- Introduce `project_panel::Redo` action
- Update all platform keymaps in order to map
`redo`/`ctrl-shift-z`/`cmd-shift-z` to the `project_panel::Redo` action
### Restore Entry Support
- Update both `Project::delete_entry` and `Worktree::delete_entry` to
return the resulting `fs::TrashedEntry`
- Introduce both `Project::restore_entry` and `Worktree::restore_entry`
to allow restoring an entry in a worktree, given the `fs::TrashedEntry`
- Worth pointing out that support for restoring is not yet implemented
for remote worktrees, as that will be dealt with in a separate pull
request
### Undo Manager
- Split `ProjectPanelOperation` into two different enums, `Change` and
`Operation`
- While thinking through this, we noticed that simply recording the
operation that user was performing was not enough, specifically in the
case where undoing would restore the file, as in that specific case, we
needed the `trash::TrashedEntry` in order to be able to restore, so we
actually needed the result of executing the operation.
- Having that in mind, we decided to separate the operation (intent)
from the change (result), and record the change instead. With the change
being recorded, we can easily building the operation that needs to be
executed in order to invert that change.
- For example, if an user creates a new file, we record the
`ProjectPath` where the file was created, so that undoing can be a
matter of trashing that file. When undoing, we keep track of the
`trash::TrashedEntry` resulting from trashing the originally created
file, such that, redoing is a matter of restoring the
`trash::TrashedEntry`.
- Refer to the documentation in the `project_panel::undo` module for a
better breakdown on how this is implemented/handled.
- Introduce a task queue for dealing with recording changes, as well as
undo and redo requests in a sequential manner
- This meant moving some of the details in `UndoManager` to a
`project_panel::undo::Inner` implementation, and `UndoManager` now
serves as a simple wrapper/client around the inner implementation,
simply communicating with it to record changes and handle undo/redo
requests
- Callers that depend on the `UndoManager` now simply record which
changes they wish to track, which are then sent to the undo manager's
inner implementation
- Same for the undo and redo requests, those are simply sent to the undo
manager's inner implementation, which then deals with picking the
correct change from the history and executing its inverse operation
- Introduce support for tracking restore changes and operations
- `project_panel::undo::Change::Restored` – Keeps track that the
file/directory associated with the `ProjectPath` was a result of
restoring a trashed entry, for which we now that reverting is simply a
matter of trashing the path again
- `project_panel::undo::Operation::Restore` – Keeps track of both the
worktree id and the `TrashedEntry`, from which we can build the original
`ProjectPath` where the trashed entry needs to be restored
- Move project panel's undo tests to a separate module
`project_panel::tests::undo` to avoid growing the
`project::project_panel_tests` module into a monolithic test module
- Some of the functions in `project::project_panel_tests` were made
`pub(crate)` in order for us to be able to call those from
`project_panel::tests::undo`
### FS Changes
- Refactored the `Fs::trash_file` and `Fs::trash_dir` methods into a
single `Fs::trash` method
- This can now be done because `RealFs::trash_dir` and
`RealFs::trash_file` were simply calling `trash::delete_with_info`, so
we can simplify the trait
- Tests have also been simplified to reflect this new change, so we no
longer need a separate test for trashing a file and trashing a directory
- Update `Fs::trash` and `Fs::restore` to be async
- On the `RealFs` implementation we're now spawning a thread to perform
the trash/restore operation
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Relates to #5039
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Yara <git@yara.blue>
Co-authored-by: Miguel Raz Guzmán Macedo <miguel@zed.dev>
Co-authored-by: Marshall Bowers <git@maxdeviant.com>
Update both `Fs::trash_dir` and `Fs::trash_file` to now return the
location of the trashed directory or file, as well as adding the
`trash-rs` create dependency and updating the `RealFs` implementation
for these methods to simply leverage `trash::delete_with_info`.
* Add `fs::Fs::TrashedEntry` struct, which allows us to track the
original file path and the new path in the OS' trash
* Update the `fs::Fs::trash_dir` and `fs::Fs::trash_file` signatures to
now return `Result<TrashedEntry>` instead of `Result<()>`
* The `options` argument was removed because it was never used by
implementations other than the default one, and with this change to
the signature type, we no longer have a default implementation, so the
`options` argument would no longer make sense
* Update `fs::RealFs::trash_dir` and `fs::RealFs::trash_file`
implementations to simply delegate to `trash-rs` and convert the
result to a `TrashedEntry`
* Add `fs::FakeFs::trash` so we can simulate the OS' trash during tests
that touch the filesystem
* Add `fs::FakeFs::trash_file` implementation to leverage
`fs::FakeFs::trash`
* Add `fs::FakeFs::trash_dir` implementation to leverage
`fs::FakeFs::trash`
This PR allows users to create a new thread based off a git worktree
that already exists or has a custom name. User's can also choose what
branch they want the newly generated worktree to be based off of.
The UI still needs some polish, but I'm merging this early to get the
team using this before our preview launch. I'll be active today and
tomorrow before launch to fix any nits we have with the UI.
Functionality of this feature works! And I have a basic test to prevent
regressions
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: cameron <cameron.studdstreet@gmail.com>
Extend the git API with several new capabilities needed for worktree
archival and restoration:
- Add `allow_empty` flag to `CommitOptions` for creating WIP marker
commits
- Change `create_worktree` to accept `Option<String>` branch, enabling
detached worktree creation when `None` is passed
- Add `head_sha()` to read the current HEAD commit hash
- Add `update_ref()` and `delete_ref()` for managing git references
- Add `stage_all_including_untracked()` to stage everything before a WIP
commit
- Implement all new operations in `FakeGitRepository` with functional
commit history tracking, reset support, and ref management
- Update existing call sites for the new `CommitOptions` field and
`create_worktree` signature
Part 1 of 3 in the persist-worktree stack. These are nonbreaking API
additions with no behavioral changes to existing code.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Anthony Eid <anthony@zed.dev>
Closes#47907
Implements the four git checkpoint operations (`create`, `restore`,
`compare`, `diff`) that had been stubbed out for remote repositories,
and related test infrastructure.
Testing steps:
1. Open a project with a `.devcontainer` configuration and connect to
the Dev Container
2. Open an Agent thread and ask the agent to make a code change
3. After the agent completes, verify the "Restore from checkpoint"
button appears (previously missing in Dev Container sessions)
4. Click "Restore from checkpoint" and confirm the file reverts to its
prior state
Release Notes:
- Added support for git checkpoint operations in remote/Dev Container
sessions, restoring the "Restore from checkpoint" button in Agent
threads.
---------
Co-authored-by: KyleBarton <kjb@initialcapacity.io>
When a git worktree is in a detached HEAD state (e.g. after `git
checkout --detach`), the workspace for that worktree would disappear
from the sidebar UI, and if the workspace was currently open your UI
would just disappear.
This happened because `parse_worktrees_from_str` silently dropped any
worktree entries without a `branch` line in the porcelain output, which
cascaded through the `linked_worktrees` list and caused
`prune_stale_worktree_workspaces` to remove the workspace.
This PR:
- Makes `Worktree::ref_name` an `Option<SharedString>` so detached
worktrees can be represented
- Renames `Worktree::branch()` to `Worktree::display_name()`, which
returns the branch name when available or the short SHA as a fallback
(mirroring how the title bar already handles detached HEAD for
repositories)
- Updates `parse_worktrees_from_str` to include detached and bare
worktree entries instead of dropping them
- Filters detached worktrees out of the worktree picker UI, preserving
the existing product decision to only show branch-based worktrees there
## Self-Review Checklist
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
* [x] Display original project name as root folder in project panel,
titlebar
* [x] When manually creating worktrees, ensure final path component is
original project name
* [x] Display original project name, worktree name, and branch name in
titlebar
* [x] Only show main checkout in project switcher
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard Feldman <oss@rtfeldman.com>
Closes #ISSUE
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [ ] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [ ] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
- [ ] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
Release Notes:
- N/A *or* Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Closes#46661
This PR changes `fs.rename` to use the platform’s atomic no-overwrite
rename on all platforms when `overwrite` is `false`. This fixes a case
where concurrent renames to the same target could race past a separate
metadata check and end up overwriting each other.
In Project Panel, we can still rename entries in parallel without
worrying about OS internals not handling it correctly or making these
renames sequential.
Release Notes:
- Fixed an issue in the Project Panel where conflicting file moves could
overwrite each other instead of leaving the losing file in place.
The main issue is that we weren't forwarding the proto messages through
the collab server to the host. After fixing that I added integration
tests to cover local worktrees, remote worktrees, and ssh worktrees.
I also fixed a bug with FakeRepository where it wouldn't name its
current branch as a worktree when calling git worktree, which doesn't
match the behavior of the git binary.
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have:
- [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual
testing
- [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance
aspects
Release Notes:
- git: Fix bug that caused the git worktree picker from displaying and
creating worktrees over collab
