mirror of
https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git
synced 2026-08-04 05:50:07 +00:00
5c867fe6de
Responds to maintainer review: "re-review" names the action badly — it
reads as "review again," which is the exact failure observed in the
field (fix reviewers re-running full reviews and package-wide suites
against explicit scope instructions). "Fix review" names the artifact
under review — the fix diff since the previous review — and makes the
scope self-enforcing.
Pure vocabulary substitution: re-review-prompt.md becomes
fix-review-prompt.md, SKILL.md and the review-package --role value
follow, and the term is introduced once as "a scoped fix review — a
review of the fix diff, not a fresh review." No behavioral rules
changed. Historical records (docs/superpowers/plans, specs,
RELEASE-NOTES) keep the old vocabulary; other skills' generic verb
usage ("no need to re-review") is untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| antigravity | ||
| brainstorm-server | ||
| claude-code | ||
| codex | ||
| codex-plugin-sync | ||
| explicit-skill-requests | ||
| hooks | ||
| kimi | ||
| opencode | ||
| pi | ||
| shell-lint | ||
| systematic-debugging | ||