mirror of
https://github.com/zed-industries/zed.git
synced 2026-05-23 21:05:08 +00:00
9 commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Vlad Ionescu
|
7dcd422a73
|
opencode: Model updates (#57076)
**TL;DR**: clearer docs + models cleanup. ---- **Docs**: - as per the discussion in https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/56869, added a note to the docs highlighting that temporary models should be configured using Custom Models. Adding a whole example felt redundant considering the full example is literally 2 rows below. **Model updates**: - **Ring 2.6 1T Free**: removed - **GLM 5 and GLM 5.1**: different settings based on subscription — [131k]( |
||
|
Vlad Ionescu
|
8bdd78e023
|
opencode: Update Free models (#56328)
Some checks are pending
Congratsbot / check-author (push) Waiting to run
Congratsbot / congrats (push) Blocked by required conditions
deploy_nightly_docs / deploy_docs (push) Waiting to run
run_tests / orchestrate (push) Waiting to run
run_tests / check_style (push) Waiting to run
run_tests / clippy_windows (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / clippy_linux (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / clippy_mac (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / run_tests_windows (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / run_tests_linux (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / clippy_mac_x86_64 (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / run_tests_mac (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / doctests (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_workspace_binaries (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / build_visual_tests_binary (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_wasm (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_dependencies (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_docs (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_licenses (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_postgres_and_protobuf_migrations (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / extension_tests (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / tests_pass (push) Blocked by required conditions
Of course, right after yesterday's PR which was merged super-fast we get even more model updates from OpenCode: - **Big Pickle**: now supports interleaved reasoning as per |
||
|
Vlad Ionescu
|
c70e4a2f33
|
opencode: Remove deprecated models (#56278)
Removing deprecated models: - MiMo V2 and MiMo V2 Omni as per |
||
Matías Zapata Contreras
|
1e018436d8
|
opencode: Remove Ling 2.6 Flash Free model (#55984)
Some checks are pending
Congratsbot / check-author (push) Waiting to run
Congratsbot / congrats (push) Blocked by required conditions
deploy_nightly_docs / deploy_docs (push) Waiting to run
run_tests / orchestrate (push) Waiting to run
run_tests / check_style (push) Waiting to run
run_tests / clippy_windows (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / clippy_linux (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / clippy_mac (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / clippy_mac_x86_64 (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / run_tests_windows (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / run_tests_linux (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / run_tests_mac (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / doctests (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_workspace_binaries (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / build_visual_tests_binary (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_wasm (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_dependencies (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_docs (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_licenses (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_scripts (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / check_postgres_and_protobuf_migrations (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / extension_tests (push) Blocked by required conditions
run_tests / tests_pass (push) Blocked by required conditions
Remove the "Ling 2.6 Flash Free" model from the OpenCode provider's
built-in
model list, as it is no longer available via the API. Attempting to use
it
returns the following error:
```
invalid request format to OpenCode's API: {"error":{"message":"Error from provider: Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash","code":404},"user_id":"user_2..."}
```
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- Removed Ling 2.6 Flash Free model from the OpenCode provider
|
||
|
Vlad Ionescu
|
a42374250f
|
opencode: Support interleaved_reasoning and fix DeepSeek (#55574)
OpenCode API endpoints for DeepSeek were [moved from Anthropic-compatible to OpenAI-compatible](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/24500) and DeepSeek requires interleaved reasoning enabled to work. I ran a _"rename this variable to potato"_ test and I can confirm DeepSeek V4 Flash and Pro both work now 🎉 Some other OpenCode Go models were marked [on models.dev](https://github.com/anomalyco/models.dev/tree/dev/providers/opencode-go/models) as supporting `interleaved_reasoning` so they too got that enabled. Kimi K2.5 and Kimi K2.6 continue to fail with https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/51743 (https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/55085 seems to hint at this being [an OpenCode issue](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/issues/51743#issuecomment-4336785765)?), but all other models seem to work fine both with `interleaved_reasoning` and without it 🤷 I assume it's better to have that turned on? Again, the intersection of OpenAI Chat Completions API, different models, different inference providers, how they all work together is something I know nothing about! Self-Review Checklist: - [X] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [X] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [X] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) - [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [X] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - OpenCode Go: use correct DeepSeek endpoints - OpenCode: add support for interleaved_reasoning |
||
|
Vlad Ionescu
|
5eec0cecc1
|
opencode: Model updates + thinking levels (#54880)
Leftovers after https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/53651 Updated models: - **Zen**: GPT 5.5 and GPT 5.5 Pro - not tested because I don't have a Zen subscription and I stubbornly refuse to get one - **Go**: DeepSeek V4 Pro and DeepSeek V4 Flash - failing due to https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/24224 - **Go**: MiMo V2.5 and MiMo V2.5 Pro - tested, confirmed working - **Free**: Ling 2.6 Flash, [available for "a limited time"](https://x.com/opencode/status/2046717718028513694) - tested, confirmed working - **Free**: Hy3 Preview, [available until May 8](https://x.com/opencode/status/2047328981435756824) - tested, confirmed working When testing the new models and comparing with OpenCode CLI, I realized the [variants](https://opencode.ai/docs/models/#built-in-variants)/thinking effort configuration was not supported by the Zed Agent implementation. I added that for OpenCode Go models, after manually checking what each model supports in OpenCode. Reasoning levels and everything seems to work (UI looks good, model works) but I have no idea how to specifically test reasoning levels without doing a full benchmark 🤷 I did not add the same thing for OpenCode Zen models because I could not figure out a way to get the supported variants. @benbrandt let me know if you want me to take this out of this PR and to keep just the model updates! Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) - [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable Release Notes: - OpenCode: add new models (GPT 5.5, DeepSeek V4, MiMo V2.5, Ling 2.6, Hy3) - OpenCode Go: add support for configurable reasoning effort levels --------- Co-authored-by: Ben Brandt <benjamin.j.brandt@gmail.com> |
||
|
Vlad Ionescu
|
f59c122bee
|
opencode: Add support for OpenCode Go (#53651)
**TL;DR**: add support for OpenCode Go (flat-rate monthly subscription) along the already-implemented OpenCode Zed (pay-as-you-go billing). > [!WARNING] > This code was written by LLMs, under the supervision of a so-called developer that never wrote Rust profesionally and that spends more time in Pages&Keynote than in an IDE. Self-Review Checklist: - [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability - [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments - [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) - [ ] Tests cover the new/changed behavior - [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable ## Background OpenCode offers a few different ways to access models: - **free access to 3 models**, with feedback and data used to improve the model. These models use the OpenCode Zen API endpoints, but have different usage limits (200 requests per 5 hours) and have a different privacy policy. Some people disable or block the free models, some people are super-excited to have access to LLMs for free, and some people like using the free models to test new LLMs (at launch MiMo-V2 had 2 free weeks of usage, for example). - **pay-as-you-go access to 30 models** as part of the [OpenCode Zen](https://opencode.ai/zen) subscription. These models use the same OpenCode Zen API endpoints. - **flat-rate monthly access to 7 models** as part of the [OpenCode Go](https://opencode.ai/go) subscription. These models use the OpenCode Zen API endpoints with an extra `/go` appended to the path. There are 5-hour, weekly, and monthly usage limits and, additionally, users can toggle a switch in the OpenCode Console to use Zen models with their pay-as-you-go billing after the Go limits are hit. There's also a currently-paused [OpenCode Black](https://opencode.ai/black) flat-rate subscription with way higher usage limits and with access to more models, with $100 and $200 monthly plans. The whole thing is a bit messy, but it's great value and highly reliable LLM access! <br> https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/49589 added support for OpenCode Zen by implementing a new `opencode` provider. OpenCode Go [could be used by overriding the API URL](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/49589#issuecomment-4130300454), but that is a terrible user experience: some models have to be manually added, the model list always shows the 30-something OpenCode Zen models, and free models cannot be used at all. I was annoyed by the experience of using OpenCode Go with Zed and this past week I had to test a bunch of LLMs and providers and harnesses, so I took this on as a test case 🙂 ## Implementation This PR makes the OpenCode provider more general (not just for Zen) and adds an `OpenCodeModelSubscription` concept which is then used to implement support for OpenCode Go. The free models are also broken out into their own subscription for a prettier model list. For a better user experience, the different subscriptions can be enabled or disabled, both in the settings file and in the UX: <img width="434" height="176" alt="Screenshot showing the OpenCode provider configuration, with the newly added toggles" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3520e114-00c8-4794-84bf-35cd72d9c57e" /> The code was written by LLMs, but I do understand it and I did a bunch of "manual" iterations and "manual" tweaks. Still, my Rust experience is non-existent so **I won't feel offended if y'all reject this PR**! I did consider alternatives (adding a new `opencode-go` provider and renaming this to `opencode-zen`, for example, or adding support for custom API URLs in OpenCode custom models which would've been the smallest code change but a terrible user experience, and so on) but all alternatives would have been, in my opinion, a worse user experience. **Tests I did**: - confirmed OpenCode Go models work as expected - confirmed OpenCode Zen Free models work as expected - confirmed I get an error when trying to use OpenCode Zen models since I don't have that subscription - confirmed the subcription toggles work as expected (model are shown/hidden, settings file is updated) **Notes**: - this PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit. I did not create a separate PR for the model updates to minimize delays - my exeprience with Rust is roughly zero, but I tried to strike a balance between idiomatic Rust and easy-to-read code - users of the OpenCode provider might have to do some re-configuration after this PR is merged since the model identifiers now include the subscription, eg `claude-haiku-4-5` is now `zen/claude-haiku-4-5`. Since this is a relatively new provider and the impact is small, I preffered that rather than adding complex migration/mapping logic. - does changing the provider name from "OpenCode Zen" to "OpenCode" break anything for y'all at Zed? - does changing the telemetry id from `"opencode/<model-id>"` to `"opencode/<subscription>/<model-id>"` break anything for y'all at Zed? --- Release Notes: - OpenCode provider: add support for OpenCode Go --------- Co-authored-by: Ben Brandt <benjamin.j.brandt@gmail.com> |
||
Richard Feldman
|
87b47a4b08
|
Add Claude Opus 4.7 BYOK (#54077)
<img width="767" height="428" alt="Screenshot 2026-04-16 at 11 29 13 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e8b450fa-aefc-4dec-a286-b211bd492011" /> Add Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`) to the anthropic, bedrock, and opencode provider crates. Key specs: - 1M token context window - 128k max output tokens - Adaptive thinking support - AWS Bedrock cross-region inference (global, US, EU, AU) Release Notes: - Added Claude Opus 4.7 as an available language model |
||
grim
|
adb3533890
|
agent: Add Opencode Zen provider (#49589)
Before you mark this PR as ready for review, make sure that you have: - [x] Added a solid test coverage and/or screenshots from doing manual testing - [x] Done a self-review taking into account security and performance aspects - [x] Aligned any UI changes with the [UI checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist) Per Opencode's website: > Zen gives you access to a curated set of AI models that OpenCode has tested and benchmarked specifically for coding agents. No need to worry about inconsistent performance and quality, use validated models that work. > - [x] Testing select models and consulting their teams > - [x] Working with providers to ensure they're delivered properly > - [x] Benchmarking all model-provider combinations we recommend There are so many models available, but only a few work well with coding agents. Most providers configure them differently with varying results. The models under the Zen umbrella typically have a more reliable token(s) per second speed with minimal outages. The opencode ecosystem has improved my workflow if not many others' ! Release Notes: - Added [Opencode Zen](https://opencode.ai/zen) to list of providers --------- Co-authored-by: Ben Brandt <benjamin.j.brandt@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Bennet Bo Fenner <bennetbo@gmx.de> |