learn-claude-code/s05_todo_write
2026-08-15 00:03:45 +08:00
..
example Follow up PR #265: refine chapters, diagrams, and add S20 (#283) 2026-05-20 21:45:38 +08:00
images Fix empty tool-use response handling 2026-08-15 00:03:45 +08:00
code.py Fix empty tool-use response handling 2026-08-15 00:03:45 +08:00
README.ja.md refactor: streamline the course to 17 lessons 2026-08-12 03:02:42 +08:00
README.md refactor: streamline the course to 17 lessons 2026-08-12 03:02:42 +08:00
README.zh.md refactor: streamline the course to 17 lessons 2026-08-12 03:02:42 +08:00

s05: TodoWrite — An Agent Without a Plan Drifts Off Course

English · 中文 · 日本語

s01 → s02 → s03 → s04 → s05s06 → s07 → ... → s16 → s17

"An agent without a plan goes wherever the wind blows" — List the steps first, then execute. Complex tasks are less likely to miss steps.

Harness Layer: Planning — Let the Agent think before it acts.


The Problem

Give the Agent a complex task: "Rename all Python files to snake_case, run tests, and fix failures."

The Agent starts working, renames 3 files, runs a test, finds 2 failures, starts fixing. While fixing, it forgets the original goal was "rename to snake_case", the test failures have consumed all its attention.

The longer the conversation, the worse it gets: tool results keep filling the context, diluting the system prompt's influence. A 10-step refactoring: after steps 1-3, the Agent starts improvising because steps 4-10 have been pushed out of its attention.


The Solution

Todo Overview

S05 keeps the tool dispatch, permissions, and hooks from S04, then adds todo_write and a reminder counter. todo_write only updates planning state; the existing tools still perform the work.

The new tool uses the same TOOL_HANDLERS[block.name] dispatch path. After three consecutive tool-use rounds without todo_write, the harness adds a reminder to that round's tool results.


How It Works

TodoManager owns the in-memory list, validates updates, and renders the state returned to the model. run_todo_write also prints that state in the terminal:

class TodoManager:
    def __init__(self):
        self.items = []

    def update(self, todos: list | str) -> str:
        # Parse and validate before replacing the current list.
        validated = []
        ...
        self.items = validated
        return self.render()

    def render(self) -> str:
        # [ ] pending, [>] in progress, [x] completed
        ...


TODO = TodoManager()

def run_todo_write(todos: list | str) -> str:
    output = TODO.update(todos)
    print(output)
    return output

An update may contain at most 20 items, each item needs non-empty content, and only one item may be in_progress. The string input path accepts JSON or a Python list representation without using eval.

The tool definition joins the other 5 in the dispatch map:

TOOLS = [
    {"name": "bash",       ...},
    {"name": "read_file",  ...},
    {"name": "write_file", ...},
    {"name": "edit_file",  ...},
    {"name": "glob",       ...},
    # s05: new entry
    {"name": "todo_write", "description": "Create and manage a task list ...",
     "input_schema": {
         "type": "object",
         "properties": {
             "todos": {
                 "type": "array",
                 "items": {
                     "type": "object",
                     "properties": {
                         "content": {"type": "string"},
                         "status": {"type": "string", "enum": ["pending", "in_progress", "completed"]},
                     },
                 },
             },
         },
     },
    },
]

TOOL_HANDLERS["todo_write"] = run_todo_write

Reminder: after three tool-use rounds without todo_write, the reminder is appended to the third round's results and the counter resets:

rounds_since_todo = 0 if used_todo else rounds_since_todo + 1
if rounds_since_todo >= 3:
    results.append({
        "type": "text",
        "text": "<reminder>Update your todos.</reminder>",
    })
    rounds_since_todo = 0

Typical flow when the Agent receives a task: first call todo_write to list all steps (all pending) → pick one step, set it to in_progress → complete it, set to completed → look at the next pending → continue.

Key insight: todo_write doesn't give the Agent any additional execution capability. What it adds is planning capability.


Changes from s04

Component Before (s04) After (s05)
Tool count 5 (bash, read, write, edit, glob) 6 (+todo_write)
Planning None Stateful TODO list + reminder
SYSTEM prompt Generic prompt Added "plan before executing" guidance
Loop Tool dispatch and hooks Same dispatch path, plus rounds_since_todo and reminder injection

Try It

cd learn-claude-code
python s05_todo_write/code.py

Try these prompts:

  1. Refactor s05_todo_write/example/hello.py: add type hints, docstrings, and a main guard (should list 3 steps first, then execute)
  2. Create a Python package under s05_todo_write/example/demo_pkg with __init__.py, utils.py, and tests/test_utils.py
  3. Review Python files under s05_todo_write/example and fix any style issues

What to watch for: Was the first tool call todo_write? How many TODO steps were listed? Did statuses move from pending to in_progress / completed during execution?


What's Next

The Agent can plan now. But if a task is too large, say "refactor the entire auth module", a TODO list alone isn't enough. That task is itself a collection of dozens of subtasks that would drown in a single conversation's context.

→ s06 Subagent: Break large tasks into subtasks, each handled by an independent Agent with its own clean context, no cross-contamination.