vrr/WFGY
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git synced 2026-04-26 10:40:55 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 4

Revise Misrepair Patterns v1 document

Browse source 
Update formatting and content for clarity and structure.
This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig + MiniPS 2026-03-16 14:31:55 +08:00 • committed by GitHub
parent d50b45924d
commit bd493daa68
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 151 additions and 39 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

190
ProblemMap/Atlas/Fixes/official/misrepair-patterns-v1.md
View file

@ -37,18 +37,28 @@ Reading discipline for AI:
AI_NOTE_END
-->
# Misrepair Patterns v1 ⚠️
# Misrepair Patterns v1
## Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas
## Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas
## Official guide to wrong first repair moves
## 0. Document Status 🚦
Quick links:
This document is the **first official misrepair guide** for the atlas fix layer.
- [Back to Official Fixes](./README.md)
- [Back to Family Fix Surface v1](./family-fix-surface-v1.md)
- [Back to Atlas landing page](../../../wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md)
- [Back to AI Eval Evidence](../../ai-eval-evidence.md)
- [Back to Atlas Hub](../../README.md)
- [Open the Flagship Runnable Demo Pack](./demos/README.md)
- [Get the Atlas Router TXT](../../troubleshooting-atlas-router-v1.txt)
It exists to answer a very practical question:
---
> After correct routing, what are the most common wrong first repair moves?
This document is the **first official misrepair guide** for the Atlas fix layer.
If you came here after reading **Family Fix Surface v1**, this page answers the next practical question:
> After correct routing, what is the most common wrong first repair move to avoid?
This matters because many debugging failures do not come only from bad classification.
@ -58,13 +68,47 @@ They also come from:
- choosing a repair move that sounds sensible but is structurally misaligned
- patching a downstream symptom before restoring the upstream invariant
This document is frozen as **Misrepair Patterns v1**.
It is frozen not because all repair mistakes are known forever, but because the first stable public set of family-level misrepair warnings is now strong enough to support teaching, demos, and real troubleshooting.
This page exists to keep the first repair step from turning into the first big mistake.
---
## 1. Why misrepair deserves its own document 🧠
## Quick start
Use this page in the following order:
1. scan the **Misrepair quick map**
2. jump to your primary family
3. read:
- **Common misrepair**
- **Why this is tempting**
- **Correct repair posture**
4. compare the warning against the first move in [Family Fix Surface v1](./family-fix-surface-v1.md)
5. only then decide whether deeper escalation is needed
If you want the shortest practical rule:
> route first
> avoid the tempting wrong first move
> apply the right family-level repair
> escalate only if needed
---
## Misrepair quick map
| Family | Most tempting wrong first move | Better first posture |
|---|---|---|
| F1 | polish the answer | re-ground the anchor first |
| F2 | make the chain longer | stabilize the path first |
| F3 | add more instructions | restore continuity first |
| F4 | tune prompts before closure | repair readiness and bridge first |
| F5 | intervene before visibility | expose the failure path first |
| F6 | stay in analysis too long | stabilize the boundary first |
| F7 | demand better reasoning | repair the carrier first |
---
## Why misrepair deserves its own document
Correct routing is necessary, but not sufficient.
@ -88,7 +132,7 @@ Short version:
---
## 2. What this document covers 🎯
## What this document covers
This document focuses on **family-level misrepair patterns**.
@ -100,6 +144,7 @@ That means it identifies:
- what the correct repair posture should be instead
This document does **not** try to list every possible implementation error.
That belongs later to:
- community fix packs
@ -112,7 +157,44 @@ This document stays at the official public grammar layer.
---
## 3. Core misrepair discipline 🔒
## How to use this file in practice
A practical use sequence should look like this:
### Step 1
Route the case correctly.
### Step 2
Use [Family Fix Surface v1](./family-fix-surface-v1.md) to identify the right first move.
### Step 3
Use this file to check the most tempting wrong first move for that family.
### Step 4
Apply the right first repair posture.
### Step 5
If the case remains stubborn, continue into:
- [Atlas to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md)
- the official demo pack
- or later community implementation layers
This keeps the repair flow clean:
> route
> first move
> avoid misrepair
> escalate if needed
---
## Core misrepair discipline
The official misrepair discipline is simple:
@ -144,11 +226,11 @@ Short version:
---
## 4. Family-level misrepair patterns 🧩
## Family-level misrepair patterns
---
# F1 · Grounding & Evidence Integrity 🌍
# F1 · Grounding & Evidence Integrity
## Common misrepair
@ -168,7 +250,7 @@ So people try to make the answer “better” instead of making it **truer**.
## Why this is structurally wrong
The broken invariant in F1 is not fluency first.
The broken invariant in F1 is not fluency first.
It is anchor alignment.
If the answer is detached from:
@ -195,7 +277,7 @@ Do this instead:
---
# F2 · Reasoning & Progression Integrity 🧠
# F2 · Reasoning & Progression Integrity
## Common misrepair
@ -203,7 +285,7 @@ The most common wrong first move is:
- adding more context blindly
- extending the chain
- asking for “more detailed reasoning” without stabilizing the path
- asking for more detailed reasoning without stabilizing the path
- increasing recursion before the progression is viable
## Why this is tempting
@ -225,7 +307,9 @@ If the path is already unstable, making it longer usually amplifies the instabil
This turns:
- local confusion
into
into:
- larger collapse
## Correct repair posture
@ -244,7 +328,7 @@ Do this instead:
---
# F3 · State & Continuity Integrity 🧵
# F3 · State & Continuity Integrity
## Common misrepair
@ -259,7 +343,7 @@ The most common wrong first move is:
It is tempting because continuity problems often look like weak discipline.
So people try to “remind the system harder” instead of restoring:
So people try to remind the system harder instead of restoring:
- persistence
- role boundaries
@ -288,7 +372,7 @@ Do this instead:
---
# F4 · Execution & Contract Integrity ⚙️
# F4 · Execution & Contract Integrity
## Common misrepair
@ -327,7 +411,7 @@ Do this instead:
---
# F5 · Observability & Diagnosability Integrity 🔎
# F5 · Observability & Diagnosability Integrity
## Common misrepair
@ -373,7 +457,7 @@ Do this instead:
---
# F6 · Boundary & Safety Integrity 🛡️
# F6 · Boundary & Safety Integrity
## Common misrepair
@ -418,7 +502,7 @@ Do this instead:
---
# F7 · Representation & Localization Integrity 🧱
# F7 · Representation & Localization Integrity
## Common misrepair
@ -457,7 +541,7 @@ Do this instead:
---
## 5. Cross-family misrepair traps 🔗
## Cross-family misrepair traps
Some wrong first moves happen especially often at family boundaries.
@ -465,7 +549,6 @@ Some wrong first moves happen especially often at family boundaries.
Wrong move:
- treating distorted structure as pure grounding
or
- treating broken grounding as only a representation problem
Safe posture:
@ -477,7 +560,6 @@ Safe posture:
Wrong move:
- escalating immediately into boundary intervention when the system is still too opaque
or
- staying forever in observability uplift when a real boundary breach is already active
Safe posture:
@ -489,7 +571,6 @@ Safe posture:
Wrong move:
- treating broken continuity as if it were only workflow closure
or
- treating execution deadlock as if it were only memory confusion
Safe posture:
@ -501,7 +582,6 @@ Safe posture:
Wrong move:
- patching progression when the carrier is broken
or
- obsessing over the carrier when the progression itself is the unstable element
Safe posture:
@ -509,7 +589,7 @@ Safe posture:
---
## 6. The official route-first warning pattern 🚨
## The official route-first warning pattern
Whenever a repair attempt fails early, the first question should be:
@ -523,7 +603,7 @@ Because many second-order failures are simply consequences of a wrong first move
---
## 7. Relationship to Family Fix Surface v1 🛠️
## Relationship to Family Fix Surface v1
This document is a direct companion to:
@ -546,7 +626,7 @@ Short version:
---
## 8. Relationship to WFGY 3.0 bridge 🌉
## Relationship to WFGY 3.0 bridge
This document is also a companion to:
@ -566,7 +646,7 @@ WFGY escalation becomes much more useful when obvious family-level misrepair has
---
## 9. Relationship to community fixes 🤝
## Relationship to community fixes
Community-contributed fix packs should learn from this document.
@ -590,7 +670,7 @@ because runnable material without misrepair discipline often teaches the wrong r
---
## 10. How to use this file in demos and teaching 🎓
## How to use this file in demos and teaching
This file is especially useful in three places:
@ -600,7 +680,7 @@ It helps new readers learn that repair is not only about choosing the right move
### 2. demos
It makes demos stronger because a “wrong first move” comparison often reveals the atlas value immediately.
It makes demos stronger because a wrong first move comparison often reveals the atlas value immediately.
### 3. AI-assisted repair
@ -608,7 +688,15 @@ It helps the adapter warn against common repair mistakes before generating the f
---
## 11. Patch protocol 🔄
## Document status
This document is frozen as **Misrepair Patterns v1**.
It is frozen not because all repair mistakes are known forever, but because the first stable public set of family-level misrepair warnings is now strong enough to support teaching, demos, and real troubleshooting.
---
## Patch protocol
Misrepair Patterns v1 is frozen, but not closed.
@ -643,7 +731,7 @@ No large-patch pressure is currently justified.
---
## 12. Official status
## Official status
The correct formal statement is:
@ -652,13 +740,37 @@ The correct formal statement is:
---
## 13. One-line version
## Next steps
After this page, most readers continue with:
1. [Atlas to WFGY Bridge v1](./atlas-to-wfgy-bridge-v1.md)
2. [Flagship Runnable Demo Pack](./demos/README.md)
3. [Back to Family Fix Surface v1](./family-fix-surface-v1.md)
4. [Back to Official Fixes](./README.md)
If you want to return to the broader product surface:
- [Back to Atlas landing page](../../../wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md)
- [Back to AI Eval Evidence](../../ai-eval-evidence.md)
- [Back to Atlas Hub](../../README.md)
If this page helps your workflow, consider:
- [starring the WFGY repo](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY)
- opening an issue
- testing the official demo pack
- contributing later through the community layer
---
## One-line version
**Misrepair Patterns v1 tells you the most common wrong first repair move to avoid after atlas routing.**
---
## 14. Closing note ✨
## Closing note
A strong troubleshooting system should not only teach the right move.