Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ouroboros
ec3fc6e5b5 fix: preserve review evidence and tool delivery semantics 2026-09-09 15:18:56 +03:00
Anton Razzhigaev
f627fa835d Contributor review: agentic checklist path, honest script-lane budget shape (#395)
- CONTRIBUTING makes the agentic checklist review the main path: the
  separate review agent covers all eight Intent/Scope checklist items from
  docs/CHECKLISTS.md under that checklist's own output contract, and the
  JSON receipt lands in the PR's review-evidence block (validated locally by
  scripts/validate_scope_receipt.py — a thin CLI over the runtime
  normalize_scope_items contract, no CI workflow changes).
- The project-native review command is honestly labeled maintainer /
  large-window tooling: the scope pack is required regardless of diff size
  and can exceed a default install's scope window (SCOPE_REVIEW_BLOCKED);
  the documented larger-window routes are an agent_session scope row or an
  API slot whose confirmed window fits the pack.
- Reading requirements proportioned: docs/CHECKLISTS.md stays
  read-in-full; the other four documents are mapped by headings with every
  relevant section read in full.
- PR template: scope-checklist coverage table + reviewer JSON block inside
  the single review-evidence section; governance wording matches.
- tests/test_contributor_flow.py pins the new copy and exercises the
  validator against the real contract (coverage, duplicates, broken JSON).
2026-08-31 15:51:01 +00:00