* feat: s01-s14 docs quality overhaul — tool pipeline, single-agent, knowledge & resilience Rewrite code.py and README (zh/en/ja) for s01-s14, each chapter building incrementally on the previous. Key fixes across chapters: - s01-s04: agent loop, tool dispatch, permission pipeline, hooks - s05-s08: todo write, subagent, skill loading, context compact - s09-s11: memory system, system prompt assembly, error recovery - s12-s14: task graph, background tasks, cron scheduler All chapters CC source-verified. Code inherits fixes forward (PROMPT_SECTIONS, json.dumps cache, real-state context, can_start dep protection, etc.). * feat: s15-s19 docs quality overhaul — multi-agent platform: teams, protocols, autonomy, worktree, MCP tools Rewrite code.py and README (zh/en/ja) for s15-s19, the multi-agent platform chapters. Each chapter inherits all previous fixes and adds one mechanism: - s15: agent teams (TeamCreate, teammate threads, shared task list) - s16: team protocols (plan approval, shutdown handshake, consume_inbox) - s17: autonomous agents (idle polling, auto-claim, consume_lead_inbox) - s18: worktree isolation (git worktree, bind_task, cwd switching, safety) - s19: MCP tools (MCPClient, normalize_mcp_name, assemble_tool_pool, no cache) All appendix source code references verified against CC source. Config priority corrected: claude.ai < plugin < user < project < local. * fix: 5 regressions across s05-s19 — glob safety, todo validation, memory extraction, protocol types, dep crash - s05-s09: glob results now filter with is_relative_to(WORKDIR) (inherited from s02) - s06-s08: todo_write validates content/status required fields (inherited from s05) - s09: extract_memories uses pre-compression snapshot instead of compacted messages - s16: submit_plan docstring clarifies protocol-only (not code-level gate) - s17-s19: match_response restores type mismatch validation (from s16) - s17-s19: claim_task deps list handles missing dep files without crashing * fix: s12 Todo V2 logic reversal, s14/s15 cron range validation, s18/s19 worktree name validation - s12 README (zh/en/ja): fix Todo V2 direction — interactive defaults to Task, non-interactive/SDK defaults to TodoWrite. Fix env var name to CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TASKS (not TODO_V2). - s14/s15: add _validate_cron_field with per-field range checks (minute 0-59, hour 0-23, dom 1-31, month 1-12, dow 0-6), step > 0, range lo <= hi. Replace old try/except validation that only caught exceptions. - s18/s19: add validate_worktree_name() to remove_worktree and keep_worktree, not just create_worktree. * fix: align s16-s19 teaching tool consistency * fix pr265 chapter diagrams * Add comprehensive s20 harness chapter * Fix chapter smoke test regressions * Clarify README tutorial track transition --------- Co-authored-by: Haoran <bill-billion@outlook.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| images | ||
| code.py | ||
| README.en.md | ||
| README.ja.md | ||
| README.md | ||
s15: Agent Teams — One Agent Isn't Enough, Form a Team
s01 → ... → s13 → s14 → s15 → s16 → s17 → s18 → s19 → s20
"One agent isn't enough, form a team" — File-based inboxes + teammate threads.
Harness Layer: Teams — Multi-agent collaboration, message bus.
The Problem
"Refactor the entire backend" touches auth, database layer, API routes, and tests. One agent working on API routes no longer has auth module details in context. The context window is limited, a single agent can't cover every module.
s06's sub-agents are temps, called in for one job, then gone. Some tasks need teammates that can communicate and collaborate.
The Solution
Teaching code carries forward S14's capabilities (prompt assembly, task system, background execution, cron scheduling). To stay focused on the team mechanism, it omits full error recovery, memory, and skill systems. Added: MessageBus (file-based inboxes), spawn_teammate_thread (launch teammate threads), inbox injection (Lead receives teammate messages and injects into history).
Sub-agent vs Teammate:
| s06 Sub-agent | s15 Teammate | |
|---|---|---|
| Lifetime | One-shot, destroyed after use | Multi-turn (teaching: 10 rounds; real CC: idle loop) |
| Communication | Only returns conclusion | Async inbox, communicate anytime |
| Context | Fully isolated | Shared via messages |
| Count | One lead + occasional sub-agent | One Lead + multiple teammates |
How It Works
MessageBus: File-Based Inboxes
Each agent (including Lead and teammates) has a .jsonl inbox. Send = append a JSON line to the target's file. Read = read file + delete (consumption):
class MessageBus:
def send(self, from_agent: str, to_agent: str,
content: str, msg_type: str = "message"):
msg = {"from": from_agent, "to": to_agent,
"content": content, "type": msg_type,
"ts": time.time()}
inbox = MAILBOX_DIR / f"{to_agent}.jsonl"
with open(inbox, "a") as f:
f.write(json.dumps(msg) + "\n")
def read_inbox(self, agent: str) -> list[dict]:
inbox = MAILBOX_DIR / f"{agent}.jsonl"
if not inbox.exists():
return []
msgs = [json.loads(line) for line in inbox.read_text().splitlines()]
inbox.unlink() # consume: read + delete
return msgs
Why files instead of in-memory queues? Teaching code uses files because they're intuitive and observable across threads. Real CC also uses file inboxes (~/.claude/teams/{team}/inboxes/) but adds proper-lockfile for concurrent write safety. The teaching version's read_inbox has a read + unlink race, concurrent reads could lose messages, acceptable for teaching purposes.
spawn_teammate_thread: Launching a Teammate
Lead calls the spawn_teammate tool to start a teammate. The teammate runs in its own daemon thread with its own system prompt, messages, and simplified tool set:
def spawn_teammate_thread(name: str, role: str, prompt: str) -> str:
system = f"You are '{name}', a {role}. Use tools to complete tasks."
def run():
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
sub_tools = [bash, read_file, write_file, send_message]
for _ in range(10): # max 10 rounds
inbox = BUS.read_inbox(name)
if inbox:
messages.append({"role": "user",
"content": f"<inbox>{json.dumps(inbox)}</inbox>"})
response = client.messages.create(
model=MODEL, system=system, messages=messages[-20:],
tools=sub_tools, max_tokens=8000)
# ... execute tools, process results
# Send final summary to Lead
BUS.send(name, "lead", summary, "result")
threading.Thread(target=run, daemon=True).start()
Key design:
- Simplified tool set: bash, read, write, send_message. Teaching code omits tasks and cron to focus on communication. Real CC teammates also have TaskCreate, TaskUpdate, etc., the task system is shared across the team
- Teaching: 10 rounds max: prevents infinite loops. Real CC uses idle loop: after each round, send
idle_notification, wait for inbox messages, resume on arrival, exit only onshutdown_request - Auto-report on completion:
BUS.send(name, "lead", summary)sends the final result to Lead's inbox
Lead's Inbox Injection
Lead checks inbox after each main loop iteration. Teammate messages are injected into history so the LLM can see and react to them:
# After main loop iteration
inbox = BUS.read_inbox("lead")
if inbox:
inbox_text = "\n".join(
f"From {m['from']}: {m['content'][:200]}" for m in inbox)
history.append({"role": "user",
"content": f"[Inbox]\n{inbox_text}"})
Teaching code injects in the user input loop. Real CC is more refined, Lead's useInboxPoller checks every 1 second, submitting messages as new turns without waiting for user input.
Permission Bubbling
Teaching code omits permission bubbling. Real CC's flow (permissionSync.ts, useSwarmPermissionPoller.ts):
- Teammate encounters an operation needing approval → sends
permission_requestto Lead's inbox - Lead's
useInboxPollerdetects the request → routes to approval queue - User approves → Lead sends
permission_responseback to teammate - Teammate's
useSwarmPermissionPoller(polls every 500ms) receives reply → continue or reject
Putting It Together
1. Lead: "Build the backend: one agent isn't enough, form a team"
2. Lead → spawn_teammate("alice", "backend dev", "Create database schema")
3. Lead → spawn_teammate("bob", "frontend dev", "Write API client")
4. Alice thread starts → her own LLM call → bash "python manage.py migrate"
5. Bob thread starts → his own LLM call → write_file("client.ts", ...)
6. Alice done → BUS.send("alice", "lead", "Schema done: users, orders tables")
7. Bob done → BUS.send("bob", "lead", "Client written with types")
8. Lead next iteration → inbox injected into history → LLM sees both results
Two teammates work in parallel.
Changes from s14
| Component | Before (s14) | After (s15) |
|---|---|---|
| Agent count | 1 | 1 Lead + N teammate threads |
| Communication | None | MessageBus + .mailboxes/*.jsonl |
| New classes | — | MessageBus, active_teammates dict |
| New functions | — | spawn_teammate_thread, run_send_message, run_check_inbox |
| Lead tools | 11 (s14) | + spawn_teammate, send_message, check_inbox (14) |
| Teammate tools | — | bash, read_file, write_file, send_message (4) |
| Permissions | Local decisions | Teaching code omits (real CC has bubbling) |
Try It
cd learn-claude-code
python s15_agent_teams/code.py
Try these prompts:
Spawn alice as a backend developer. Ask her to create a file called schema.sql with a users table.Check your inbox for alice's result.Spawn bob as a tester. Ask him to check if schema.sql exists and list its contents.
What to observe: How does Lead spawn teammates? What do the .mailboxes/ JSONL files look like? After teammates finish, is Lead's inbox injected into history?
What's Next
Teammates can work and communicate. But if Lead wants Alice to shut down, killing the thread outright could leave half-written files. A graceful shutdown protocol is needed: Lead sends shutdown_request, teammate wraps up and exits.
s16 Team Protocols → Shutdown handshake and message conventions.
Deep Dive into CC Source
The following is a complete analysis based on CC source code
spawnMultiAgent.ts,useInboxPoller.ts(969 lines),useSwarmPermissionPoller.ts(330 lines),teammateMailbox.ts,teamHelpers.ts.
1. No Central Message Bus, It's the Filesystem
Teaching code uses a MessageBus class to send and receive messages. Real CC is more direct, each agent writes directly to other agents' inbox files.
Inbox path: ~/.claude/teams/{teamName}/inboxes/{agentName}.json
Writes use proper-lockfile for concurrent write safety (up to 10 retries). Each file is a JSON array; appending reads → appends → writes back.
2. 15 Message Types
CC team communication has 15 structured message types (teammateMailbox.ts):
| Type | Direction | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
plain text |
Both ways | Normal inter-teammate communication |
idle_notification |
Teammate→Lead | Teammate finished a turn, now idle |
permission_request |
Teammate→Lead | Teammate needs operation approval |
permission_response |
Lead→Teammate | Lead's approval result |
plan_approval_request |
Teammate→Lead | Teammate submits plan for review |
plan_approval_response |
Lead→Teammate | Lead's plan review |
shutdown_request |
Lead→Teammate | Request graceful shutdown |
shutdown_approved |
Teammate→Lead | Confirm shutdown |
shutdown_rejected |
Teammate→Lead | Reject shutdown (with reason) |
task_assignment |
Lead→Teammate | Assign a task |
team_permission_update |
Lead→Teammate | Broadcast permission changes |
mode_set_request |
Lead→Teammate | Change teammate's permission mode |
sandbox_permission_* |
Both ways | Network permission request/reply |
teammate_terminated |
System | Teammate removed notification |
Text messages are wrapped in <teammate-message> XML tags for delivery to the model.
3. Permission Bubbling: Bidirectional Polling
Teaching code omits permission bubbling. Real CC's flow (permissionSync.ts):
- Teammate encounters operation needing approval → sends
permission_requestto Lead's inbox - Lead's
useInboxPoller(polls every 1s) detects request → routes toToolUseConfirmQueue - Lead's UI shows approval dialog with teammate name and color
- User approves → Lead sends
permission_responseback to teammate's inbox - Teammate's
useSwarmPermissionPoller(polls every 500ms) receives reply → continue or reject
4. Teammate Lifecycle
CC teammates are created by spawnTeammate() (spawnMultiAgent.ts):
- Spawn: Create tmux pane (or in-process), assign color, write team config
- Work:
useInboxPollerchecks inbox every 1s → submit as new turn when messages arrive - Idle: Stop hook fires → send
idle_notificationto Lead - Shutdown: Lead sends
shutdown_request→ teammate repliesshutdown_approved→ Lead cleans up
5. Team Config
Team registry at ~/.claude/teams/{teamName}/config.json (teamHelpers.ts):
{
"name": "my-team",
"leadAgentId": "lead@my-team",
"members": [{
"agentId": "researcher@my-team",
"name": "researcher",
"agentType": "general-purpose",
"color": "blue",
"isActive": true
}]
}
Teammates cannot be nested (AgentTool.tsx:273 explicitly forbids "teammates spawning other teammates").