Rename README.md to RAG_Problems.md

This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig 2025-07-28 10:41:01 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent 6fc6b7f324
commit d3389ad881
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
# 🧠 WFGY Problem → Module → Solution Map (v0.1 · RAG Focus)
This page maps common reasoning and retrieval failures — especially in RAG pipelines — to their corresponding WFGY solutions.
WFGY is not a retrieval system.
It is a semantic reasoning engine that augments, replaces, or corrects what existing RAG stacks often fail to do.
---
## 🔍 RAG-Related Failures and WFGY Solutions
| Problem | WFGY Solution | Module(s) | Status | Notes |
|--------|----------------|-----------|--------|-------|
| [🔸 Hallucination from irrelevant chunks](./hallucination.md) | Semantic Boundary + ΔS monitoring | BBCR, BBMC | ✅ | System detects when input has low semantic match and activates fallback |
| [🔸 Retrieval returns correct chunk but reasoning fails](./retrieval-collapse.md) | Multi-path semantic logic | BBCR | ✅ | WFGY builds stable reasoning paths even from vague sources |
| [🔸 Long question-answer chains drift off-topic](./context-drift.md) | Semantic Tree memory + ΔS threshold | BBMC, Tree | ✅ | Semantic jump tracking records nodes, avoids context collapse |
| [🔸 System "bluffs" when it doesnt know](./bluffing.md) | Knowledge boundary map | BBCR, λ_observe | ✅ | WFGY detects unstable ΔS + λ_observe and requests clarification |
| [🔸 Embedding similarity ≠ semantic meaning](./embedding-vs-semantic.md) | Residual Minimization | BBMC, BBAM | ✅ | Matches logic anchor, not just vector cosine |
| [🔸 System doesn't know what it doesn't know](./unknown-boundary.md) | Knowledge boundary guard | BBCR, Tree | ✅ | Detects unmapped topics and requests clarification |
| 🔸 No traceability across user sessions | External semantic memory tree | Tree engine | ⚠️ | Manual export/import for now; persistent store upcoming |
| 🔸 Debugging why RAG failed = painful | Manual tree audit | All modules | ✅ | Tree view shows where logic drifted or ΔS spiked |
| 🔸 Chunk ingestion pipeline | — | — | 🛠 | Not yet implemented; user pastes chunk into node manually |
| 🔸 No LangChain compatibility yet | — | — | 🛠 | Adapter planned; WFGY can serve as pre/post-processing layer |
---
## ✅ What you can do now
Even without any retriever, WFGY lets you:
- Paste content manually and reason on it
- Test hallucination safety via ΔS / λ_observe
- Record and inspect logic paths via Tree
- Detect unknown zones before the model bluffs
This means: WFGY is a **RAG failsafe layer**, even without retrieval working.
---
## 🧪 Example Use: "My PDF bot keeps hallucinating answers"
> → Paste the question and chunk into WFGY
> → If ΔS is too high, itll pause or route to BBCR
> → You can inspect the logic trace and see where it went off
> → Youll know if its the chunks fault — or the reasoning engine
---
## 🔧 Next Steps (Roadmap)
- [ ] Vector chunking → semantic node auto-mapping
- [ ] LangChain & LlamaIndex adapters
- [ ] Auto-summarization of Tree for memory replay
- [ ] GUI explorer for Tree inspection
- [ ] Integration with BlotBlotBlot / Persona agents
---
For now, if you're a RAG user tired of hallucinations, TXT OS + WFGY gives you a stable, inspectable core to reason with.
Feel free to open an issue if your failure case isnt listed.