Repair move are useful, -> but not sufficient, -> and where deeper continuation into WFGY 3.0 becomes justified. +> show one case where Atlas routing and a local Auto Repair move are useful, +> but not sufficient, +> and where deeper continuation into WFGY 3.0 becomes justified This document does **not** claim that every difficult case must escalate to WFGY 3.0. It claims something narrower and more useful: -> some cases can be improved locally first, -> but still require deeper encoding, experiment, or structural continuation. +> some cases can be improved locally first, +> but still require deeper encoding, experiment, or structural continuation. > This is where WFGY 3.0 becomes the correct next layer. -This document should be read together with: +--- -- `atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md` -- `tiny-semi-auto-demo-spec-v1.md` -- `tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md` -- `repair-validation-loop-v1.md` -- `rollback-policy-v1.md` -- `safe-early-action-catalog-v1.md` +## Quick start 🚀 + +### I want the shortest reading + +Use this path: + +1. read the case summary +2. inspect the Atlas routing +3. inspect the local planner output and selected action +4. inspect the validation result +5. inspect why the final local outcome becomes `escalate` + +### I want the stronger bridge reading + +Use this page together with: + +1. [Atlas Auto Repair to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md) +2. [WFGY 3.0 Deeper Continuation Quickstart v1](./wfgy-3-0-deeper-continuation-quickstart-v1.md) +3. [Worked Escalation Example F4 v1](./worked-escalation-example-f4-v1.md) + +Short version: + +> Atlas got the first layer right +> local repair created a real gain +> validation showed that gain was only partial +> the unresolved remainder now belongs to deeper continuation --- @@ -41,31 +118,45 @@ The Atlas stack already shows: But one crucial system question still remains: -> what does a real escalation look like +> what does a real escalation look like > when local repair helps, but does not actually close the case? This file exists to answer that. In short: -> this is the first concrete example of why WFGY 3.0 matters after Atlas and Auto Repair have already done useful work. +> this is the first concrete example of why WFGY 3.0 matters after Atlas and Auto Repair have already done useful work --- -## 2. Escalation principle +## 2. Worked escalation quick map 🗂️ + +| Layer | What happens in this example | +|---|---| +| Atlas | correctly routes the case into F7 first | +| Auto Repair | chooses a real local shell repair that genuinely helps | +| Validation | shows the gain is only partial, not fake success | +| Escalation decision | concludes the unresolved remainder is deeper than a local shell fix | +| WFGY 3.0 | becomes the correct next layer for deeper representational and encoding continuation | + +This page is the right place when the question is **what an honest escalation should look like**, not whether all difficult cases should automatically jump into WFGY 3.0. + +--- + +## 3. Escalation principle A worked escalation example should show all four of these: 1. Atlas routing was useful -2. Local repair was useful -3. Local repair was not enough +2. local repair was useful +3. local repair was not enough 4. WFGY 3.0 becomes justified for deeper continuation If any of those four pieces are missing, the example is incomplete. --- -## 3. Chosen example +## 4. Chosen example This first worked escalation example uses an F7-first case with neighboring F1 pressure. @@ -80,7 +171,7 @@ This makes the transition to WFGY 3.0 very clear. --- -## 4. Case summary +## 5. Case summary ### Case ID @@ -103,7 +194,7 @@ That is exactly the kind of case where escalation should be explicit. --- -## 5. Atlas routing layer +## 6. Atlas routing layer ### Routed diagnosis @@ -127,7 +218,7 @@ This is important, because escalation to WFGY 3.0 should happen **after correct --- -## 6. Auto Repair planner layer +## 7. Auto Repair planner layer ### Planner output @@ -164,7 +255,7 @@ This is exactly what Auto Repair is supposed to do. --- -## 7. Local action layer +## 8. Local action layer ### Selected action @@ -197,11 +288,11 @@ It means the local repair was **insufficient**. --- -## 8. Validation layer +## 9. Validation layer ### Validation result -```json id="jp7uw0" +```json id="njlwm7" { "validation_target": "schema validity", "before_state_summary": "output structure was unstable and could not be consumed reliably", @@ -234,11 +325,11 @@ This is the exact kind of situation where a deeper continuation layer becomes me --- -## 9. Why local repair is not enough +## 10. Why local repair is not enough This is the most important section in the whole example. -The local Atlas / Auto Repair action improved the shell. +The local Atlas and Auto Repair action improved the shell. But the case still shows signs that the problem is deeper than shell repair alone. @@ -260,7 +351,7 @@ That is the reason to escalate. --- -## 10. Escalation decision +## 11. Escalation decision ### Final local outcome @@ -276,13 +367,13 @@ Escalation is correct because: 4. the unresolved remainder points to deeper structural inadequacy 5. further progress now benefits from WFGY 3.0 rather than repeated shallow shell edits -This is not escalation because the case is “interesting.” +This is not escalation because the case is interesting. -It is escalation because the local repair layer has reached its limit. +It is escalation because the local repair layer has reached its honest limit. --- -## 11. WFGY 3.0 continuation rationale +## 12. WFGY 3.0 continuation rationale At this point, WFGY 3.0 becomes the correct continuation layer because the remaining problem is no longer only: @@ -311,23 +402,21 @@ That is classic WFGY territory. --- -## 12. Official WFGY 3.0 continuation asset +## 13. Official WFGY 3.0 continuation asset ### Official TXT -```text -https://raw.githubusercontent.com/onestardao/WFGY/refs/heads/main/TensionUniverse/WFGY-3.0_Singularity-Demo_AutoBoot_SHA256-Verifiable.txt -``` +* [WFGY 3.0 Singularity Demo TXT](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/onestardao/WFGY/refs/heads/main/TensionUniverse/WFGY-3.0_Singularity-Demo_AutoBoot_SHA256-Verifiable.txt) This TXT should be treated as the official deeper continuation pack. --- -## 13. Recommended escalation handoff prompt +## 14. Recommended escalation handoff prompt Use the following handoff pattern when escalating this case. -```text id="0z7k4i" +```text id="vpkfj6" The case below has already been routed through Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas. Atlas result: @@ -359,11 +448,11 @@ This keeps the transition disciplined. --- -## 14. Recommended system prompt for escalation mode +## 15. Recommended system prompt for escalation mode Use this if you want the AI to operate in a bridge-aware escalation mode. -```text id="brjlwm" +```text id="nk7w49" You are continuing a case that has already passed through Atlas diagnosis and one local Auto Repair attempt. Your job is not to redo Atlas from scratch. @@ -384,11 +473,11 @@ Rules: --- -## 15. Worked escalation object +## 16. Worked escalation object For compact reuse, the whole escalation can be summarized like this: -```json id="4h83xa" +```json id="4zkjlwm" { "example_id": "WEE_F7_001", "atlas_result": { @@ -414,7 +503,7 @@ For compact reuse, the whole escalation can be summarized like this: --- -## 16. Why this example matters +## 17. Why this example matters This worked escalation example matters because it proves five things at once. @@ -442,7 +531,7 @@ That last point is especially important. --- -## 17. What this example does not claim +## 18. What this example does not claim This example does **not** claim: @@ -460,7 +549,7 @@ That is the correct scope. --- -## 18. Recommended next step +## 19. Recommended next step Once this file exists, the next useful follow-up is probably one of these: @@ -476,6 +565,25 @@ because that would show the bridge is not only about F7-style representational c --- -## 19. One-line summary +## 20. Next steps ✨ + +After this page, most readers continue with: + +1. [Open Worked Escalation Example F4 v1](./worked-escalation-example-f4-v1.md) +2. [Open WFGY 3.0 Deeper Continuation Quickstart v1](./wfgy-3-0-deeper-continuation-quickstart-v1.md) +3. [Open Atlas Auto Repair to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-auto-repair-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md) +4. [Open Tiny Semi-Auto Demo Pack v1](./tiny-semi-auto-demo-pack-v1.md) +5. [Open Auto Repair Integrated Handoff v1](./auto-repair-integrated-handoff-v1.md) + +If you want the broader product surface: + +* [Back to Auto Repair v1 README](./README.md) +* [Back to Fixes Hub](../README.md) +* [Back to Atlas landing page](../../../wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md) +* [Back to Atlas Hub](../../README.md) + +--- + +## 21. One-line summary 🌍 **Worked Escalation Example v1 shows how Atlas routing and local Auto Repair can create a real local gain, while WFGY 3.0 becomes the correct deeper continuation layer when that local gain is still not enough.**