mirror of
https://github.com/vel21ripn/nDPI.git
synced 2026-05-02 17:00:16 +00:00
a7c2734b38
Basically: * "classification by-ip" (i.e. `flow->guessed_protocol_id_by_ip` is NEVER returned in the protocol stack (i.e. `flow->detected_protocol_stack[]`); * if the application is interested into such information, it can access `ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip` itself. There are mainly 4 points in the code that set the "classification by-ip" in the protocol stack: the generic `ndpi_set_detected_protocol()`/ `ndpi_detection_giveup()` functions and the HTTP/STUN dissectors. In the unit tests output, a print about `ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip` has been added for each flow: the huge diff of this commit is mainly due to that. Strictly speaking, this change is NOT an API/ABI breakage, but there are important differences in the classification results. For examples: * TLS flows without the initial handshake (or without a matching SNI/certificate) are simply classified as `TLS`; * similar for HTTP or QUIC flows; * DNS flows without a matching request domain are simply classified as `DNS`; we don't have `DNS/Google` anymore just because the server is 8.8.8.8 (that was an outrageous behaviour...); * flows previusoly classified only "by-ip" are now classified as `NDPI_PROTOCOL_UNKNOWN`. See #1425 for other examples of why adding the "classification by-ip" in the protocol stack is a bad idea. Please, note that IPV6 is not supported :( (long standing issue in nDPI) i.e. `ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip` wil be always `NDPI_PROTOCOL_UNKNOWN` for IPv6 flows. Define `NDPI_CONFIDENCE_MATCH_BY_IP` has been removed. Close #1687
25 lines
2 KiB
Text
25 lines
2 KiB
Text
Guessed flow protos: 0
|
|
|
|
DPI Packets (TCP): 8 (4.00 pkts/flow)
|
|
Confidence DPI : 2 (flows)
|
|
Num dissector calls: 64 (32.00 diss/flow)
|
|
LRU cache ookla: 0/0/0 (insert/search/found)
|
|
LRU cache bittorrent: 0/0/0 (insert/search/found)
|
|
LRU cache zoom: 0/0/0 (insert/search/found)
|
|
LRU cache stun: 0/0/0 (insert/search/found)
|
|
LRU cache tls_cert: 0/0/0 (insert/search/found)
|
|
LRU cache mining: 2/0/0 (insert/search/found)
|
|
LRU cache msteams: 0/0/0 (insert/search/found)
|
|
Automa host: 0/0 (search/found)
|
|
Automa domain: 0/0 (search/found)
|
|
Automa tls cert: 0/0 (search/found)
|
|
Automa risk mask: 0/0 (search/found)
|
|
Automa common alpns: 0/0 (search/found)
|
|
Patricia risk mask: 4/0 (search/found)
|
|
Patricia risk: 0/0 (search/found)
|
|
Patricia protocols: 4/0 (search/found)
|
|
|
|
Mining 319 166676 2
|
|
|
|
1 TCP 192.168.2.148:46838 <-> 94.23.199.191:3333 [proto: 42/Mining][IP: 0/Unknown][ClearText][Confidence: DPI][cat: Mining/99][159 pkts/143155 bytes <-> 113 pkts/13204 bytes][Goodput ratio: 93/43][1091.42 sec][ZCash/Monero][bytes ratio: 0.831 (Upload)][IAT c2s/s2c min/avg/max/stddev: 0/0 7234/8131 71734/71815 15224/15291][Pkt Len c2s/s2c min/avg/max/stddev: 66/66 900/117 1514/376 709/99][Risk: ** Known Proto on Non Std Port **** Unsafe Protocol **][Risk Score: 60][PLAIN TEXT (method)][Plen Bins: 28,2,0,1,0,0,0,0,0,8,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,29,29,0,0]
|
|
2 TCP 192.168.2.148:53846 <-> 116.211.167.195:3333 [proto: 42/Mining][IP: 0/Unknown][ClearText][Confidence: DPI][cat: Mining/99][24 pkts/4455 bytes <-> 23 pkts/5862 bytes][Goodput ratio: 70/78][1065.16 sec][ZCash/Monero][bytes ratio: -0.136 (Mixed)][IAT c2s/s2c min/avg/max/stddev: 0/0 46166/51528 195463/195463 61020/65306][Pkt Len c2s/s2c min/avg/max/stddev: 54/60 186/255 1498/364 395/138][Risk: ** Known Proto on Non Std Port **** Unsafe Protocol **][Risk Score: 60][PLAIN TEXT (method)][Plen Bins: 4,13,4,8,0,0,0,0,0,61,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,4,4,0,0]
|