We already performed exactly these lookups in the generic code to
populate `flow->guessed_protocol_id_by_ip`: use it!
This code probably needs a deeper review, since it is basicaly a simple
matching on ip + port.
These flows are classifed as `LINE_CALL`; another option was
`RTP/LINE_CALL`. No sure about the best solution...
Extend LINE domains list.
Remove RTP dead code.
Basically:
* "classification by-ip" (i.e. `flow->guessed_protocol_id_by_ip` is
NEVER returned in the protocol stack (i.e.
`flow->detected_protocol_stack[]`);
* if the application is interested into such information, it can access
`ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip` itself.
There are mainly 4 points in the code that set the "classification
by-ip" in the protocol stack: the generic `ndpi_set_detected_protocol()`/
`ndpi_detection_giveup()` functions and the HTTP/STUN dissectors.
In the unit tests output, a print about `ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip`
has been added for each flow: the huge diff of this commit is mainly due
to that.
Strictly speaking, this change is NOT an API/ABI breakage, but there are
important differences in the classification results. For examples:
* TLS flows without the initial handshake (or without a matching
SNI/certificate) are simply classified as `TLS`;
* similar for HTTP or QUIC flows;
* DNS flows without a matching request domain are simply classified as
`DNS`; we don't have `DNS/Google` anymore just because the server is
8.8.8.8 (that was an outrageous behaviour...);
* flows previusoly classified only "by-ip" are now classified as
`NDPI_PROTOCOL_UNKNOWN`.
See #1425 for other examples of why adding the "classification by-ip" in
the protocol stack is a bad idea.
Please, note that IPV6 is not supported :( (long standing issue in nDPI) i.e.
`ndpi_protocol->protocol_by_ip` wil be always `NDPI_PROTOCOL_UNKNOWN` for
IPv6 flows.
Define `NDPI_CONFIDENCE_MATCH_BY_IP` has been removed.
Close#1687
The host automa is used for two tasks:
* protocol sub-classification (obviously);
* DGA evaluation: the idea is that if a domain is present in this
automa, it can't be a DGA, regardless of its format/name.
In most dissectors both checks are executed, i.e. the code is something
like:
```
ndpi_match_host_subprotocol(..., flow->host_server_name, ...);
ndpi_check_dga_name(..., flow->host_server_name,...);
```
In that common case, we can perform only one automa lookup: if we check the
sub-classification before the DGA, we can avoid the second lookup in
the DGA function itself.
