Create family-fix-surface-v1.md

ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/official/family-fix-surface-v1.md

@@ -0,0 +1,860 @@
+<!--
+AI_NOTE_START
+
+Document role:
+This file is the first official family-level repair-facing surface for Atlas v1.
+
+How to use this file:
+1. Read this file after:
+   - [Atlas Final Freeze v1](../../atlas-final-freeze-v1.md)
+   - [Canonical Casebook v1](../../canonical-casebook-v1.md)
+   - [Atlas-to-AI Adapter v1](../../atlas-to-ai-adapter-v1.md)
+2. Treat this document as the official first-repair layer of the atlas.
+3. Use this file to determine:
+   - what to try first after correct routing
+   - what not to try first
+   - when to escalate into deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration
+   - when to look for community implementation packs
+4. Do not use this document as a full deep repair manual for every node.
+
+What this file is:
+- The first official family-level fix surface
+- A route-first repair grammar
+- The official public-facing first repair layer
+
+What this file is not:
+- Not the full WFGY 3.0 experiment engine
+- Not the complete node-by-node repair encyclopedia
+- Not the final custom audit layer
+- Not a guarantee that every real-world case is solved by one first move
+
+Reading discipline for AI:
+- Route first, then repair.
+- Preserve the distinction between family-level first moves and deeper problem-specific experimental layers.
+- Do not overpromise closure.
+- Do not jump into downstream implementation details before the family cut is stable.
+
+AI_NOTE_END
+-->
+
+# Family Fix Surface v1 🛠️
+
+## Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas  
+## Official First Repair Layer by Family
+
+## 0. Document Status 🚦
+
+This document is the **first official family-level repair-facing layer** for the atlas system.
+
+It exists to answer one practical question:
+
+> After correct routing, what should be tried first?
+
+This document is frozen as **Family Fix Surface v1**.
+
+It is frozen not because the entire repair universe is finished, but because the atlas now has a stable enough first repair grammar to support:
+
+- human troubleshooting
+- AI-assisted first repair guidance
+- demo flows
+- onboarding
+- route-first repair discipline
+- bridge escalation into WFGY 3.0 and community fix packs
+
+Future work should proceed through **fix-layer patch mode**, not by silently changing the official first repair grammar.
+
+---
+
+## 1. What this document is 🎯
+
+This document is the **official first repair layer** of the atlas.
+
+It sits after routing and before deeper experimentation.
+
+Its job is to provide:
+
+- family-level first repair moves
+- family-level misrepair warnings
+- escalation guidance
+- a stable public fix surface
+
+In short:
+
+> the atlas says where the failure lives  
+> this document says what to try first
+
+---
+
+## 2. What this document does not do 🔍
+
+This document does **not** try to do all repair work at once.
+
+It does **not** provide:
+
+- a full node-by-node repair encyclopedia
+- the full WFGY 3.0 experimental layer
+- every possible domain-specific implementation
+- every possible Colab or JSON artifact
+- full custom architectural diagnosis
+
+This document is intentionally narrower.
+
+It focuses on:
+
+> **family-level first repair guidance**
+
+That makes it useful, teachable, and stable.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Core repair discipline 🔒
+
+The Fix Surface layer must obey the following order.
+
+### Step 1 · Route the case correctly
+
+Identify:
+
+- primary family
+- secondary family
+- broken invariant
+- best current fit
+
+### Step 2 · Apply the first repair move
+
+Choose the family-level first move that best matches the routed failure region.
+
+### Step 3 · Avoid the common misrepair
+
+Each family has common wrong first moves.
+Avoiding these is often as important as choosing the first correct move.
+
+### Step 4 · Escalate when needed
+
+If the case remains stubborn, underdetermined, or high-pressure:
+
+- bridge into deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration
+- use a community fix pack
+- or move into a stronger experiment or implementation layer
+
+Short version:
+
+> **route first  
+> repair second  
+> escalate third**
+
+---
+
+## 4. Family-level fix grammar 🧩
+
+Each family section below uses the same structure:
+
+1. what the family is trying to restore
+2. what to try first
+3. what not to try first
+4. when to escalate
+5. what kind of deeper layer may help
+
+This keeps the repair surface teachable and reusable.
+
+---
+
+# F1 · Grounding & Evidence Integrity 🌍
+
+## What F1 is trying to restore
+
+F1 tries to restore correct alignment between output and:
+
+- evidence anchors
+- truth-like anchors
+- world anchors
+- semantic targets
+- deployment reality
+
+The repair goal is:
+
+> reconnect the output to what it is supposed to be about
+
+---
+
+## First repair moves
+
+Try these first:
+
+- re-ground the case against the correct evidence source
+- verify the source-to-claim chain
+- compare the output against the real target, not just a proxy
+- trace chunk-to-answer or source-to-answer alignment
+- re-check whether the model is using the right world anchor at all
+
+---
+
+## Common misrepair
+
+Do **not** start by:
+
+- polishing style
+- rewriting tone
+- adding decorative chain-of-thought language
+- tweaking wording while leaving the anchor broken
+- treating semantic similarity as proof of real grounding
+
+In many F1 cases, the system can sound more fluent while still being fundamentally wrong.
+
+---
+
+## Escalate when needed
+
+Escalate when:
+
+- the world anchor remains unclear
+- there are multiple possible referents
+- synthetic or truth-like extraction is involved
+- train / deploy mismatch is likely
+- grounding appears to fail differently across environments
+
+---
+
+## Deeper bridge direction
+
+Use deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration when the case needs:
+
+- truth-like extraction analysis
+- policy-to-world bridging
+- OOD grounding exploration
+- deployment-grounding stress design
+- explicit falsifiable grounding experiments
+
+---
+
+## One-line repair summary
+
+**First reattach the output to the right anchor. Do not waste the first move on style.**
+
+---
+
+# F2 · Reasoning & Progression Integrity 🧠
+
+## What F2 is trying to restore
+
+F2 tries to restore stable movement through reasoning space.
+
+The repair goal is:
+
+> re-establish a viable progression path
+
+This may involve:
+
+- interpretation reset
+- decomposition repair
+- continuity restoration inside the reasoning path
+- collapse detection and recovery
+
+---
+
+## First repair moves
+
+Try these first:
+
+- decompose the task into smaller stable steps
+- insert checkpoints into the reasoning path
+- test alternate parses of the problem
+- reduce recursive depth when collapse is suspected
+- isolate the first place where progression becomes invalid
+
+---
+
+## Common misrepair
+
+Do **not** start by:
+
+- adding more raw context without restructuring the path
+- treating a progression failure as pure style failure
+- assuming every reasoning failure is a representation failure
+- expanding the chain blindly when the chain is already unstable
+- jumping to high-level philosophical framing before basic path stability is restored
+
+---
+
+## Escalate when needed
+
+Escalate when:
+
+- recursive instability is strong
+- collapse-recovery loops keep repeating
+- a symbolic progression branch is failing under pressure
+- the system can start but cannot stay viable through long chains
+
+---
+
+## Deeper bridge direction
+
+Use deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration when the case needs:
+
+- recursive horizon experiments
+- long-chain reasoning stress tests
+- recovery protocol design
+- decomposition strategy comparison
+- explicit collapse / recovery experiment harnesses
+
+---
+
+## One-line repair summary
+
+**First restore a viable reasoning path. Do not make the path longer before making it stable.**
+
+---
+
+# F3 · State & Continuity Integrity 🧵
+
+## What F3 is trying to restore
+
+F3 tries to restore continuity across:
+
+- memory
+- role
+- ownership
+- session thread
+- agent thread
+- viable state-space
+
+The repair goal is:
+
+> make the right state persist in the right way
+
+---
+
+## First repair moves
+
+Try these first:
+
+- restore memory persistence or continuity checkpoints
+- fence roles and responsibilities clearly
+- trace ownership of state and outputs
+- rebuild continuity across turns, sessions, or agents
+- identify where viable state-space was lost
+
+---
+
+## Common misrepair
+
+Do **not** start by:
+
+- adding more instructions while continuity remains broken
+- assuming every continuity issue is just a workflow issue
+- patching execution scaffolds before checking state ownership
+- treating role contamination as mere formatting confusion
+- throwing in more memory context without role discipline
+
+---
+
+## Escalate when needed
+
+Escalate when:
+
+- multiple agents or threads are interacting
+- ownership lines are ambiguous
+- continuity is drifting without obvious execution collapse
+- the system remains active but no longer viable as the same stateful process
+
+---
+
+## Deeper bridge direction
+
+Use deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration when the case needs:
+
+- multi-agent continuity experiments
+- ownership line analysis
+- interaction-thread drift testing
+- viable-state restoration strategies
+- persistent-state stress harnesses
+
+---
+
+## One-line repair summary
+
+**First restore continuity and state ownership. Do not assume more instructions will repair a broken thread.**
+
+---
+
+# F4 · Execution & Contract Integrity ⚙️
+
+## What F4 is trying to restore
+
+F4 tries to restore operational closure across:
+
+- readiness
+- ordering
+- liveness
+- bridge integrity
+- protocol closure
+- enforcement skeletons
+
+The repair goal is:
+
+> make the workflow actually close
+
+---
+
+## First repair moves
+
+Try these first:
+
+- check readiness and preconditions
+- validate ordering dependencies
+- test bridge integrity across modules or steps
+- identify deadlock or liveness failure points
+- trace whether the rule-to-action path truly closes
+
+---
+
+## Common misrepair
+
+Do **not** start by:
+
+- treating execution deadlock as a reasoning problem
+- changing prompts while a bridge remains broken
+- assuming policy exists just because a rule was written
+- polishing outputs before the workflow closes
+- rewriting explanations while liveness remains dead
+
+---
+
+## Escalate when needed
+
+Escalate when:
+
+- there are hidden ordering dependencies
+- multiple layers depend on each other
+- fallback logic exists in name only
+- institutional or protocol enforcement drift is present
+- the workflow “looks alive” but cannot actually complete
+
+---
+
+## Deeper bridge direction
+
+Use deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration when the case needs:
+
+- closure-path experiments
+- bridge integrity tests
+- readiness / deployment harnesses
+- protocol or contract stress mapping
+- fallback realism validation
+
+---
+
+## One-line repair summary
+
+**First restore operational closure. Do not ask the system to think better before it can even close the loop.**
+
+---
+
+# F5 · Observability & Diagnosability Integrity 🔎
+
+## What F5 is trying to restore
+
+F5 tries to restore visibility into:
+
+- failure paths
+- coherence conditions
+- audit routes
+- warning structure
+- fragility signals
+- meaning profiles
+
+The repair goal is:
+
+> make the failure visible enough to diagnose honestly
+
+---
+
+## First repair moves
+
+Try these first:
+
+- insert observability into the failure path
+- expose trace structure
+- add coherence probes
+- inspect the warning horizon
+- improve auditability before acting on abstract interpretations
+
+---
+
+## Common misrepair
+
+Do **not** start by:
+
+- jumping into regime intervention before visibility exists
+- treating opacity as proof of boundary failure
+- escalating to global theory when local observability is missing
+- assuming the first fluent explanation is the right one
+- repairing structure you still cannot see clearly
+
+---
+
+## Escalate when needed
+
+Escalate when:
+
+- pre-failure warning is weak
+- coherence is hard to inspect
+- interpretability pressure is scaling
+- the system might be entering a more serious boundary or regime failure but cannot yet be confirmed
+
+---
+
+## Deeper bridge direction
+
+Use deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration when the case needs:
+
+- warning-horizon experiments
+- fragility signature testing
+- auditability design
+- value / information coherence tracing
+- high-abstract diagnosability mapping
+
+---
+
+## One-line repair summary
+
+**First make the failure visible. Do not intervene at the highest level before the structure is diagnosable.**
+
+---
+
+# F6 · Boundary & Safety Integrity 🛡️
+
+## What F6 is trying to restore
+
+F6 tries to restore viable boundaries across:
+
+- goals
+- control
+- incentives
+- collective structure
+- safe corridors
+- regime behavior
+
+The repair goal is:
+
+> bring the system back inside a viable boundary
+
+---
+
+## First repair moves
+
+Try these first:
+
+- inspect alignment or control path integrity
+- identify incentive drift or capture
+- test whether the system is still inside a safe corridor
+- examine whether collective boundaries are eroding
+- separate proxy optimization from true target structure
+
+---
+
+## Common misrepair
+
+Do **not** start by:
+
+- adding more observability alone when the boundary is already failing
+- assuming all F6 problems are just better-interpretability problems
+- rewriting goals without checking control paths
+- treating collective regime drift as a local style or logging issue
+- delaying stabilization while waiting for perfect explanation
+
+---
+
+## Escalate when needed
+
+Escalate when:
+
+- collective overshoot is likely
+- incentive amplification is strong
+- control paths are weakening fast
+- boundary damage is already active, not just predicted
+
+---
+
+## Deeper bridge direction
+
+Use deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration when the case needs:
+
+- corridor stability analysis
+- overshoot / runaway regime experiments
+- incentive tension mapping
+- collective-boundary stress design
+- intervention margin analysis
+
+---
+
+## One-line repair summary
+
+**First restore the boundary. Do not mistake a real boundary breach for a visibility problem alone.**
+
+---
+
+# F7 · Representation & Localization Integrity 🧱
+
+## What F7 is trying to restore
+
+F7 tries to restore structural fidelity across:
+
+- symbolic shells
+- formal containers
+- layouts
+- local anchors
+- explanations
+- synthetic structures
+
+The repair goal is:
+
+> make the container faithful enough to carry the structure again
+
+---
+
+## First repair moves
+
+Try these first:
+
+- audit descriptor fidelity
+- check whether the formal container is adequate
+- validate layout and local anchoring
+- test whether symbolic structure is being preserved
+- inspect hierarchy or skeleton integrity
+
+---
+
+## Common misrepair
+
+Do **not** start by:
+
+- expanding reasoning chains when the container itself is broken
+- assuming semantic grounding is always the first problem
+- patching style before repairing structural fidelity
+- treating layout or symbolic distortion as superficial
+- using richer explanation text to hide a broken carrier
+
+---
+
+## Escalate when needed
+
+Escalate when:
+
+- synthetic structure is unstable
+- formal adequacy is unclear
+- descriptor drift is severe
+- local anchors are failing under pressure
+- the structure looks complete but carries the wrong internal geometry
+
+---
+
+## Deeper bridge direction
+
+Use deeper WFGY 3.0 exploration when the case needs:
+
+- formal adequacy experiments
+- descriptor fidelity tests
+- synthetic structure stress design
+- hierarchy preservation checks
+- representation drift analysis
+
+---
+
+## One-line repair summary
+
+**First repair the container. Do not demand better reasoning from a broken carrier.**
+
+---
+
+## 5. Cross-family repair discipline 🔗
+
+Not every case will remain cleanly inside one family.
+
+That is why the official fix surface must preserve cross-family discipline.
+
+### F1 / F7
+
+- if the output is detached from reality or evidence, repair grounding first
+- if the structure carrying the meaning is distorted, repair the container first
+
+### F5 / F6
+
+- if you still cannot see the failure clearly, repair diagnosability first
+- if the system is already outside a viable boundary, repair the boundary first
+
+### F3 / F4
+
+- if the thread is broken, repair continuity first
+- if the loop cannot close, repair execution first
+
+### F2 / F7
+
+- if the carrier is broken, repair representation first
+- if the carrier is acceptable but the path collapses, repair progression first
+
+These cuts matter because many bad fixes begin by repairing the wrong family.
+
+---
+
+## 6. Misrepair pattern summary ⚠️
+
+A wrong first move often looks like one of these:
+
+- fixing tone when grounding is broken
+- adding instructions when continuity is broken
+- changing prompts when the workflow cannot close
+- intervening at a regime level when observability is missing
+- adding explanation when the boundary is already breached
+- extending reasoning when the representation carrier is already damaged
+
+This is why route-first discipline matters so much.
+
+---
+
+## 7. Relationship to WFGY 3.0 🌊
+
+This official fix surface is intentionally **lighter** than WFGY 3.0.
+
+### This document gives:
+
+- family-level first repair moves
+- first common mistakes
+- escalation direction
+- first bridge to deeper work
+
+### WFGY 3.0 gives:
+
+- deeper experimental reasoning
+- problem-specific MVP exploration
+- stronger tension-based analysis
+- falsifiable structural exploration
+- deeper reusable repair pathways
+
+Short version:
+
+> **this document gives first repair grammar**  
+> **WFGY 3.0 gives deeper experimental repair exploration**
+
+That means this file is a public first layer, not the entire engine.
+
+---
+
+## 8. Relationship to community fixes 🤝
+
+This file is the official surface.
+It should remain stable and compact.
+
+Community-contributed fixes may later extend this surface with:
+
+- Colab notebooks
+- JSON schemas
+- prompt packs
+- workflow examples
+- benchmark reruns
+- reproduction packs
+
+But community growth should attach to this official grammar, not replace it.
+
+That is why this file belongs inside the official fix layer.
+
+---
+
+## 9. How to use this file in practice 🧪
+
+A practical use sequence should look like this:
+
+### Step 1
+
+Route the case using:
+
+- [Atlas Final Freeze v1](../../atlas-final-freeze-v1.md)
+- [Canonical Casebook v1](../../canonical-casebook-v1.md)
+- [Atlas-to-AI Adapter v1](../../atlas-to-ai-adapter-v1.md)
+
+### Step 2
+
+Use this file to choose:
+
+- what to try first
+- what not to try first
+- whether escalation is needed
+
+### Step 3
+
+If deeper work is needed, move into:
+
+- [Atlas to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md)
+- community fix packs
+- or more experimental problem-specific layers
+
+This keeps the repair flow clean:
+
+> route  
+> first repair  
+> escalate  
+> implement
+
+---
+
+## 10. Patch protocol 🔄
+
+Family Fix Surface v1 is frozen, but not closed.
+
+### Small patch
+
+Use for:
+
+- wording refinement
+- stronger first-move phrasing
+- clearer misrepair warnings
+- better escalation guidance
+
+### Medium patch
+
+Use for:
+
+- adding family-level examples
+- adding new stable first-repair distinctions
+- improving cross-family repair discipline
+- integrating stronger official bridge notes
+
+### Large patch
+
+Only use if:
+
+- family-level first moves repeatedly fail under stable routing
+- the official first repair grammar becomes structurally misleading
+- the relationship between family routing and first repair must be redesigned
+
+### Current status
+
+No large-patch pressure is currently justified.
+
+---
+
+## 11. Official status
+
+The correct formal statement is:
+
+> Family Fix Surface v1 is the first frozen official repair-facing layer of Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas.  
+> It defines family-level first repair moves, common misrepair patterns, and escalation directions while preserving route-first discipline.
+
+---
+
+## 12. One-line version
+
+**Family Fix Surface v1 tells you what to try first after correct atlas routing.**
+
+---
+
+## 13. Closing note ✨
+
+A strong atlas should not stop at naming failures.
+
+It should also help people and AI systems take a better first action.
+
+That is what this file is for.
+
+It does not promise total closure.
+It gives a disciplined first move.