Update persona-behavior-checks.md

This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig + MiniPS 2026-04-01 17:16:55 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 58252d1c67
commit d56974ebe6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -441,3 +441,142 @@ Here is a simple way to review a route after a run.
### Notes
<short honest explanation>
````
This is not the final universal standard.
It is just a clean practical review shape.
---
## 🌍 Why This Matters for Multilingual Work Too
These checks become even more important across languages.
A route may seem stable in one language and drift badly in another.
For example, it may become:
* more formal
* more soft
* more vague
* more over-polite
* less grounded
* less emotionally accurate
* more generic
That is why multilingual work should still return to behavior checks like:
* route recognizability
* grounding
* emotional shape
* reusability
* branch identity
Language changes do not erase the need for route inspection.
They make it more necessary.
---
## 🪓 Why This Connects to Blackfan Testing
This page is for cleaner behavior inspection.
Blackfan testing is a more aggressive pressure surface.
These two layers are related, but not identical.
A route may pass a basic behavior check and still fail under harsher hostile reading.
That is why this page should be used alongside, not instead of, later blackfan evaluation.
This page asks:
* what is the route doing
Blackfan testing asks:
* what breaks when the route is attacked
Both matter.
---
## ⚠️ What This Page Does Not Guarantee
These checks are useful, but they do not guarantee:
* perfect evaluation
* finished route maturity
* universal comparability
* automatic good judgment
* permanent route stability
* complete immunity to drift later
This page helps you see more clearly.
It does not remove the need for real judgment.
That is fine.
The goal is better inspection, not fake certainty.
---
## 🚀 Why This Page Matters
Avatar gets much stronger the moment users can do more than say:
* I like this output
* I do not like that output
A route becomes more real when users can say:
* it is drifting
* it is more generic now
* it is too polished
* the grounding got weaker
* the emotional shape is off
* this branch is actually worth keeping
* this variant does not deserve a name yet
That kind of language makes the whole system more legible.
And that is one of the main reasons this page matters.
---
## 🧭 Where To Go Next
### If you want the eval hub
Go to [📊 Eval Hub](./README.md)
### If you want multilingual status
Go to [🌍 Multilingual Status](./multilingual-status.md)
### If you want blackfan pressure testing
Go to [🪓 Blackfan Testing](./blackfan-testing.md)
### If you want the workflow path
Go to [🧭 Avatar Tuning Workflow](../docs/avatar-tuning-workflow.md)
### If you want the highlights map
Go to [✨ Highlights Index](../highlights/README.md)
---
## 🔗 Quick Links
* [🏠 Avatar Home](../README.md)
* [📊 Eval Hub](./README.md)
* [🌍 Multilingual Status](./multilingual-status.md)
* [🪓 Blackfan Testing](./blackfan-testing.md)
* [🧭 Avatar Tuning Workflow](../docs/avatar-tuning-workflow.md)
* [✨ Highlights Index](../highlights/README.md)
* [⬆️ Back to WFGY Root](../../README.md)