Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR updates the documentation to remove the no longer valid
`preferred_line_length` option value from `soft_wrap`.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Adds a note to the `search_web` tool entry in the AI tools docs
clarifying that the built-in tool is only available to Zed Pro
subscribers, and pointing free-plan users to MCP servers as an
alternative.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes #ISSUE
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Removes the Vercel v0 Provider, as the v0 API has been
depredated/removed (https://api.v0.dev/v1)
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- agent: Removed Vercel v0 provider as it has been deprecated by Vercel
These changes attempt to expand on the work introduced by
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/54778 by introducing a new
`GoToDefinitionScrollStrategy::Preserve` variant that attempts to keep
the cursor at the same vertical offset within the viewport when
navigating to a definition.
Most of the machinery for this was already in place. To support cases
where the user's scroll position isn't snapped to an exact display row,
for example, after scrolling with the mmouse, `Autoscroll::TopRelative`
and `Autoscroll::BottomRelative` were updated from `usize` to
`ScrollOffset`, allowing fractional offsets.
When the cursor is offscreen at the moment the `editor: go to
definition` action is invoked, `Preserve` falls back to
`Autoscroll::center`, matching the existing default for
`go_to_definition_scroll_strategy`. This avoids attempting to preserve
an offset where the cursor isn't visible which would lead to the cursor
being offscreen when jumping to the definition.
Documentation has also been updated to reflect this new strategy value.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Relates to #52173
Release Notes:
- Added a new `preserve` option to `go_to_definition_scroll_strategy`
that keeps the cursor at the same vertical position within the viewport
when navigating to a definition
- Document Git worktrees as a general Git workflow in the Git docs
- Add cross-links from AI, tasks, worktree trust, and remote development
docs
- Include the `git::Worktree` action in the Git action reference
The main docs gap was that worktrees were mostly framed as an AI
isolation feature, while Zed implements them as a general Git workflow
through the title bar worktree picker.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Danilo Leal <daniloleal09@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Danilo Leal <67129314+danilo-leal@users.noreply.github.com>
Leftovers after https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/53651
Updated models:
- **Zen**: GPT 5.5 and GPT 5.5 Pro - not tested because I don't have a
Zen subscription and I stubbornly refuse to get one
- **Go**: DeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Flash - failing due to
https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/24224
- **Go**: MiMo V2.5 and MiMo V2.5 Pro - tested, confirmed working
- **Free**: Ling 2.6 Flash, [available for "a limited
time"](https://x.com/opencode/status/2046717718028513694) - tested,
confirmed working
- **Free**: Hy3 Preview, [available until May
8](https://x.com/opencode/status/2047328981435756824) - tested,
confirmed working
When testing the new models and comparing with OpenCode CLI, I realized
the
[variants](https://opencode.ai/docs/models/#built-in-variants)/thinking
effort configuration was not supported by the Zed Agent implementation.
I added that for OpenCode Go models, after manually checking what each
model supports in OpenCode. Reasoning levels and everything seems to
work (UI looks good, model works) but I have no idea how to specifically
test reasoning levels without doing a full benchmark 🤷
I did not add the same thing for OpenCode Zen models because I could not
figure out a way to get the supported variants.
@benbrandt let me know if you want me to take this out of this PR and to
keep just the model updates!
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- OpenCode: add new models (GPT 5.5, DeepSeek V4, MiMo V2.5, Ling 2.6,
Hy3)
- OpenCode Go: add support for configurable reasoning effort levels
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Brandt <benjamin.j.brandt@gmail.com>
I might turn this into a big PR with multiple fixes. So no, this is not
going stale. I’m updating this as and when I find broken refs or stale
content.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <git@maxdeviant.com>
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- Fixed accidental duplication of words in themes.md
## Summary
- Add a new "Configuration Boundaries" section to the external agents
documentation explaining what settings are shared between Zed and ACP
agents
- Clarify bidirectional configuration story: what Zed forwards to agents
AND what agents inherit from native installations
- Add troubleshooting section for common user confusion points
- Update MCP docs with clearer cross-links
## Context
Users are confused about which Zed settings apply to external ACP agents
like Claude and Codex. Common questions:
- "I configured MCP in Zed but Claude can't see it"
- "My Codex config.toml isn't being used"
- "Do profiles apply to external agents?"
## Key Points
**What Zed forwards to ACP agents:**
- Model/mode selection, env vars, MCP servers (with limitations),
CLAUDE.md
**What's NOT forwarded:**
- Profiles, tool permissions settings, `.rules` files
**What agents DON'T inherit from native installations:**
- `~/.claude/` config, `~/.codex/config.toml`, native MCP servers,
authentication state
## Test plan
- [x] Review for technical accuracy against codebase
- [x] Check brand voice compliance
Release Notes:
- N/A
**TL;DR**: add support for OpenCode Go (flat-rate monthly subscription)
along the already-implemented OpenCode Zed (pay-as-you-go billing).
> [!WARNING]
> This code was written by LLMs, under the supervision of a so-called
developer that never wrote Rust profesionally and that spends more time
in Pages&Keynote than in an IDE.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
## Background
OpenCode offers a few different ways to access models:
- **free access to 3 models**, with feedback and data used to improve
the model. These models use the OpenCode Zen API endpoints, but have
different usage limits (200 requests per 5 hours) and have a different
privacy policy. Some people disable or block the free models, some
people are super-excited to have access to LLMs for free, and some
people like using the free models to test new LLMs (at launch MiMo-V2
had 2 free weeks of usage, for example).
- **pay-as-you-go access to 30 models** as part of the [OpenCode
Zen](https://opencode.ai/zen) subscription. These models use the same
OpenCode Zen API endpoints.
- **flat-rate monthly access to 7 models** as part of the [OpenCode
Go](https://opencode.ai/go) subscription. These models use the OpenCode
Zen API endpoints with an extra `/go` appended to the path. There are
5-hour, weekly, and monthly usage limits and, additionally, users can
toggle a switch in the OpenCode Console to use Zen models with their
pay-as-you-go billing after the Go limits are hit.
There's also a currently-paused [OpenCode
Black](https://opencode.ai/black) flat-rate subscription with way higher
usage limits and with access to more models, with $100 and $200 monthly
plans.
The whole thing is a bit messy, but it's great value and highly reliable
LLM access!
<br>
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/49589 added support for
OpenCode Zen by implementing a new `opencode` provider. OpenCode Go
[could be used by overriding the API
URL](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/49589#issuecomment-4130300454),
but that is a terrible user experience: some models have to be manually
added, the model list always shows the 30-something OpenCode Zen models,
and free models cannot be used at all.
I was annoyed by the experience of using OpenCode Go with Zed and this
past week I had to test a bunch of LLMs and providers and harnesses, so
I took this on as a test case 🙂
## Implementation
This PR makes the OpenCode provider more general (not just for Zen) and
adds an `OpenCodeModelSubscription` concept which is then used to
implement support for OpenCode Go. The free models are also broken out
into their own subscription for a prettier model list.
For a better user experience, the different subscriptions can be enabled
or disabled, both in the settings file and in the UX:
<img width="434" height="176" alt="Screenshot showing the OpenCode
provider configuration, with the newly added toggles"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3520e114-00c8-4794-84bf-35cd72d9c57e"
/>
The code was written by LLMs, but I do understand it and I did a bunch
of "manual" iterations and "manual" tweaks. Still, my Rust experience is
non-existent so **I won't feel offended if y'all reject this PR**! I did
consider alternatives (adding a new `opencode-go` provider and renaming
this to `opencode-zen`, for example, or adding support for custom API
URLs in OpenCode custom models which would've been the smallest code
change but a terrible user experience, and so on) but all alternatives
would have been, in my opinion, a worse user experience.
**Tests I did**:
- confirmed OpenCode Go models work as expected
- confirmed OpenCode Zen Free models work as expected
- confirmed I get an error when trying to use OpenCode Zen models since
I don't have that subscription
- confirmed the subcription toggles work as expected (model are
shown/hidden, settings file is updated)
**Notes**:
- this PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit. I did not create a separate
PR for the model updates to minimize delays
- my exeprience with Rust is roughly zero, but I tried to strike a
balance between idiomatic Rust and easy-to-read code
- users of the OpenCode provider might have to do some re-configuration
after this PR is merged since the model identifiers now include the
subscription, eg `claude-haiku-4-5` is now `zen/claude-haiku-4-5`. Since
this is a relatively new provider and the impact is small, I preffered
that rather than adding complex migration/mapping logic.
- does changing the provider name from "OpenCode Zen" to "OpenCode"
break anything for y'all at Zed?
- does changing the telemetry id from `"opencode/<model-id>"` to
`"opencode/<subscription>/<model-id>"` break anything for y'all at Zed?
---
Release Notes:
- OpenCode provider: add support for OpenCode Go
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Brandt <benjamin.j.brandt@gmail.com>
Allows to reconfigure behavior, including the previous one, `top`
Closes https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/52173
Release Notes:
- Reworked go to definition to open its target in the center of the
editor. Can be reconfigured with `go_to_definition_scroll_strategy`.
No, sadly, the title is not a typo. See
https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/zsg1lk7w13cf for the context.
I'll read with joy and popcorn through that root cause analysis.
It makes literally zero sense what happened here, but for some completly
bonkers reason GitHub completely messed up the merge queue with
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/54632.
I have no idea how it happened. It makes literally zero sense. A PR
going into the merge queue should have the same LoC when getting out of
it. GitHub obviously does not check this. GitHub causes extra work with
a feature that is supposed to save time.
Thanks, I guess.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Danilo Leal <daniloleal09@gmail.com>
Needs https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/54635 for the profile
overrides added into default settings json to work.
Part of https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/48968
Another part of the fix related seems to be
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/45669 ?
Using the steps from the issue and profiling on macOs had shown that Zed
has 2 memory "leaks" in play when a certain file is being rewritten a
lot of times.
* First, the thread profiler registers a lot of tasks' data and fills
its buffer to the limit:
<img width="3456" height="2158" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f183312d-4389-4072-8915-d54e60419b08"
/>
* Second, if the buffer gets open, the undo history fragments start to
creep up infinitely:
<img width="3456" height="2158" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/61a2b66b-81fd-4973-9c3c-c339f886d9b2"
/>
The PR aims to solve the first issue by disabling the profiling by
default, yet leaving the way to turn in on quickly with settings.
The memory usage profiling shows that the memory usage is now
dynamically affected by the new setting:
<img width="2032" height="1136" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8a6c76b9-6fb7-44bc-ac1d-3c34afe7c575"
/>
While the test directory being thrashed with the script from the issue,
* first, Zed starts with the profiling disabled
* then gets the profiling enabled which results in the memory growth
close to 1 minute mark of the screenshot
* last, the profiling gets disabled again, releasing all the memory
accumulated
Release Notes:
- Improved Zed's default memory usage
This PR brings back the button to filter remote branches when accessing
the title bar's branch picker with the mouse. It was unintentionally
removed when we introduced the new worktree picker.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Adds a note to the Parallel Agents docs clarifying that thread import is
subject to agent support, and that some agents like Cursor and Gemini
CLI are not currently supported.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [X] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Closes#49581
Adds a `line_ending` language setting that controls how line endings are
handled for new files and during format/save:
- `detect` (default) — detects existing line endings; new files use the
platform default
- `prefer_lf` / `prefer_crlf` — sets LF or CRLF for new files and files
with no existing convention, while preserving existing files
- `enforce_lf` / `enforce_crlf` — normalizes all line endings to LF or
CRLF on every format/save
The setting can be configured globally, per-language, or via
`.editorconfig`'s `end_of_line` property (which maps to `enforce_lf` /
`enforce_crlf`).
Release Notes:
- Added `line_ending` setting to control how line endings are handled
for new files and normalized on save.
- Added support for `.editorconfig` `end_of_line` property to enforce
line endings.
---------
Co-authored-by: Smit Barmase <heysmitbarmase@gmail.com>
Adds documentation for the Parallel Agents feature.
## Changes
- **New page** `docs/src/ai/parallel-agents.md`: covers the Threads
Sidebar component, switching threads, the archive and search, importing
ACP threads, running multiple threads, multiple projects, worktree
isolation, and the default layout change
- **`docs/src/ai/overview.md`**: rewrites the Agentic editing section to
lead with the Threads Sidebar, adds Parallel Agents to the Getting
started links
- **`docs/src/ai/agent-panel.md`**: adds a cross-link to the Threads
Sidebar in Creating New Threads, removes the Navigating History section
(now covered in the Threads Sidebar docs)
- **`docs/src/SUMMARY.md`**: adds Parallel Agents between External
Agents and Inline Assistant
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Katie Geer <katie@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Max Brunsfeld <maxbrunsfeld@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Danilo Leal <67129314+danilo-leal@users.noreply.github.com>
The "Command menonics" section in Zed's vim mode documentation made it
seem that the mentioned aliases were available, by default, which isn't
the case. These changes update the documentation to make it clearer that
this is meant to be set on the `command_aliases` setting and provides
and example configuration that users can easily copy and paste into
their settings file.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes#52894
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: dino <dinojoaocosta@gmail.com>
Release Notes:
- Added interleaved_reasoning option to openai compatible models
---
This PR adds the interleaved_reasoning option for OpenAI-compatible
models, addressing the issue described in
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/issues/20837.
In my testing, enabling interleaved_reasoning not only resolved the
tool-calling issues encountered by Qwen3.5 models in llama.cpp, but also
appeared to improve the model's coding capabilities. I have also
verified the outgoing requests using a proxy to ensure the parameter is
being sent correctly.It is also likely that this change will benefit
other models and providers as well.
Note: While I used AI to assist with the implementation, I have reviewed
and tested the changes. As I am relatively new to Rust and the Zed
codebase, I would appreciate any feedback or suggestions for
improvement. I am happy to make further adjustments if needed.
Thank you all for building such an amazing editor!
Co-authored-by: Oleksiy Syvokon <oleksiy@zed.dev>
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR makes Zed only have one worktree picker, as opposed to a flavor
of it in the title bar and another in the agent panel. It then moves it
to the title bar, making it always present, so that its trigger is
separate from the branch picker (which now contains only two views:
branches and stashes). For the worktree picker, I'm mostly favoring the
behavior we've introduced in the agent-panel-flavored version.
It also updates the title bar settings migration to use the JSON
`migrate_settings` helper instead of a shallow Tree-sitter rewrite, so
old `show_branch_icon = true` values are promoted to
`show_branch_status_icon = true` across root, platform, release-channel,
and profile settings scopes.
- [x] Move worktree creation logic to the `git_ui` crate to make this
more generic and less agent-specific
- [x] Double-check the remote use case and ensure nothing broke there
- [x] Improve the UX for the detached HEAD state; better invite people
to create a branch
- [x] Migrate `show_branch_icon = true` to `show_branch_status_icon =
true` across nested settings scopes
Suggested .rules additions
When migrating renamed settings keys that can appear in platform
overrides, release-channel overrides, or profiles, prefer the JSON
`migrations::migrate_settings` helper over shallow Tree-sitter key
rewrites unless tests explicitly cover every nested scope that can
contain the key.
Release Notes:
- Improved migration of the title bar branch status icon setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: Nathan Sobo <nathan@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Zed Zippy <234243425+zed-zippy[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Brandt <benjamin.j.brandt@gmail.com>
Remove statements that imply that `subtle` edit prediction mode can only
be used if Zed is set as an edit provider, despite this not being the
case.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes#53207
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: morgankrey <morgan@zed.dev>
We had an internal report of soft wrap not working in git panel's commit
editor. Given the following settings:
```json
{
"languages": {
"Git Commit": {
"preferred_line_length": 80,
"soft_wrap": "preferred_line_length",
},
},
}
```
We would not soft-wrap in narrow viewports. As it turned out, the
problem was that we were always prefering a `preferred_line_length` as
our soft wrap boundary over the actual width of the editor.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- Fixed git commits editor not respecting soft wrap boundaries.
- settings: Removed `"soft_wrap": "preferred_line_length"` in favour of
`"soft_wrap": "bounded"`. Soft wrap now always respects editor width
when it's enabled.
## Summary
- Add Claude Opus 4.7 to the pricing table with same rates as Opus 4.6
- Add Claude Opus 4.7 to context windows table (1M context)
- Update model retirements to include Opus 4.7 as upgrade path from Opus
4.1
- Add Opus 4.7 to Bedrock extended context section
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Finn Evers <finn.evers@outlook.de>
## What Changed
- compute range-format support from formatter configuration and
language-server capabilities
- show `Format Selections` only when at least one selected buffer has a
range-capable formatter
- keep Prettier-supported range formatting available without depending
on LSP support
- hide the action for formatter modes that cannot honor selections, such
as external-command and code-action formatters
- keep the action handler safe by rechecking support and returning early
when range formatting is unavailable
- restrict capability checks to the servers actually registered for the
current buffer
- add regression coverage for supported, unsupported, and mixed-server
cases
- document when `Format Selections` is available in both action docs and
user docs
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes#25796
Release Notes:
- Improved `Format Selections` so it is only shown when the active
formatter supports range formatting.
Testing I did:
Here are the formatters I used:
<img width="829" height="434" alt="Screenshot_20260405_102047"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cae4a238-277e-4188-873f-189e9f098699"
/>
Note: I've chosen three formatters:
1. Prettier, which supports range formatting
2. clangd (LSP) which also supports range formatting
3. gopls which do not support range formatting
[Screencast_20260405_102431.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/69ce3f95-0b73-46a0-853d-3b5be6329dde)
---------
Signed-off-by: Pratik Karki <pratik@prertik.com>
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <kirill@zed.dev>
### Docs update.
- adding 'what is Dexter' one-liner
- adding config examples
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [~] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [~] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [~] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [~] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
✅ Elixir LS update -
[PR](https://github.com/zed-extensions/elixir/pull/115) merged
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: AltCode <altcode@vivaldi.net>
This fixes#53740.
A few MCP docs links were still pointing at old extension slugs, so they
led to dead pages. This updates those links to the current canonical
slugs.
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Kunall Banerjee <hey@kimchiii.space>
## Summary
The docs preprocessor was configured with `renderer = ["html"]`, but the
actual output renderer is `zed-html`. This mismatch caused mdbook to
skip the preprocessing step, leaving YAML frontmatter unprocessed in the
rendered HTML.
**Symptoms:**
- YAML frontmatter (`---\ntitle: ...\n---`) leaked into rendered HTML
- `---` rendered as `<hr />`
- Frontmatter fields appeared as `<h2>` headings (setext heading
interpretation)
- Meta description tags showed default values instead of page-specific
descriptions
## Root Cause
The `renderer = ["html"]` config was introduced in August 2024 (#16883)
when the preprocessor was first added. At that time, the output was the
standard `html` renderer.
In July 2025 (#35112), the `[output.zed-html]` custom renderer was added
for frontmatter/postprocessing support, but the preprocessor's
`renderer` filter wasn't updated to match.
**Why it broke now (April 12, 2026):**
The mismatch was latent - it worked inconsistently depending on CI
environment conditions. Comparing two deploys from the same day:
| Deploy | Network Errors | Preprocessing |
|--------|---------------|---------------|
| 19:00 UTC | 0 | ✓ Runs correctly |
| 21:54 UTC | Many (`static.crates.io` connection failures) | ✗ Skipped
|
The 21:54 deploy had network errors during `cargo run -p
docs_preprocessor`. mdbook appears to have silently skipped the
preprocessor and proceeded directly to the renderer. The postprocessor
still ran (via the renderer's separate cargo command), but without
preprocessing, frontmatter wasn't converted to metadata.
**The fix:** Change `renderer = ["html"]` to `renderer = ["html",
"zed-html"]` to support both the custom renderer and any fallback to the
standard html renderer (e.g., during local development or if mdbook
commands internally use html).
## Test plan
- [x] Local build produces correct HTML without frontmatter leaking
- [x] Meta descriptions correctly populated from frontmatter
- [x] CI `check_docs` shows all 3 preprocessor steps running:
- `docs_preprocessor supports zed-html`
- `docs_preprocessor` (preprocessing)
- `docs_preprocessor postprocess`
Release Notes:
- N/A
follow up #47471
As described in #47471, we introduced a direction-aware strategy to
improve user experience when interacting with hover popovers. In this
follow-up, we are adding `hover_popover_sticky` and
`hover_popover_hiding_delay` to control whether the feature introduced
in 47471 enabled, and to let users configure the delay to balance
responsiveness . Also `hover_popover_sticky` can now be imported from
`editor.hover.sticky`, as well as `hover_popover_hiding_delay` from
`editor.hover.hidingDelay` in VSCode.
Also this PR adds several tests:
- `test_hover_popover_cancel_hide_on_rehover`: when the cursor returns
to the hover after leaving once within the hiding delay, the hover
should persist while canceling the existing hiding timer.
- `test_hover_popover_enabled_false_ignores_sticky` : when
`hover_popover_enabled` is false, the `hover_popover_sticky` and
`hover_popover_hiding_delay` have no effect(since no hover is shown).
- `test_hover_popover_sticky_delay_restarts_when_mouse_gets_closer`:
when mouse gets closer to hover popover, we expect the timer to reset
and the hover remains visible.
- `test_hover_popover_hiding_delay`: check if the delay(in test, that's
500ms) works.
- `test_hover_popover_sticky_disabled`: when hover_popover_sticky is
false, the hover popover disappears immediately after the cursor leaving
the codes.
- VSCode import test in `settings_store.rs`
Release Notes:
- Added `hover_popover_sticky` and `hover_popover_hiding_delay` settings
to balance responsiveness of hover popovers.
---------
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Self-Review Checklist:
- [ ] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [ ] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
_(Feature Requests #24962)_
_"Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you
have:"_
* [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
* [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
* [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- Added a `sort_order` to `project_panel` settings which dictates how
files and directories are sorted relative to each other in a
`sort_mode`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Smit Barmase <heysmitbarmase@gmail.com>
After chat functionality was removed, this panel became redundant. It
only displayed three notification types: incoming contact requests,
accepted contact requests, and channel invitations.
This PR moves those notifications into the collab experience by adding
toast popups and a badge count to the collab panel. It also removes the
notification-panel-specific settings, documentation, and Vim command.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- Removed the notification panel from Zed
