feat(docs): add qwen-code skills, agents, and updated AGENTS.md (#3575)
Some checks are pending
Qwen Code CI / CodeQL (push) Waiting to run
Qwen Code CI / Lint (push) Waiting to run
Qwen Code CI / Test (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Test-1 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Test-2 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Test-3 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Test-4 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Test-5 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Test-6 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Test-7 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Test-8 (push) Blocked by required conditions
Qwen Code CI / Post Coverage Comment (push) Blocked by required conditions
E2E Tests / E2E Test (Linux) - sandbox:docker (push) Waiting to run
E2E Tests / E2E Test (Linux) - sandbox:none (push) Waiting to run
E2E Tests / E2E Test - macOS (push) Waiting to run

- Add new skills: bugfix, feat-dev with structured workflows
- Update existing skills: docs-audit-and-refresh, docs-update-from-diff,
  e2e-testing, qwen-code-claw, structured-debugging, terminal-capture
- Update test-engineer agent with clearer constraints and formatting
- Update qc commands: bugfix, code-review, commit, create-issue, create-pr
- Reorganize .gitignore to keep qwen configs near top
- Expand AGENTS.md with development commands, feature/bugfix workflows,
  project directories table, and code review guidelines

Co-authored-by: 愚远 <zhenxing.tzx@alibaba-inc.com>
Co-authored-by: Qwen-Coder <qwen-coder@alibabacloud.com>
This commit is contained in:
tanzhenxin 2026-04-24 17:33:03 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 2815a2fcd7
commit e47b22806b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
20 changed files with 892 additions and 438 deletions

View file

@ -1,26 +1,29 @@
# Audit Checklist
Use this checklist to keep repository-wide documentation audits focused and repeatable.
Use this checklist to keep repository-wide documentation audits focused and
repeatable.
## High-signal repository surfaces
- `packages/cli/**`
Inspect commands, flows, prompts, flags, and CLI-facing behavior.
- `packages/core/**`
Inspect shared behavior, settings, tools, provider integration, and feature semantics.
- `packages/sdk-typescript/**` and `packages/sdk-java/**`
Inspect SDK setup, usage, and examples that may affect developer docs.
- `packages/vscode-ide-companion/**`, `packages/zed-extension/**`, and related integration packages
Inspect IDE and extension behavior that should be reflected in user docs.
- `docs/**/_meta.ts`
Inspect navigation completeness after creating or moving pages.
- `packages/cli/**` Inspect commands, flows, prompts, flags, and CLI-facing
behavior.
- `packages/core/**` Inspect shared behavior, settings, tools, provider
integration, and feature semantics.
- `packages/sdk-typescript/**` and `packages/sdk-java/**` Inspect SDK setup,
usage, and examples that may affect developer docs.
- `packages/vscode-ide-companion/**`, `packages/zed-extension/**`, and related
integration packages Inspect IDE and extension behavior that should be
reflected in user docs.
- `docs/**/_meta.ts` Inspect navigation completeness after creating or moving
pages.
## Gap detection prompts
Ask these questions while comparing the repo to `docs/`:
- Does a visible feature exist in code but have no page or section in `docs/`?
- Does a docs page mention a command, setting, provider, or path that no longer exists?
- Does a docs page mention a command, setting, provider, or path that no longer
exists?
- Do examples still match the current repository layout and command syntax?
- Is a page present but hidden or missing from `_meta.ts`?
- Do multiple pages describe the same feature inconsistently?
@ -38,4 +41,5 @@ Ask these questions while comparing the repo to `docs/`:
- Prefer a small number of precise edits over a speculative docs rewrite.
- Leave a clear summary of what was missing, wrong, or stale.
- If the audit uncovers a larger docs reorganization, fix the highest-impact inaccuracies first and note the remaining work.
- If the audit uncovers a larger docs reorganization, fix the highest-impact
inaccuracies first and note the remaining work.