- TCP fingerprint
- JA4 fingepriint
- TLS SHA1 certificate (if present), or JA3S fingerprint (is SHA1 is missing)
By default the fingerprint uses the client and server fingerprints (format 0)
and combines them. However you can chnge it format (eg. use only the client info,
format 1) with
--cfg NULL,metadata.ndpi_fingerprint_format,X
where X is the fingerprint format.
By default nDPI fingerprint is enabled but you can enable/disble it as follows
--cfg NULL,metadata.ndpi_fingerprint,0
The idea is to remove the limitation of only two protocols ("master" and
"app") in the flow classifcation.
This is quite handy expecially for STUN flows and, in general, for any
flows where there is some kind of transitionf from a cleartext protocol
to TLS: HTTP_PROXY -> TLS/Youtube; SMTP -> SMTPS (via STARTTLS msg).
In the vast majority of the cases, the protocol stack is simply
Master/Application.
Examples of real stacks (from the unit tests) different from the standard
"master/app":
* "STUN.WhatsAppCall.SRTP": a WA call
* "STUN.DTLS.GoogleCall": a Meet call
* "Telegram.STUN.DTLS.TelegramVoip": a Telegram call
* "SMTP.SMTPS.Google": a SMTP connection to Google server started in
cleartext and updated to TLS
* "HTTP.Google.ntop": a HTTP connection to a Google domain (match via
"Host" header) and to a ntop server (match via "Server" header)
The logic to create the stack is still a bit coarse: we have a decade of
code try to push everything in only ywo protocols... Therefore, the
content of the stack is still **highly experimental** and might change
in the next future; do you have any suggestions?
It is quite likely that the legacy fields "master_protocol" and
"app_protocol" will be there for a long time.
Add some helper to use the stack:
```
ndpi_stack_get_upper_proto();
ndpi_stack_get_lower_proto();
bool ndpi_stack_contains(struct ndpi_proto_stack *s, u_int16_t proto_id);
bool ndpi_stack_is_tls_like(struct ndpi_proto_stack *s);
bool ndpi_stack_is_http_like(struct ndpi_proto_stack *s);
```
Be sure new stack logic is compatible with legacy code:
```
assert(ndpi_stack_get_upper_proto(&flow->detected_protocol.protocol_stack) ==
ndpi_get_upper_proto(flow->detected_protocol));
assert(ndpi_stack_get_lower_proto(&flow->detected_protocol.protocol_stack) ==
ndpi_get_lower_proto(flow->detected_protocol));
```
This function is always called once for every flow, as last code
processing the flow itself.
As a first usage example, check here if the flow is unidirectional
(instead of checking it at every packets)
This way, the `ndpiReader` output doesn't change if we change the
internal logic about the order we set/check the various flow risks.
Note that the flow risk *list* is already printed by `ndpiReader`
in order.
* Revert "Added fix for handling Server Hello before CLient Hello"
This reverts commit eb15b22e77.
* TLS: add some tests with unidirectional traffic
* TLS: another attempt to process CH received after the SH
Obviously, we will process unidirectional traffic longer, because we are
now waiting for messages in both directions
The Train Real Time Data Protocol (TRDP) is a UDP/TCP-based communication protocol designed for IP networks in trains, enabling data exchange between devices such as door controls and air conditioning systems. It is standardized by the IEC under IEC 61375-2-3 and is not related to the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP).
ISO/IEC 14908-4 defines how to tunnel Control Network Protocol (CNP) over IP networks. It encapsulates protocols like EIA-709, EIA-600, and CNP, making it a versatile solution for building automation and control systems.
