mirror of
https://github.com/QwenLM/qwen-code.git
synced 2026-04-29 12:11:09 +00:00
afbb5e71db
* feat(cli): make recap away-threshold configurable The 5-minute blur threshold was hard-coded. Confirmed from Claude Code's own binary (v2.1.113) that 5 minutes is their default as well (and that they shift to 60 minutes when 1h prompt-cache is active) — so the default stays, but expose it as `general.sessionRecapAway ThresholdMinutes` for users who briefly alt-tab often and don't want recaps piling up, or who want to lower it for testing. Non-positive / unset values fall back to the 5-minute default, so dropping the key has the same behavior as before. * fix(core): align recap prompt with Claude Code (1-2 sentences, ≤40 words) The earlier "exactly one sentence, 80-char cap" was an over-correction to a single in-the-moment ask. Going back to it: the natural shape of "current task + next action" is two clauses, and forcing them into a single sentence either crams them with a semicolon or drops the next action entirely on complex sessions. Adopt Claude Code's prompt verbatim (extracted from the v2.1.113 binary): "under 40 words, 1-2 plain sentences, no markdown. Lead with the overall goal and current task, then the one next action. Skip root-cause narrative, fix internals, secondary to-dos, and em-dash tangents." Add a Chinese-budget note (~80 chars) and keep the <recap>...</recap> wrapping that protects against reasoning-model preambles leaking into the UI. The sticky banner already re-measures controls height when the recap toggles, so a 2-line render lays out cleanly. Sweep "one-line" out of user-facing copy (settings description, slash-command description, feature docs, design doc) so the documentation matches the new shape. * fix(cli): restore "one-line" in user-facing recap copy Verified from the Claude Code v2.1.113 binary that the slash-command description IS literally "Generate a one-line session recap now" even though the underlying prompt allows 1-2 sentences. Claude Code is deliberately setting a tighter user expectation than the prompt guarantees, which keeps the surface feel "glanceable". Mirror that asymmetry: keep the prompt at 1-2 sentences (the previous commit) for behavioral parity, but put "one-line" back in the user- visible copy (slash-command description, settings description, user docs). Internal design doc keeps the accurate "1-2 sentence" wording. * fix(cli): render recap inline in history to match Claude Code Earlier I read the user's complaint that the recap "scrolled away" as "the recap should be sticky above the input box," and built a sticky banner accordingly. Disassembly of the Claude Code v2.1.113 binary shows the actual behavior is the opposite: their away_summary is a plain `type:"system", subtype:"away_summary"` message dispatched through the standard message renderer (no Static, no anchor, no flexbox pinning) — it scrolls with the conversation like every other system message. Tear out the sticky-banner machinery so recap matches that: - Recap is back in the `HistoryItemWithoutId` union and `addItem`'d into history (both from `/recap` and from auto-trigger), so it serializes into session saves and behaves like every other history item — no special clear paths, no resume-wrapper, no layout-effect re-measure dance. - `useAwaySummary` takes `addItem` again instead of a setter callback. - `AwayRecapMessage` renders the way Claude Code does: a 2-column gutter with `※`, then bold "recap: " and italic content, all in dim color. Drop the prior `StatusMessage`-shaped layout that fused prefix and label into "※ recap:". - Remove the AppContainer plumbing, the slashCommandProcessor state, the UIStateContext fields, the DefaultAppLayout / ScreenReader placement blocks, the test-utils mocks, and the noninteractive stub. Restore `useResumeCommand.handleResume` to a void return since callers no longer need the success boolean. Sweep the design doc so the architecture diagram, files table, and hook deps reflect the inline-history flow. * fix(cli): dedupe back-to-back auto-recaps with no new user turns between Two consecutive blur cycles, each over the threshold but with no new user activity in between, would each fire their own auto-recap and add two near-duplicate entries to history (same task, slightly different wording from temperature-driven LLM variance). Reported case: leaving the terminal twice while a /review of one PR was still on screen produced two recaps both about that same review. Add a `shouldFireRecap` gate before kicking off the LLM call: - Need at least 3 user messages in history total (don't fire on a near-empty session). - If a previous away_recap is already in history, need at least 2 new user messages since that one before another can fire. Same shape as Claude Code's `Ic1` gate (`Sc1=3`, `Rc1=2`). Read history through a ref so this isn't in the effect's deps and the effect doesn't re-run on every message. * fix(cli): type useResumeCommand.handleResume as Promise<void> Per gemini review on #3482: the interface declared this as `() => void` but the implementation is `async` and returns `Promise<void>`. The mismatch silently lost the chainable promise — tests had to launder it through `as unknown as Promise<void> | undefined` just to await. Tighten the interface to `Promise<void>` and drop the cast in the "closes the dialog immediately" test. * fix(cli): persist auto-fired recap to chat recording so /resume keeps it Per yiliang114 review on #3482: the manual `/recap` path persists across `/resume` because the slash-command processor records every output history item via `chatRecorder.recordSlashCommand({ phase: 'result', outputHistoryItems })`, but the auto path called `addItem` directly and bypassed that recorder. The result was an asymmetry where users who triggered recap manually saw it after `/resume`, while users whose recap fired automatically lost it. Mirror the manual recording from useAwaySummary's `.then` callback — record only the `result` phase (not invocation, since we don't want a fake `> /recap` user line replayed) with the away-recap item as the single output. Wrapped in try/catch because recap is best-effort and must never surface a failure to the user. Add useAwaySummary.test.ts covering: - the recording path is taken on a successful auto-trigger - the dedup gate (`shouldFireRecap`) suppresses the LLM call entirely, including the recording, when no new user turns happened since the last recap * fix(cli): cast recap item via spread to satisfy strict tsc --build CI's `tsc --build` (stricter than local `tsc --noEmit`) rejected the direct `item as Record<string, unknown>` cast: HistoryItemAwayRecap's literal `type: 'away_recap'` field doesn't overlap with `unknown`, TS2352. Use the `{ ...item } as Record<string, unknown>` spread pattern that the rest of the codebase (arenaCommand, slashCommandProcessor's serializer) already uses for the same SlashCommandRecordPayload field. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| .vscode | ||
| assets | ||
| schemas | ||
| scripts | ||
| src | ||
| .vscodeignore | ||
| development.md | ||
| esbuild.js | ||
| eslint.config.mjs | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| NOTICES.txt | ||
| package.json | ||
| postcss.config.js | ||
| README.md | ||
| tailwind.config.js | ||
| tsconfig.json | ||
| vitest.config.ts | ||
Qwen Code Companion
Seamlessly integrate Qwen Code into Visual Studio Code with native IDE features and an intuitive chat interface. This extension bundles everything you need — no additional installation required.
Demo
Features
- Native IDE experience: Dedicated Qwen Code Chat panel accessed via the Qwen icon in the editor title bar
- Native diffing: Review, edit, and accept changes in VS Code's diff view
- Auto-accept edits mode: Automatically apply Qwen's changes as they're made
- File management: @-mention files or attach files and images using the system file picker
- Conversation history & multiple sessions: Access past conversations and run multiple sessions simultaneously
- Open file & selection context: Share active files, cursor position, and selections for more precise help
Requirements
- Visual Studio Code 1.85.0 or newer (also works with Cursor, Windsurf, and other VS Code-based editors)
Quick Start
-
Install from the VS Code Marketplace or Open VSX Registry
-
Open the Chat panel using one of these methods:
- Click the Qwen icon in the top-right corner of the editor
- Run
Qwen Code: Openfrom the Command Palette (Cmd+Shift+P/Ctrl+Shift+P)
-
Start chatting — Ask Qwen to help with coding tasks, explain code, fix bugs, or write new features
Commands
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
Qwen Code: Open |
Open the Qwen Code Chat panel |
Qwen Code: Run |
Launch a classic terminal session with the bundled CLI |
Qwen Code: Accept Current Diff |
Accept the currently displayed diff |
Qwen Code: Close Diff Editor |
Close/reject the current diff |
Feedback & Issues
Contributing
We welcome contributions! See our Contributing Guide for details on:
- Setting up the development environment
- Building and debugging the extension locally
- Submitting pull requests
Terms of Service and Privacy Notice
By installing this extension, you agree to the Terms of Service.