docs(dag): add README documentation for examples

Add comprehensive documentation for all 13 DAG examples:

examples/README.md:
- Quick start guide with cargo commands
- Core examples: basic_usage, attention_demo, attention_selection,
  learning_workflow, self_healing
- Exotic examples: synthetic_haptic, synthetic_reflex_organism,
  timing_synchronization, coherence_safety, artificial_instincts,
  living_simulation, thought_integrity, federated_coherence
- Architecture diagram showing component relationships
- Key concepts: Tension, Coherence, Reflex Modes
- Performance notes and testing instructions

examples/exotic/README.md:
- Philosophy of coherence-sensing substrates
- Detailed explanation of each exotic example
- Core insight: intelligence as homeostasis
- Key metrics table (tension, coherence, cut value, criticality)
- References to related concepts (free energy principle, autopoiesis)
This commit is contained in:
Claude 2025-12-30 13:10:33 +00:00
parent a73aea8cef
commit cd63596316
2 changed files with 442 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
# RuVector DAG Examples
Comprehensive examples demonstrating the Neural Self-Learning DAG system.
## Quick Start
```bash
# Run any example
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example <name>
# Run with release optimizations
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example <name> --release
# Run tests for an example
cargo test -p ruvector-dag --example <name>
```
## Core Examples
### basic_usage
Fundamental DAG operations: creating nodes, adding edges, topological sort.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example basic_usage
```
**Demonstrates:**
- `QueryDag::new()`, `add_node()`, `add_edge()`
- `OperatorNode` types: SeqScan, Filter, Sort, Aggregate
- Topological iteration and depth computation
### attention_demo
All 7 attention mechanisms with visual output.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example attention_demo
```
**Demonstrates:**
- `TopologicalAttention` - DAG layer-based scoring
- `CriticalPathAttention` - Longest path weighting
- `CausalConeAttention` - Ancestor/descendant influence
- `MinCutGatedAttention` - Bottleneck-aware attention
- `HierarchicalLorentzAttention` - Hyperbolic embeddings
- `ParallelBranchAttention` - Branch parallelism scoring
- `TemporalBTSPAttention` - Time-aware plasticity
### attention_selection
UCB bandit algorithm for dynamic mechanism selection.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example attention_selection
```
**Demonstrates:**
- `AttentionSelector` with UCB1 exploration/exploitation
- Automatic mechanism performance tracking
- Adaptive selection based on observed rewards
### learning_workflow
Complete SONA learning pipeline with trajectory recording.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example learning_workflow
```
**Demonstrates:**
- `DagSonaEngine` initialization and training
- `DagTrajectoryBuffer` for lock-free trajectory collection
- `DagReasoningBank` for pattern storage
- MicroLoRA fast adaptation
- EWC++ continual learning
### self_healing
Autonomous anomaly detection and repair system.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example self_healing
```
**Demonstrates:**
- `HealingOrchestrator` configuration
- `AnomalyDetector` with statistical thresholds
- `LearningDriftDetector` for performance degradation
- Custom `RepairStrategy` implementations
- Health score computation
## Exotic Examples
These examples explore unconventional applications of coherence-sensing substrates—systems that respond to internal tension rather than external commands.
### synthetic_haptic ⭐ NEW
Complete nervous system for machines: sensor → reflex → actuator with memory and learning.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example synthetic_haptic
```
**Architecture:**
| Layer | Component | Purpose |
|-------|-----------|---------|
| 1 | Event Sensing | Microsecond timestamps, 6-channel input |
| 2 | Reflex Arc | DAG tension + MinCut → ReflexMode |
| 3 | HDC Memory | 256-dim hypervector associative memory |
| 4 | SONA Learning | Coherence-gated adaptation |
| 5 | Actuation | Energy-budgeted force + vibro output |
**Key Concepts:**
- Intelligence as homeostasis, not goal-seeking
- Tension drives immediate response
- Coherence gates learning (only when stable)
- ReflexModes: Calm → Active → Spike → Protect
**Performance:** 192 μs avg loop @ 1000 Hz
### synthetic_reflex_organism
Intelligence as homeostasis—organisms that minimize stress without explicit goals.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example synthetic_reflex_organism
```
**Demonstrates:**
- `ReflexOrganism` with metabolic rate and tension tracking
- `OrganismResponse`: Rest, Contract, Expand, Partition, Rebalance
- Learning only when instability crosses thresholds
- No objectives, only stress minimization
### timing_synchronization
Machines that "feel" timing through phase alignment.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example timing_synchronization
```
**Demonstrates:**
- Phase-locked loops using DAG coherence
- Biological rhythm synchronization
- Timing deviation as tension signal
- Self-correcting temporal alignment
### coherence_safety
Safety as structural property—systems that shut down when coherence drops.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example coherence_safety
```
**Demonstrates:**
- `SafetyEnvelope` with coherence thresholds
- Automatic graceful degradation
- No external safety monitors needed
- Structural shutdown mechanisms
### artificial_instincts
Hardwired biases via MinCut boundaries and attention patterns.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example artificial_instincts
```
**Demonstrates:**
- Instinct encoding via graph structure
- MinCut-enforced behavioral boundaries
- Attention-weighted decision biases
- Healing as instinct restoration
### living_simulation
Simulations that model fragility, not just outcomes.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example living_simulation
```
**Demonstrates:**
- Coherence as simulation health metric
- Fragility-aware state evolution
- Self-healing simulation repair
- Tension-driven adaptation
### thought_integrity
Reasoning monitored like electrical voltage—coherence as correctness signal.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example thought_integrity
```
**Demonstrates:**
- Reasoning chain as DAG structure
- Coherence drops indicate logical errors
- Self-correcting inference
- Integrity verification without external validation
### federated_coherence
Distributed consensus through coherence, not voting.
```bash
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example federated_coherence
```
**Demonstrates:**
- `FederatedNode` with peer coherence tracking
- 7 message types for distributed coordination
- Pattern propagation via coherence alignment
- Consensus emerges from structural agreement
## Architecture Overview
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ QueryDag │
│ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ ┌─────┐ │
│ │Scan │──▶│Filter│──▶│Agg │──▶│Sort │──▶│Result│ │
│ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ └─────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐
│ Attention │ │ MinCut │ │ SONA │
│ Mechanisms │ │ Engine │ │ Learning │
│ (7 types) │ │ (tension) │ │ (coherence) │
└───────────────┘ └───────────────┘ └───────────────┘
│ │ │
└───────────────────┴───────────────────┘
┌───────────────┐
│ Healing │
│ Orchestrator │
└───────────────┘
```
## Key Concepts
### Tension
How far the current state is from homeostasis. Computed from:
- MinCut flow capacity stress
- Node criticality deviation
- Sensor/input anomalies
**Usage:** Drives immediate reflex-level responses.
### Coherence
How consistent the internal state is over time. Drops when:
- Tension changes rapidly
- Partitioning becomes unstable
- Learning causes drift
**Usage:** Gates learning and safety decisions.
### Reflex Modes
| Mode | Tension | Behavior |
|------|---------|----------|
| Calm | < 0.20 | Minimal response, learning allowed |
| Active | 0.20-0.55 | Proportional response |
| Spike | 0.55-0.85 | Heightened response, haptic feedback |
| Protect | > 0.85 | Protective shutdown, no output |
## Running All Examples
```bash
# Quick verification
for ex in basic_usage attention_demo attention_selection \
learning_workflow self_healing synthetic_haptic; do
echo "=== $ex ===" && cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example $ex 2>/dev/null | head -20
done
# Exotic examples
for ex in synthetic_reflex_organism timing_synchronization coherence_safety \
artificial_instincts living_simulation thought_integrity federated_coherence; do
echo "=== $ex ===" && cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example $ex 2>/dev/null | head -20
done
```
## Testing
```bash
# Run all example tests
cargo test -p ruvector-dag --examples
# Test specific example
cargo test -p ruvector-dag --example synthetic_haptic
```
## Performance Notes
- **Attention**: O(V+E) for topological, O(V²) for causal cone
- **MinCut**: O(n^0.12) amortized with caching
- **SONA Learning**: Background thread, non-blocking
- **Haptic Loop**: Target <1ms, achieved ~200μs average
## License
MIT - See repository root for details.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
# Exotic Examples: Coherence-Sensing Substrates
These examples explore systems that respond to internal tension rather than external commands—where intelligence emerges as homeostasis.
## Philosophy
Traditional AI systems are goal-directed: they receive objectives and optimize toward them. These examples flip that model:
> **Intelligence as maintaining coherence under perturbation.**
A system doesn't need goals if it can feel when it's "out of tune" and naturally moves toward equilibrium.
## The Examples
### 1. synthetic_reflex_organism.rs
**Intelligence as Homeostasis**
No goals, only stress minimization. The organism responds to tension by adjusting its internal state, learning only when instability crosses thresholds.
```rust
pub enum OrganismResponse {
Rest, // Low tension: do nothing
Contract, // Rising tension: consolidate
Expand, // Stable low tension: explore
Partition, // High tension: segment
Rebalance, // Oscillating: redistribute
}
```
### 2. timing_synchronization.rs
**Machines That Feel Timing**
Phase-locked loops using DAG coherence. The system "feels" when its internal rhythms drift from external signals and self-corrects.
```rust
// Timing is not measured, it's felt
let phase_error = self.measure_phase_deviation();
let tension = self.dag.compute_tension_from_timing(phase_error);
self.adjust_internal_clock(tension);
```
### 3. coherence_safety.rs
**Structural Safety**
Safety isn't a monitor checking outputs—it's a structural property. When coherence drops below threshold, the system naturally enters a safe state.
```rust
// No safety rules, just coherence
if coherence < 0.3 {
// System structurally cannot produce dangerous output
// because the pathways become disconnected
}
```
### 4. artificial_instincts.rs
**Hardwired Biases**
Instincts encoded via MinCut boundaries and attention patterns. These aren't learned—they're structural constraints that shape behavior.
```rust
// Fear isn't learned, it's architectural
let fear_boundary = mincut.compute(threat_region, action_region);
if fear_boundary.cut_value < threshold {
// Action pathway is structurally blocked
}
```
### 5. living_simulation.rs
**Fragility-Aware Modeling**
Simulations that model not just outcomes, but structural health. The simulation knows when it's "sick" and can heal itself.
```rust
// Simulation health = structural coherence
let health = simulation.dag.coherence();
if health < 0.5 {
simulation.trigger_healing();
}
```
### 6. thought_integrity.rs
**Reasoning Monitored Like Voltage**
Logical inference as a DAG where coherence indicates correctness. Errors show up as tension in the reasoning graph.
```rust
// Contradiction creates structural tension
let reasoning = build_inference_dag(premises, conclusion);
let integrity = reasoning.coherence();
// Low integrity = likely logical error
```
### 7. federated_coherence.rs
**Consensus Through Coherence**
Distributed systems that agree not by voting, but by structural alignment. Nodes synchronize patterns when their coherence matrices align.
```rust
pub enum FederationMessage {
Heartbeat { coherence: f32 },
ProposePattern { pattern: DagPattern },
ValidatePattern { id: String, local_coherence: f32 },
RejectPattern { id: String, tension_source: String },
TensionAlert { severity: f32, region: Vec<usize> },
SyncRequest { since_round: u64 },
SyncResponse { patterns: Vec<DagPattern> },
}
```
## Core Insight
These systems demonstrate that:
1. **Intelligence doesn't require goals** — maintaining structure is sufficient
2. **Safety can be architectural** — not a bolt-on monitor
3. **Learning should be gated** — only update when stable
4. **Consensus can emerge** — from structural agreement, not voting
## Running
```bash
# Run all exotic examples
for ex in synthetic_reflex_organism timing_synchronization \
coherence_safety artificial_instincts living_simulation \
thought_integrity federated_coherence; do
cargo run -p ruvector-dag --example $ex
done
```
## Key Metrics
| Metric | Meaning | Healthy Range |
|--------|---------|---------------|
| Tension | Deviation from equilibrium | < 0.3 |
| Coherence | Structural consistency | > 0.8 |
| Cut Value | Flow capacity stress | < 100 |
| Criticality | Node importance | 0.0-1.0 |
## Further Reading
These concepts draw from:
- Homeostatic regulation in biological systems
- Free energy principle (Friston)
- Autopoiesis (Maturana & Varela)
- Active inference
- Predictive processing
The key shift: from "what should I do?" to "how do I stay coherent?"