|
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| dcgm-custom-metrics.yaml | ||
| nvidia-driver-compat.yaml | ||
| README.md | ||
| values-native-talos.yaml | ||
GPU operator — native pod workload on Talos (reference)
The files in this directory are not templates. They are reference
artifacts that document one working configuration for running GPU
workloads directly in pods on a Talos-based Cozystack cluster, together
with the DCGM metrics needed by the gpu/gpu-performance Grafana
dashboard.
The out-of-the-box values-talos.yaml for this package targets the
sandbox (VFIO passthrough to KubeVirt VMs) scenario. The files here
illustrate an alternative — running CUDA workloads in regular pods with
the NVIDIA device plugin — and the workarounds it currently requires on
Talos.
Files
values-native-talos.yaml— CozystackPackagevalues that disable sandbox workloads, enable the device plugin, pointhostPaths.driverInstallDirat the staging location used by the compat DaemonSet, and wire DCGM to the custom metrics ConfigMap.dcgm-custom-metrics.yaml—ConfigMapwith a DCGM metrics CSV that adds profiling, ECC, throttling and energy counters on top of the upstream defaults. The CSV is a superset needed for full coverage of thegpu/gpu-performancedashboard. Which parts are actually required depends on which dashboards you ship — see the table below.nvidia-driver-compat.yaml— DaemonSet that stageslibnvidia-ml.so.1andnvidia-smifrom the Talos glibc tree into a path where the NVIDIA GPU Operator validator expects them. See the "Why the compat DaemonSet exists" section below.
Why these are reference, not templates
Shipping these as first-class templates would silently impose assumptions that do not hold for every user:
- Whether the NVIDIA Talos system extension is installed on the nodes.
- Whether GPUs are exposed directly to pods or passed through to VMs.
- The exact path the installed driver ends up at (depends on the extension version and Talos release).
The sandbox-oriented values-talos.yaml remains the default. Operators
who want native pod GPU workloads can start from this directory and
adapt as needed.
Why the compat DaemonSet exists
The NVIDIA GPU Operator validator checks for libnvidia-ml.so.1 and
bin/nvidia-smi in the path given by hostPaths.driverInstallDir.
Talos installs them under /usr/local/glibc/usr/lib/ and
/usr/local/bin/, which the validator does not look at. Until upstream
addresses NVIDIA/gpu-operator#1687, the DaemonSet copies those
files into a directory the validator does inspect and creates the
.driver-ctr-ready flag file so the validator proceeds.
The compat DaemonSet runs privileged and bind-mounts host paths, so
the target namespace must allow privileged pods. On clusters that
enforce the Kubernetes Pod Security Standards at baseline or
restricted, label the namespace with
pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce: privileged (and the matching
audit/warn labels if the admission webhook is configured to
surface violations) before applying the manifest.
Dashboards and what DCGM metrics they need
Five GPU dashboards live under gpu/* in
packages/system/monitoring/dashboards-infra.list. All of them share
packages/system/monitoring-agents/alerts/gpu-recording.rules.yaml as
their source of aggregated series. The recording rules are safe to
ship on any cluster — they evaluate to empty series when DCGM is not
scraped, or when optional counters are missing.
What each dashboard needs on top of the upstream DCGM Exporter
default-counters.csv:
| Dashboard | Scope | Needs beyond defaults |
|---|---|---|
gpu-performance |
Per-node, per-GPU deep dive | DCGM_FI_DEV_POWER_VIOLATION, DCGM_FI_DEV_THERMAL_VIOLATION |
gpu-efficiency |
Per-workload util vs tensor active | DCGM_FI_DEV_POWER_VIOLATION, DCGM_FI_DEV_THERMAL_VIOLATION (via gpu:*_throttle_fraction:rate5m recording rules) |
gpu-fleet |
Cluster-wide admin inventory | DCGM_FI_DEV_POWER_MGMT_LIMIT (for the TDP vs draw panel) |
gpu-quotas |
Kube-quota vs live usage | kube_pod_container_resource_requests, kube_pod_status_phase, kube_node_status_allocatable (via namespace:gpu_count:allocated / cluster:gpu_count:* recording rules) |
gpu-tenants |
Per-namespace tenant view | nothing (works on default counters) |
DCGM_FI_PROF_PIPE_TENSOR_ACTIVE and DCGM_FI_PROF_GR_ENGINE_ACTIVE
are already in the upstream default set for the pinned DCGM Exporter
version, so the tensor-saturation and engine-active panels work without
any CSV override. The three counters listed in the table — throttling
violations and the power management limit — are the only extras the
tracked dashboards need. The recording rules in
gpu-recording.rules.yaml consume utilization, FB used, power,
temperature and the tensor-active profiling counter from the default
set, plus DCGM_FI_DEV_POWER_VIOLATION and
DCGM_FI_DEV_THERMAL_VIOLATION — used by the
gpu.recording.efficiency.1m group to derive the
gpu:power_throttle_fraction:rate5m and
gpu:thermal_throttle_fraction:rate5m series consumed by the
throttling panels on the efficiency and fleet dashboards.
The gpu.recording.throttle.validation.5m group additionally ships the
GPUThrottleFractionOverOne alert (severity warning) as a regression
detector: it fires when either throttle-fraction series exceeds 1.0,
which would indicate that DCGM changed the scale/divisor of the
underlying violation counters and the recording rules need to be
re-derived.
Verification status
The minimum-CSV claims above are verified by
hack/check-gpu-recording-rules.bats, which cross-checks every
DCGM_FI_* reference in the tracked GPU dashboards and recording rules
against the union of the upstream default set (snapshotted at
hack/dcgm-default-counters.csv for the pinned DCGM Exporter version)
and the custom CSV in dcgm-custom-metrics.yaml. When the DCGM
Exporter image in packages/system/gpu-operator/charts/gpu-operator/values.yaml
is bumped, refresh the snapshot from the matching tag of the
NVIDIA/dcgm-exporter repository and rerun the test.