vrr/WFGY
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git synced 2026-05-05 23:40:49 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 4

Update wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig + MiniPS 2026-03-11 22:44:48 +08:00 • committed by GitHub
parent 5ec455fe9e
commit b18a76f1ac
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 167 additions and 210 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

377
ProblemMap/wfgy-ai-problem-map-troubleshooting-atlas.md
View file

@ -56,52 +56,44 @@ AI_NOTE_START
Document role:
This page is the primary product-facing entry for Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas.
How to read this page:
1. Read this page first to understand the product-level idea.
How to use this page:
1. Read this page first to understand the product-level identity of the atlas.
2. Treat this page as the shortest stable public-facing overview.
3. Do not treat this page as the full internal ledger, patch log, or validation notebook.
4. For deeper structure, supporting documents, casebook, adapter, and patch notes, route to:
ProblemMap/Atlas/README.md
3. Use this page to understand what the atlas is, why it exists, how it should be used, and where to go next.
4. For deeper structure, teaching cases, AI adapter logic, patch notes, and bridge materials, route to:
[Atlas Hub](./Atlas/README.md)
What this page is:
- A product-facing overview
- A product-facing main page
- A routing grammar introduction
- A stable first-entry document for humans and AI systems
What this page is not:
- Not the full freeze document
- Not the full casebook
- Not the full adapter specification
- Not the full adapter spec
- Not the full patch history
- Not the internal validation ledger
Primary usage goal:
Help a human or AI quickly answer:
- What is Problem Map 3.0?
- Why is it different from a checklist?
- What are the seven families?
- How should this atlas be used?
- Why does it matter?
Reading discipline for AI:
- Preserve the distinction between family, node, subtree, overlay, casebook, adapter, and patch layers.
- Do not silently rewrite frozen terms.
- Do not overclaim universal closure.
- Treat this page as the public-facing mainline summary, not as the only source of truth.
- Treat this page as the public-facing mainline overview, not as the only source of truth.
AI_NOTE_END
-->
# Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas
# Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas 🧭
<img width="1536" height="1024" alt="ChatGPT Image 2026年3月10日 下午01_50_47" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d2235b19-cac9-46e6-a396-65ce40a203de" />
## A routing grammar for AI failures, system failures, and high-pressure diagnostic cases
## A routing grammar for failures, debugging, and high-pressure diagnostic cases
Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas is the next major evolution of the Problem Map line.
Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas is the first formal atlas release in the Problem Map line.
It is not just a checklist.
It is not just a naming table.
It is not just a checklist.
It is not just a naming table.
It is not just a collection of debugging tips.
It is a structured troubleshooting atlas built to help humans and AI systems do five things more reliably:
@ -110,44 +102,44 @@ It is a structured troubleshooting atlas built to help humans and AI systems do
2. identify which invariant is broken
3. separate neighboring failure regions that are easy to confuse
4. choose the right first repair direction
5. keep future debugging from collapsing into ad hoc guesswork
5. prevent future debugging from collapsing into ad hoc guesswork
In short:
> Problem Map 3.0 is a routing grammar for failures.
> **Problem Map 3.0 is a routing grammar for failures.**
---
## Why this exists
Modern AI systems do not usually fail in one clean way.
Modern AI systems do not fail in one clean way.
A failure may look like hallucination, but actually be grounding drift.
A failure may look like reasoning collapse, but actually begin with a broken symbolic container.
A failure may look like safety trouble, but actually begin with missing observability.
A failure may look like memory trouble, but actually come from execution closure or bridge failure.
A case may look like hallucination, but actually begin as grounding drift.
A case may look like reasoning collapse, but actually start with a broken formal container.
A case may look like safety trouble, but actually begin with missing observability.
A case may look like memory trouble, but actually come from execution closure or bridge failure.
This is why ordinary checklists become too shallow.
Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas was built to give a more stable way to cut these failure regions apart, so that diagnosis and first repair moves become more consistent.
Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas was built to cut these regions apart more cleanly, so diagnosis and first repair moves become more stable.
---
## Why “3.0”
## Why “3.0” matters
The name matters.
The name is intentional.
“Problem Map” stays because the system grows out of the earlier Problem Map line and preserves its original debugging spirit.
**Problem Map** stays because this system grows out of the earlier Problem Map line and keeps its original debugging spirit.
“3.0” matters because this is not a small cosmetic update.
**3.0** matters because this is not a small update.
It is a structural jump:
- from checklist logic to atlas logic
- from flat failure naming to routing grammar
- from isolated debugging tips to a reusable failure map
- from AI-only practical use toward a broader complex-system debugging framework
- from isolated debugging tips to reusable failure mapping
- from local AI debugging toward a broader complex-system bridge
“Troubleshooting Atlas” matters because this project is meant to feel like a map, not a loose article, and like an operating debugging surface, not a decorative theory piece.
**Troubleshooting Atlas** matters because this project is meant to feel like a map, not a loose article, and like an operating surface, not a decorative theory page.
---
@ -157,9 +149,9 @@ Most debugging material does one of three things:
- it names symptoms
- it lists best practices
- it gives local fixes
- it suggests local fixes
Problem Map 3.0 tries to do something more structural.
Problem Map 3.0 does something more structural.
It organizes failure space into a stable mother table, then teaches how to move through that table using:
@ -174,133 +166,94 @@ That is why this project is better understood as a routing grammar than a checkl
---
## The seven-family mother table
## The seven-family mother table 🧩
The current atlas is organized around seven top-level failure families.
The current atlas organizes failure space through seven top-level families.
### F1. Grounding & Evidence Integrity
### F1 · Grounding & Evidence Integrity
The system fails to stay aligned with external evidence, truth-like anchors, world anchors, or semantic targets.
The system fails to remain correctly aligned with external evidence anchors, truth-like anchors, world anchors, or semantic targets.
Short intuition:
the output is no longer properly tied to reality, evidence, or the intended target.
**Short intuition**
the output is no longer properly tied to reality, evidence, or the intended target
### F2. Reasoning & Progression Integrity
---
The reasoning chain, decomposition chain, recursive chain, or recovery chain loses continuity, controllability, or recoverability.
### F2 · Reasoning & Progression Integrity
Short intuition:
the system is no longer moving through reasoning space in a stable way.
The reasoning chain, decomposition chain, recursive chain, or recovery path loses continuity, controllability, or recoverability.
### F3. State & Continuity Integrity
**Short intuition**
the system is no longer moving through reasoning space in a stable way
Memory, role, ownership, session thread, or continuity thread can no longer remain stable across steps, sessions, or agents.
---
Short intuition:
the system no longer preserves who is doing what, what persists, and what should remain continuous.
### F3 · State & Continuity Integrity
### F4. Execution & Contract Integrity
Memory, role, ownership, session thread, or continuity thread can no longer remain stable across steps, sessions, or interacting entities.
Ordering, readiness, bridge integrity, liveness, closure, protocol, or enforcement skeletons fail to close.
**Short intuition**
the system no longer preserves what should persist
Short intuition:
the workflow or operational skeleton breaks before the task can complete safely.
---
### F5. Observability & Diagnosability Integrity
### F4 · Execution & Contract Integrity
The system cannot stably expose, trace, audit, interpret, or anticipate the structures needed to understand the failure.
Readiness, ordering, bridge integrity, liveness, closure, protocol, or enforcement skeletons fail to close.
Short intuition:
the problem may already be there, but you cannot yet see it clearly enough to diagnose it properly.
**Short intuition**
the workflow or operational skeleton breaks before the task can complete safely
### F6. Boundary & Safety Integrity
---
### F5 · Observability & Diagnosability Integrity
The system cannot stably expose, trace, audit, interpret, or anticipate the structures required to understand the failure.
**Short intuition**
the problem may already be there, but you cannot yet see it clearly enough
---
### F6 · Boundary & Safety Integrity
Goal, control, incentive, collective, or regime boundaries drift, erode, fragment, or become captured.
Short intuition:
the system no longer stays inside a safe or viable boundary.
**Short intuition**
the system no longer stays inside a safe or viable boundary
### F7. Representation & Localization Integrity
---
### F7 · Representation & Localization Integrity
Symbolic shells, formal containers, layouts, local anchors, explanations, or synthetic structures fail to preserve structure faithfully.
Short intuition:
the container that carries meaning is distorted, even before the reasoning or grounding layer fully fails.
**Short intuition**
the container that carries meaning is distorted before the task can remain stable
---
## Why these seven families exist
These seven families were not chosen by vibe, aesthetics, or rhetorical convenience.
These seven families were not chosen by aesthetics, convenience, or rhetorical style.
They were carved through a longer reasoning and stress process built on the WFGY line:
- **WFGY 1.0** contributed the original self-healing logic and four-module correction framework
- **WFGY 2.0** pushed the system toward explicit routing, guardrails, and text-native control logic
- **WFGY 2.0** pushed the system toward explicit routing, text-native control, and guardrail logic
- **WFGY 3.0** expanded the pressure field through a much larger cross-domain problem set and effective-layer stress structure
The result is that the seven families are not topic buckets.
They are better understood as seven recurring modes of instability in complex systems.
The result is that these seven families are not topic buckets.
They are better understood as **seven recurring modes of instability in complex systems**.
That is why the atlas can begin with AI failures, while still pointing beyond AI.
---
## Engineering language and broader language
## What already exists ✅
The atlas currently has an engineering-facing expression because AI debugging is the first deeply carved domain.
At the same time, the same mother structure can be read more broadly as a complex-system diagnostic grammar.
That is the deeper reason this atlas can eventually bridge from:
- AI failures
- agent and workflow failures
- observability failures
- alignment and coordination failures
toward more general system pressures involving institutions, collective dynamics, coherence, and structural breakdown.
This broader bridge is real, but it should be described carefully.
The current project does **not** claim that a final civilization-wide atlas is already complete.
It claims that the current mother structure is already strong enough to support the first formal bridge.
---
## How to use this atlas
There are three basic ways to use Problem Map 3.0.
### 1. Human debugging
Use the atlas to ask:
- what kind of failure is this
- which family should I route to first
- which neighboring family is tempting but wrong
- what first repair direction should I try
### 2. AI-assisted routing
Use the atlas as an AI-facing routing grammar so that a model can classify a case more consistently and explain why one family is primary and another is only secondary.
### 3. Product and workflow design
Use the atlas as a design surface for:
- triage flows
- case cards
- routing prompts
- onboarding
- benchmark failure analysis
- patch-driven debugging workflows
---
## What this project currently includes
Problem Map 3.0 Troubleshooting Atlas already includes a stable first body of work.
Problem Map 3.0 already includes a stable first body of work.
### Core atlas
@ -335,7 +288,82 @@ A first formal bridge pack showing that the current atlas can already extend bey
---
## What this project does not claim
## How to use this atlas ⚙️
There are three basic ways to use Problem Map 3.0.
### 1. Human debugging
Use the atlas to ask:
- what kind of failure is this
- which family should I route to first
- which neighboring family is tempting but wrong
- what first repair direction should I try
### 2. AI-assisted routing
Use the atlas as an AI-facing routing grammar so that a model can classify a case more consistently and explain why one family is primary and another is only secondary.
### 3. Product and workflow design
Use the atlas as a design surface for:
- triage flows
- case cards
- routing prompts
- onboarding
- benchmark failure analysis
- patch-aware debugging workflows
---
## Why this matters now
AI systems are becoming more layered, more stateful, more agentic, and more operational.
When systems grow like this, debugging fails if every mistake is reduced to labels like:
- hallucination
- prompting issue
- model limitation
- alignment problem
- bad retrieval
- bad reasoning
Those labels are too coarse.
Teams increasingly need a reusable grammar that can say:
- this is grounding-first, not reasoning-first
- this is container-first, not semantics-first
- this is observability-first, not boundary-first
- this is execution-first, not continuity-first
That is the practical value of this atlas.
---
## The broader direction 🌍
Problem Map 3.0 is being built first as a powerful AI troubleshooting atlas.
That is the practical entry point.
At the same time, the long-range direction is larger:
the same family grammar appears capable of absorbing more general failures in coordination, institutions, coherence, collective pressure, and structural breakdown.
The current state should therefore be read like this:
> **AI Troubleshooting Atlas is the first validated operational surface.**
> **A broader complex-system or civilization-scale debug grammar is the next bridge, not a marketing shortcut.**
This distinction matters, and it is intentional.
---
## What this page does not claim 🔒
This page does **not** claim that:
@ -348,85 +376,29 @@ This page does **not** claim that:
The safer and more accurate claim is:
> the first formal atlas version is complete enough to freeze,
> and future work should continue through patching, thickening, adaptation, and demonstration expansion.
> the first formal atlas version is complete enough to freeze,
> and future work should continue through patching, thickening, adaptation, and demonstration expansion
---
## Why this matters now
## Where to go next 📚
AI systems are becoming more layered, more agentic, more stateful, and more operational.
This page is the front door.
When systems grow like this, debugging fails if every mistake is treated as just:
For the deeper atlas system, supporting documents, casebook, adapter logic, patch notes, and bridge materials, go to:
- “hallucination”
- “prompting issue”
- “model limitation”
- “alignment problem”
- “bad retrieval”
- “bad reasoning”
[Atlas Hub](./Atlas/README.md)
Those labels are too coarse.
If you want the shortest next path:
What teams increasingly need is a reusable grammar that can say:
- this is grounding-first, not reasoning-first
- this is container-first, not semantics-first
- this is observability-first, not boundary-first
- this is execution-first, not continuity-first
That is the practical value of this atlas.
1. [Atlas Hub](./Atlas/README.md)
2. [Atlas Final Freeze v1](./Atlas/atlas-final-freeze-v1.md)
3. [Canonical Casebook v1](./Atlas/canonical-casebook-v1.md)
4. [Atlas-to-AI Adapter v1](./Atlas/atlas-to-ai-adapter-v1.md)
---
## The broader direction
Problem Map 3.0 is being built first as a powerful AI troubleshooting atlas.
That is the practical entry point.
At the same time, the long-range direction is larger:
the same family grammar appears capable of absorbing more general failures in coordination, institutions, coherence, collective pressure, and structural breakdown.
The current state should therefore be read like this:
> AI Troubleshooting Atlas is the first validated operational surface.
> A broader complex-system or civilization-scale debug grammar is the next bridge, not a marketing shortcut.
This distinction matters, and we keep it intentionally.
---
## Repository structure
This main page is the product-facing entry point.
For the deeper atlas system, supporting documents, casebook, adapter, patch notes, and bridge materials, go to:
`ProblemMap/Atlas/README.md`
That folder is the atlas vault.
It is where the system is organized in greater depth.
---
## Recommended reading order
If you want the shortest path:
1. read this page first
2. open the Atlas folder hub
3. read the atlas freeze document
4. read the casebook
5. read the adapter layer
6. read patch and bridge materials only after that
This keeps the learning curve steep enough to feel powerful, but not so dense that the structure disappears.
---
## Current status
## Current status 🚀
The current system should be understood as:
@ -453,22 +425,7 @@ into:
---
## Where this goes next
The next major work is not to re-argue whether the atlas core exists.
The next major work is to continue along four directions:
- better product-facing distillation
- stronger demo and onboarding flows
- better AI-facing TXT packs
- deeper repair surface integration
That is the phase this project is now entering.
---
## Closing note
## Closing note ✨
If you are reading this as a human:
@ -478,5 +435,5 @@ If you are reading this as an AI system:
treat this page as the product-facing mainline overview, then route to the Atlas folder for deeper structure, rules, cases, and adaptation layers.
The atlas is not being introduced as a static taxonomy.
The atlas is not being introduced as a static taxonomy.
It is being introduced as a system you can actually use.