1. Remove gh pr checkout --detach (modifies working tree, defeats
worktree purpose). Use git fetch only.
2. Add dependency installation step (npm ci etc.) in worktree —
without it, all TS/JS linting/building fails.
3. Cache and reports written to main project dir, not worktree
(would be deleted in Step 5).
4. "fix these issues" tip only for local reviews — worktree is
cleaned up after PR review, so interactive fixing not possible.
5. Autofix push uses explicit remote branch name from Step 1.
6. Move incremental check before dependency install to avoid
wasting time when no new changes.
7. Fix Step 3 reference: "from Steps 2.5 and 2.6" (includes
reverse audit findings).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replace the stash + checkout + restore flow with an isolated git
worktree for PR reviews. This eliminates:
- Stash orphan risks (multiple early exit paths)
- Wrong-branch risks (Step 5 restore failures)
- Build cache pollution (worktree has its own state)
- All stash-related error handling complexity
New flow:
- Step 1: git worktree add .qwen/tmp/review-pr-<number>
- All agents operate in the worktree directory
- Autofix commits and pushes from the worktree
- Step 5: git worktree remove (--force for dirty worktrees)
User's working tree is never modified during PR reviews.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
For PR reviews, fetch existing inline and general comments via gh api
before launching agents. A summary of already-discussed issues is
passed to agents so they don't re-report problems that humans or other
tools have already flagged.
Added to Exclusion Criteria: "Issues already discussed in existing
PR comments."
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The incremental review cache now stores modelId alongside commitSha.
When the same PR is re-reviewed with a different model:
- Cache detects model change → runs full review (not skipped)
- Informs user: "Previous review used X. Running full review with Y
for a second opinion."
Same SHA + same model still skips as before.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add Step 2.6: after all findings are verified and aggregated, a single
reverse audit agent reviews the diff with full knowledge of what was
already found, specifically looking for important issues that all
previous agents missed.
- Only reports Critical/Suggestion level gaps (not Nice to have)
- Findings go through the same verification as other agents
- Single agent call — minimal cost overhead
- If nothing is found, initial review had strong coverage
This formalizes the "multi-round undirected audit" pattern that proved
effective during the development of this PR (14 rounds, 40+ issues).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add comprehensive user documentation for the /review command covering:
- Quick start examples for all modes (local, PR, file, --comment)
- Pipeline overview with all steps explained
- Review agents table (5 agents + their focus areas)
- Deterministic analysis (supported languages and tools)
- Severity levels and PR comment filtering rules
- Autofix workflow
- PR inline comments (what gets posted vs terminal-only)
- Follow-up actions (fix/post comments/commit)
- Project review rules (.qwen/review-rules.md etc.)
- Incremental review and caching
- Review report persistence
- Cross-file impact analysis
- Design philosophy
Also add /review and /simplify to the commands reference page
under a new "Built-in Skills" section with link to full docs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
