OpenAI-compatible providers currently cannot reuse Zed's OpenAI Chat
Completions transport unless they also adopt the exact OpenAI request
and response types. OpenRouter therefore maintained its own copy of
request construction, authentication, status handling, response reading,
and server-sent event framing.
This change extracts that mechanical transport into two provider-neutral
functions in `open_ai`: one for streaming requests and one for
non-streaming requests. They accept any serializable request envelope,
preserve custom headers and provider names, return untyped JSON for
provider-specific decoding, and retain typed failures for serialization,
request construction, HTTP transport, response reading, and
deserialization. The existing OpenAI entry points remain as
compatibility wrappers, so existing callers keep the same API and
behavior.
The abstraction deliberately stops at the wire boundary. OpenRouter
continues to own its request and response schemas, attribution headers,
routing controls, cache placement, and API-specific error
interpretation. It now adapts the shared framed stream into those
OpenRouter types instead of implementing a second HTTP and server-sent
event stack.
Moving OpenRouter onto the shared path also requires the ordinary Chat
Completions schema and event mapper to preserve compatible metadata that
OpenRouter already emits. This includes structured reasoning details
needed for replay, fragmented reasoning accumulation, prompt-cache read
and write usage, and thought signatures attached to tool calls. The
stream exposes `[DONE]` explicitly rather than treating it as
indistinguishable from an unexpected end of the response body.
OpenRouter's routing session identifier is hashed before transmission so
Zed's internal thread identifier is not exposed.
The diff is larger than the extracted transport alone because the shared
API is additive, the compatibility metadata must be represented in the
common wire types and event mapper, and the provider-specific adapter
remains intentionally independent. Roughly four hundred added lines are
focused transport, metadata, error-classification, attribution, caching,
and privacy tests. The provider-level OpenRouter implementation becomes
smaller while preserving its existing behavior.
Testing performed:
- `cargo test -p open_ai`
- `cargo test -p open_router`
- `cargo nextest run -p language_models open_router`
- `cargo check -p edit_prediction -p edit_prediction_cli`
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check`
- `./script/clippy -p open_ai -p open_router -p language_models -p
edit_prediction_cli`
- `cargo machete`
Release Notes:
- Improved OpenRouter reasoning continuity and request privacy.
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Holk <eric@zed.dev>
The Gentoo `ebuild` file format is a subset of a bash script, see
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Ebuild.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- Changed `ebuild` files to be recognized as bash.
Signed-off-by: gcarq <egger.m@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <kirill@zed.dev>
# Objective
Part of EP-10
Closes EP-118
- Describe the objective or issue this PR addresses.
- If you're fixing a specific issue, use "Fixes #X" for each issue as
[described in the GitHub
docs](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/using-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword).
## Solution
- Describe the solution used to achieve the objective above.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
## Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
## Showcase
> This section is optional. If this PR does not include a visual change
or does not add a new user-facing feature, you can delete this section.
- Help others understand the result of this PR by showcasing your
awesome work!
- If this PR includes a visual change, consider adding a screenshot,
GIF, or video
- A before/after comparison is very useful for changes to existing
features!
While a showcase should aim to be brief and digestible, you can use a
toggleable section to save space on longer showcases:
<details>
<summary>Click to view showcase</summary>
My super cool demos here
</details>
---
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Co-authored-by: Nbarry <nbarry@zed.dev>
# Objective
Closes EP-9
- Describe the objective or issue this PR addresses.
- If you're fixing a specific issue, use "Fixes #X" for each issue as
[described in the GitHub
docs](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/using-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword).
## Solution
- Describe the solution used to achieve the objective above.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
## Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
## Showcase
> This section is optional. If this PR does not include a visual change
or does not add a new user-facing feature, you can delete this section.
- Help others understand the result of this PR by showcasing your
awesome work!
- If this PR includes a visual change, consider adding a screenshot,
GIF, or video
- A before/after comparison is very useful for changes to existing
features!
While a showcase should aim to be brief and digestible, you can use a
toggleable section to save space on longer showcases:
<details>
<summary>Click to view showcase</summary>
My super cool demos here
</details>
---
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
---------
Co-authored-by: Oleksiy Syvokon <oleksiy.syvokon@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oleksiy Syvokon <oleksiy@zed.dev>
# Objective
Fix OpenAI-compatible reasoning/thinking support. Previously,
`OpenAiCompatibleLanguageModel` never reported thinking support, so
configured `reasoning_effort` values did not reliably reach the wire and
Responses API reasoning state could miss `include:
["reasoning.encrypted_content"]`.
Fixes#58289
Addresses #59207 for OpenAI-compatible Responses models configured with
`reasoning_effort`.
## Solution
- Treat a non-`none` configured `reasoning_effort` as OpenAI-compatible
thinking support.
- Expose common OpenAI-style effort levels in the agent UI, using the
configured effort as the default.
- Honor selected reasoning effort for OpenAI-compatible chat-completions
requests.
- Send `reasoning_effort: "none"` when thinking is disabled for a
configured reasoning model.
- Preserve native OpenAI behavior by continuing to use native
model-specific supported efforts and `max_completion_tokens`.
- Add an OpenAI-compatible `max_tokens_parameter` capability for
endpoints that expect output limits as `max_tokens`.
- Parse common streamed thinking fields (`reasoning` and
`reasoning_content`).
- Add provider setup UI and docs for configuring OpenAI-compatible
reasoning models.
## Testing
- `cargo fmt -p language_model_core -p agent_ui -p language_models`
- `cargo test -p language_models provider::open_ai_compatible::tests
--lib`
- `cargo test -p language_models provider::open_ai::tests --lib`
- `cargo test -p open_ai completion::tests --lib`
- `cargo test -p agent_ui
agent_configuration::add_llm_provider_modal::tests --lib`
- `git --no-pager diff --check`
## Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
---
Release Notes:
- Improved OpenAI-compatible provider setup for reasoning models.
---------
Co-authored-by: Anant Goel <anant@zed.dev>
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
# Objective
## Solution
- Describe the solution used to achieve the objective above.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
## Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
## Showcase
> This section is optional. If this PR does not include a visual change
or does not add a new user-facing feature, you can delete this section.
- Help others understand the result of this PR by showcasing your
awesome work!
- If this PR includes a visual change, consider adding a screenshot,
GIF, or video
- A before/after comparison is very useful for changes to existing
features!
While a showcase should aim to be brief and digestible, you can use a
toggleable section to save space on longer showcases:
<details>
<summary>Click to view showcase</summary>
My super cool demos here
</details>
---
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
# Objective
- Describe the objective or issue this PR addresses.
- If you're fixing a specific issue, use "Fixes #X" for each issue as
[described in the GitHub
docs](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/using-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword).
## Solution
- Describe the solution used to achieve the objective above.
## Testing
- Did you test these changes? If so, how?
- Are there any parts that need more testing?
- How can other people (reviewers) test your changes? Is there anything
specific they need to know?
- If relevant, what platforms did you test these changes on, and are
there any important ones you can't test?
## Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content adheres to Zed's UI standards
([UX/UI](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
and
[icon](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/crates/icons/README.md)
guidelines)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
## Showcase
> This section is optional. If this PR does not include a visual change
or does not add a new user-facing feature, you can delete this section.
- Help others understand the result of this PR by showcasing your
awesome work!
- If this PR includes a visual change, consider adding a screenshot,
GIF, or video
- A before/after comparison is very useful for changes to existing
features!
While a showcase should aim to be brief and digestible, you can use a
toggleable section to save space on longer showcases:
<details>
<summary>Click to view showcase</summary>
My super cool demos here
</details>
---
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Adds provider-side context compaction support to the Anthropic and
OpenAI API clients. Client plumbing only; not wired into the UI.
Release Notes:
- N/A
The `ep split-commit --split-point` argument now accepts split point
kinds:
* fim -- next edit is right under the cursor.
* same-file-near -- next edit is close to the cursor.
* same-file-far -- next edit is more than 30-lines away from cursor.
* cross-file -- next edit is in another file.
This lets us create datasets partitioned by kind more efficiently
compared to filtering them after the fact.
Release Notes:
- N/A
- Track average size of the retrieved context
- Support comma-separated values for `ep context --type`
- Exclude oracle from `editable` preset
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Co-authored-by: Nbarry <nbarry@zed.dev>
The `--related-context-limit` param controls how many tokens can we
allocate for editable context. Useful for evaluation primarly.
Release Notes:
- N/A
This change adds metrics for evaluating editable context collectors and
the collectors themselves:
- `cursor excerpt`: small area around the cursor.
- `current-file`: the full file that contains the cursor.
- `edit-history`: excerpts around edit history edits.
- `edit-history-file`: full files referenced by the edit history.
- `git-log`: files related to the cursor file according to recent git
co-change history.
- `oracle-file`: full files referenced by the expected patches. This is
an oracle/evaluation-only source because it uses the target patch.
Individual collectors can be enabled by passing a comma-separated list
like this: `ep context --type=edit-history,current-file`. There's also a
preset, `--type=editable`, which will enable all collectors except
oracle.
This change also adds the
`.prompt_input.related_files[0].excerpts[0].context_source` field.
Editable context is only accessible via ep-cli for now.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: Eric Holk <eric@zed.dev>
Add a `custom_headers` setting to each HTTP-based language model
provider
(Anthropic, Bedrock, DeepSeek, Google, LM Studio, Mistral, Ollama,
OpenAI,
OpenAI-compatible, OpenCode, OpenRouter, Vercel AI Gateway, and xAI) so
users
can attach extra headers to every outgoing request. Headers managed by
Zed
(authentication, content-type, etc.) cannot be overridden and are
skipped with
a warning.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- Added support for configuring custom HTTP headers on language model
providers via `language_models.<provider>.custom_headers`.
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <mail@aurabindo.in>
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Needed for use in cloud
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Maps the existing `Speed::Fast` plumbing to OpenAI's `service_tier:
"priority"`, which matches what "fast mode" in Codex does. Relevant docs
[here](https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat-create-service_tier).
Like for the existing Anthropic fast mode we have a
`Model::supports_priority` method for the variants on
https://openai.com/api-priority-processing. Pro, nano, and legacy gpt-4
are excluded; Custom defaults to false.
This is gated to staff only for now (not in this diff, but the existing
fast mode feature), until we have the mechanism to require confirmation
before you enable fast mode.
Release Notes:
- Added support for Fast Mode (priority service tier) on the OpenAI API
provider.
When generating a training or evaluation example with `ep split-commit`,
the cursor sampling logic becomes:
1. 80% chance of cursor being at the end of the source patch
2. 20% chance of cursor being at the beginning of the target patch
3. 20% chance of adding a jitter offset (same line, ±5 columns for now)
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
- limit diagnostics sent to teacher
- improve parallelism in `ep` commands when using `--max-parallelism` by
only grouping by repo when instructed too (repo grouping is only useful
for context collection)
- update rejected and rated queries to also fetch settled editable
region
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Switches the Anthropic provider from hand-stamping `cache_control` onto
the last message content block over to Anthropic's top-level automatic
prompt caching, paired with explicit long-TTL (1h) anchors on the last
tool definition and on the system prompt.
The prefix order `tools` → `system` → `messages` satisfies Anthropic's
requirement that longer TTLs appear earlier in the prefix, so the static
prefix is cached for 1h (surviving idle gaps longer than the 5-minute
default) while the rapidly-changing conversation tail uses the
free-to-refresh 5-minute TTL via the top-level automatic breakpoint.
Three of the four available cache breakpoints are used (last tool,
system, automatic conversation), leaving one in reserve.
As a side benefit, this fixes a latent issue where the previous stamping
loop could place `cache_control` on a `Thinking` content block, which
the Anthropic API does not allow. Automatic caching is documented to
walk past ineligible blocks (including thinking) when selecting its
breakpoint, so we now delegate that responsibility to the server.
The new shape we send (when caching is enabled):
```json
{
"tools": [{ "...": "...", "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral", "ttl": "1h"} }],
"system": [
{"type": "text", "text": "...", "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral", "ttl": "1h"}}
],
"messages": [ /* no per-block cache_control */ ],
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}
}
```
Release Notes:
- Improved Anthropic prompt cache utilization, reducing latency and cost
for ongoing conversations
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Ye <martinye022@gmail.com>
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A
`ep split --stratify=project` will use the first component of
`cursor_path`, which is a worktree name. This is an alternative to
`--stratify=repo` in absence of `repository_url`
Release Notes:
- N/A
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
Release Notes:
- Added interleaved_reasoning option to openai compatible models
---
This PR adds the interleaved_reasoning option for OpenAI-compatible
models, addressing the issue described in
https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/issues/20837.
In my testing, enabling interleaved_reasoning not only resolved the
tool-calling issues encountered by Qwen3.5 models in llama.cpp, but also
appeared to improve the model's coding capabilities. I have also
verified the outgoing requests using a proxy to ensure the parameter is
being sent correctly.It is also likely that this change will benefit
other models and providers as well.
Note: While I used AI to assist with the implementation, I have reviewed
and tested the changes. As I am relatively new to Rust and the Zed
codebase, I would appreciate any feedback or suggestions for
improvement. I am happy to make further adjustments if needed.
Thank you all for building such an amazing editor!
Co-authored-by: Oleksiy Syvokon <oleksiy@zed.dev>
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
This PR adds the `correctly_deleted_chars` field and updates `kept_rate`
to account for it, not just inserted chars.
It also adds `recall_rate` to measure coverage of reference
insertions/deletions.
Finally, it renames "final" to "reference" and "prediction" to
"candidate".
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [x] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Release Notes:
- N/A
Stacked on https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/pull/50566.
Begin collecting kept chars rate, as well as the count of tree-sitter
errors in the code before and after applying the prediction.
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [x] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
- `language_model` no longer depends on provider-specific crates such as
`anthropic` and `open_ai` (inverted dependency)
- `language_model_core` was extracted from `language_model` which
contains the types for the provider-specific crates to convert to/from.
- `gpui::SharedString` has been extracted into its own crate (still
exposed by `gpui`), so `language_model_core` and provider API crates
don't have to depend on `gpui`.
- Removes some unnecessary `&'static str` | `SharedString` -> `String`
-> `SharedString` conversions across the codebase.
- Extracts the core logic of the cloud `LanguageModelProvider` into its
own crate with simpler dependencies.
Release Notes:
- N/A
---------
Co-authored-by: John Tur <john-tur@outlook.com>
Self-Review Checklist:
- [x] I've reviewed my own diff for quality, security, and reliability
- [ ] Unsafe blocks (if any) have justifying comments
- [ ] The content is consistent with the [UI/UX
checklist](https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#uiux-checklist)
- [x] Tests cover the new/changed behavior
- [x] Performance impact has been considered and is acceptable
Closes #ISSUE
Release Notes:
- N/A or Added/Fixed/Improved ...
This PR decouples `language_model`'s dependence on Zed-specific
implementation details. In particular
* `credentials_provider` is split into a generic `credentials_provider`
crate that provides a trait, and `zed_credentials_provider` that
implements the said trait for Zed-specific providers and has functions
that can populate a global state with them
* `zed_env_vars` is split into a generic `env_var` crate that provides
generic tooling for managing env vars, and `zed_env_vars` that contains
Zed-specific statics
* `client` is now dependent on `language_model` and not vice versa
Release Notes:
- N/A
This PR mostly moves some code around. It also adds a high-level
`format_expected_output` function that routes patch formatting to
specific prompt formats. This was `zeta_prompt` can format
`expected_output` for training.
Keeping everything prompt-related in a "pure" module (with no heavy
dependencies) makes it easier to write bindings.
Release Notes:
- N/A
