Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
This updates the nightly workflow to run hourly as opposed to once
daily.
Notably, it also
- changes the poll duration for the auto updater - we now poll 4 times
an hour on the Nightly channel and continue with the old rate for all
other channels
- moves the pre-checks to the linux runners, since we have more
resources available there
- only ever allow one concurrent nightly run
Release Notes:
- N/A
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/actions/runs/25881329418 complains
about the deprecation of Node.js version 20, which will soon be
force-bumped to 24 in the runner contexts.
Thus, this PR bumps all the jobs mentioned there to versions that run on
Node.js 24 by default. I checked all the release note section for the
three actions and this should not change any behaviour according to
their release notes and get us ready for the deprecation.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Since we download the grammars into the `./grammars` directory, the
formatting check can fail on unformatted query files that are present in
the grammars directory, as observed in
https://github.com/zed-extensions/log/pull/18
Thus, this PR changes the check to be more specific to just the queries
in the `languages` directory.
Release Notes:
- N/A
We shouldn't trigger this workflow on pull_request_review.submitted
because (1) two out of three possible cases here are already handled by
the build-in workflow automation of the project board itself, and (2)
this takes us into the territory of workflow runs that require approval.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Auto-syncs derived fields on a private GitHub Project (#84) from issue
labels and comment activity. Goal is to more effectively track issue
states and make sure we're triaging, closing the loop when
possible/relevant.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [ x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ n/a] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ n/a] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ n/a] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes #ISSUE
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
From now on, we will instead just make another patch version bump. That
has the advantage that tags will actually always only be applied to the
version bump and not some random change as well as us being able to
prohibit updates of tag refs for the Zed Zippy identity as well.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
No, sadly, the title is not a typo. See
https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/zsg1lk7w13cf for the context.
I'll read with joy and popcorn through that root cause analysis.
It makes literally zero sense what happened here, but for some completly
bonkers reason GitHub completely messed up the merge queue with
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/54632.
I have no idea how it happened. It makes literally zero sense. A PR
going into the merge queue should have the same LoC when getting out of
it. GitHub obviously does not check this. GitHub causes extra work with
a feature that is supposed to save time.
Thanks, I guess.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Danilo Leal <daniloleal09@gmail.com>
This PR brings back the button to filter remote branches when accessing
the title bar's branch picker with the mouse. It was unintentionally
removed when we introduced the new worktree picker.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
This helps with two things: Testing changes locally against real commits
as well as laying the groundwork for making things less convoluted for
the GitHub worker.
Also removes some useless wrapping left from an earlier direction.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This changes our approach for creating Zed version bumps with the Zed
Zippy identity:
With these changes, the Zippy version bumps as well as the tag creations
will be verified as per
https://docs.github.com/en/authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/about-commit-signature-verification#signature-verification-for-bots.
This adds an extra layer of security for version bumps and release
triggers done by the Zippy identity.
Eventually, we can move code more around for this so it happens in the
bot itself, but for now, I think its a good and solid interim solution
to have this here.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This adds a merge queue trigger to our main CI job to allow for a merge
queue which runs a subset of our tests before merging to main.
With this setup, merging to main would probably take around one to two
minutes and would not catch all but definitely most issues. We could
extend it here though as we'd like.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This will ensure we do not post a second Slack message in case the first
check was successful. We still _run_ the second check, but do not notify
Release Notes:
- N/A
Removed 'Text Threads' option from the mode dropdown for AI issues,
since #52757 removed the feature
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/53408 did not solve the root
issue of the cache issues we were seeing with building the visual tests
binary.
Thus, moving this to a separate step here to test how fast it is and
removing it from the other test runs - it should not be there anyway and
especially not for the tests on release builds.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This relies on 1.94s --workspace option we've added to cargo
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A
This will make rerunning failing jobs easier, as this here is just a
pager, not anything we need to rerun - there exists a second check that
is blocking and should be rerun, this job however does not need to be.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was missing from the previous permissions changes.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [X] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [X] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
This fixes three pre-existing issues in the visual test runner that were
never caught because visual tests aren't run in CI.
## Fixes
**1. Re-entrant read panic in sidebar creation (3 places)**
`Sidebar::new` reads the `MultiWorkspace` entity, so creating it inside
a `multi_workspace.update()` closure causes a `cannot read while being
updated` panic. Fixed by using `update_window` with
`root_view.downcast()` to get the handle without holding a mutable
borrow.
**2. Tooltip entity leak in breakpoint_hover test**
The tooltip system has an Rc cycle (`ActiveTooltip::Visible` holds a
`check_visible_and_update` closure that captures the
`Rc<RefCell<Option<ActiveTooltip>>>`). This cycle is normally broken
when the tooltip is dismissed, but the test closed the window while the
tooltip was still visible, causing a panic from the leak detector. Fixed
by simulating a click before cleanup to dismiss the tooltip.
**3. Visual tests not in CI**
Added a `cargo_run_visual_tests` step to the macOS test job via xtask so
these tests run on every PR and regressions are caught early.
Release Notes:
- N/A
