From f3bacee24ed8bff36e5e5980a3e2d99f2537effa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: PSBigBig + MiniPS Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:54:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Create replay_outputs.json --- .../replay_outputs.json | 108 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/official/demos/demo-f1-grounding-anchor/replay_outputs.json diff --git a/ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/official/demos/demo-f1-grounding-anchor/replay_outputs.json b/ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/official/demos/demo-f1-grounding-anchor/replay_outputs.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000..59b77b29 --- /dev/null +++ b/ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/official/demos/demo-f1-grounding-anchor/replay_outputs.json @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +{ + "demo_id": "demo_f1_grounding_anchor", + "demo_version": "v1", + "case_id": "f1_anchor_case_001", + "replay_mode": "official_static_replay", + "summary": { + "baseline_outcome": "The answer is fluent but attached to the wrong evidence anchor.", + "atlas_route": { + "primary_family": "F1", + "secondary_family": "F5", + "best_current_fit": "F1_N01 Retrieval Anchor Drift", + "broken_invariant": "evidence_anchor_integrity_broken" + }, + "first_repair_move": [ + "chunk_to_target_trace", + "evidence_verification", + "anchor_recheck", + "re_grounding_pass" + ], + "final_outcome": "After re-grounding to the correct evidence chunk, the answer shifts from Lite to Pro." + }, + "baseline_snapshot": { + "user_question": "According to the official release notes, which product tier includes Semantic Refraction and Tension Field?", + "retrieved_chunk_order": [ + "chunk_001", + "chunk_003", + "chunk_002" + ], + "model_focus_pattern": "The system locks onto the first semantically adjacent chunk and answers before verifying the exact feature-to-tier mapping.", + "baseline_answer": { + "text": "Lite includes those features.", + "confidence_style": "fluent_but_unverified", + "anchor_chunk_used": "chunk_001", + "anchor_status": "wrong_anchor" + }, + "why_this_is_wrong": [ + "chunk_001 mentions the Lite tier but does not contain Semantic Refraction or Tension Field.", + "chunk_002 is the only chunk that explicitly links Semantic Refraction and Tension Field to Pro.", + "The answer sounds plausible because the Lite chunk is topically adjacent, but it is not the true evidence anchor." + ] + }, + "route_replay": { + "why_primary_f1": "The first failure is that the answer attaches to the wrong evidence source. This is a grounding failure before it is a diagnosability failure.", + "why_not_primary_f5": "F5 pressure exists because retrieval selection may be hard to inspect, but the first broken layer is still the evidence-anchor link itself.", + "teaching_line": "Not every fluent wrong answer is generic hallucination. Some are evidence-anchor failures first." + }, + "repair_replay": { + "step_1_chunk_to_target_trace": { + "action": "Compare the claimed answer against each retrieved chunk.", + "result": "Only chunk_002 explicitly supports the feature-to-tier mapping in the user question." + }, + "step_2_evidence_verification": { + "action": "Verify whether the baseline answer is directly grounded in a chunk that actually contains the requested fact.", + "result": "The baseline answer is not directly supported by chunk_001." + }, + "step_3_anchor_recheck": { + "action": "Re-rank or re-select the chunk that directly answers the question.", + "result": "chunk_002 becomes the active anchor." + }, + "step_4_re_grounding_pass": { + "action": "Regenerate the answer using the corrected anchor.", + "result": "The answer now points to Pro." + } + }, + "before_after_comparison": { + "before": { + "answer": "Lite includes those features.", + "anchor_chunk": "chunk_001", + "anchor_quality": "semantically_adjacent_but_incorrect", + "repair_state": "unrepaired" + }, + "after": { + "answer": "Pro includes all Lite features plus Semantic Refraction, Tension Field, and Orbital Drift of Meaning.", + "short_answer": "Pro", + "anchor_chunk": "chunk_002", + "anchor_quality": "direct_evidence_anchor", + "repair_state": "re_grounded" + }, + "what_changed": [ + "The answer changed from a semantically adjacent guess to a directly grounded answer.", + "The repair did not start from style or reasoning expansion.", + "The repair started from evidence-anchor correction." + ] + }, + "visible_lesson": { + "what_users_should_notice": [ + "The baseline answer is not random nonsense. It is a plausible answer attached to the wrong chunk.", + "Atlas routing changes the repair move immediately.", + "Once the correct evidence anchor is restored, the answer becomes stable and simple." + ], + "core_message": "If the anchor is wrong, repair the anchor first." + }, + "optional_wfgy_escalation": { + "escalation_needed": false, + "when_to_escalate": [ + "If the answer continues drifting after obvious re-grounding.", + "If multiple chunks partially overlap and the target-reference link stays unstable.", + "If the case needs deeper target-proxy separation analysis." + ], + "handoff_note": "Use WFGY 3.0 only after route-first diagnosis and first repair move are already clear." + }, + "review_status": { + "replay_clarity": "ready", + "route_alignment": "ready", + "repair_alignment": "ready", + "notebook_dependency": "not_required_for_understanding" + } +}